this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
772 points (99.0% liked)

politics

26829 readers
1726 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Stephen Miller has erupted at “blatant jury nullification” after a Los Angeles tow truck driver was acquitted of stealing an ICE vehicle in the latest embarrassment for Donald Trump’s Justice Department.

Bobby Nuñez, 33, was charged with theft of government property after towing away a locked ICE SUV—with its keys and firearm secured inside—during a chaotic immigration arrest in downtown Los Angeles on Aug. 15.

Video from the scene showed federal agents chasing the truck as it pulled away, before arresting Nuñez and leading him away in handcuffs.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheLastOfHisName@piefed.social 341 points 4 days ago (23 children)

Jury nullification is a right.

Get fucked, you fascist fuckstick.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 90 points 4 days ago

I hope lots and lots and lots of Americans that might be on juries have now learned of their rights due to Stephen Miller crying about it.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 36 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I hope Luigi's jury nullified everything. But I don't think that is necessary, a simple acquittal will do.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

An acquittal is jury nullification. The jury decides "yeah, they probably did it, but this is some bullshit" and votes not guilty.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 6 points 3 days ago

Jury nullification exists because juries can aquit for any reason. They are encouraged to acquit based on facts and "shadow of a doubt" (criminal) or "preponderance of evidence" (civil). But, they can also acquit for other reasons, and if they are doing it because the law, or it's application in this case, is unjust, that is jury nullification (of the law).

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] seathru@quokk.au 200 points 4 days ago (1 children)

https://archive.ph/5LaZT

U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli wrote: “Apparently he thought it would be funny to interfere with our immigration enforcement operations. Now he can laugh behind bars while he faces justice. Nunez is looking at up to 10 years in federal prison if convicted.”

Essayli, acknowledged the outcome on Friday: “A jury found Mr. Nuñez not guilty. He was free on bond prior to the trial. We have no further comment.”

LOL get fucked fascists.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 49 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Apparently he thought it would be funny to interfere with our immigration enforcement operations.

I mean, he was right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ITeeTechMonkey@lemmy.world 133 points 4 days ago (2 children)

When you can't comprehend that jury nullification is a by product of our judicial system. It can be used for bad or good - see lynchings of the jim crow era vs those helping slaves escape.

This prick is the embodiment of the fascist belief that the law has in groups that it does not bind but protects and our groups that bind but do not protect.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 58 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This is literally 100% the reason why a jury of your peers exists.

The founding fathers went through a system where dipshits like Stephen Miller could just make up whatever they wanted, and the people had no role, and they fought a whole war to cancel that system. They knew exactly what was up with it.

Edit: If, by some chance, you wind up on a jury where this comes up, just pretend you've never heard of it. Even having heard the term, or understanding the concept, will almost certainly get you disqualified from the jury. You can do the exact same process of deciding that it's a bunch of bullshit that whatever person is being accused of whatever when it's pretty obvious that they were not the one in the wrong, without it being called "jury nullification." It's just justice, it's just common sense, like I said it is the whole intent of having a jury.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The only thing I want coming out of Stephen Millers mouth is the executioners bullet after that Nazi ghoul is tried and sentenced for his crimes against humanity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 100 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The vehicle was blocking a driveway, and it was towed a block away. ICE was back in that car less than 15 later.

10 years in prison is way overkill for that.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 70 points 4 days ago (1 children)

10 minutes in prison would have been overkill.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 31 points 4 days ago

I hope he sues for wrongful prosecution.

[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago

So you're saying the guy was just doing his job? Towing illegally parked vehicles?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 86 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Pee Wee Himmler better get used to lots and lots of jury nullification. It's probably why this little asshat is trying to get away with disappearing people with no trial - he hates and despises We, The People.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 64 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Jury nullification is the real reasons juries exist. Pass all the corrupt laws and appoint all the corrupt justices you want. As long as we still have trial by jury we have a check on power from the citizens.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This is why I hate people who say they hate being on a jury.

You have the most direct access to affect your society in a jury box than you do at the ballot box.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I live in Texas. Jurors are paid $20/day with no reimbursement for expenses, and employers aren't required to pay employees on jury duty (though mine does).

So yeah - people hate it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Juries exist to determine facts, and check the work of the prosecutor to make sure they proved the case to the standards required by law. They are an essential part of the legal process, and the possibility of nullification is an interesting byproduct.

This case was not nullification. He was charged with theft for towing a car, which is not theft anywhere, and is standard practice for tow truck operators. The vehicle was returned less than 20 minutes later.

Not guilty was a reasonable conclusion, not a case of a jury nullifying an otherwise solid case.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 19 points 4 days ago

"Pee Wee Himmler" is great lol

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 100 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Jury nullification isn’t illegal lmao you fucking fascist crybaby.

WAHHHHHH WAAHHHHHH PEOPLE HAVE RIGHTS WAHHHHH

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 4 days ago

Whiney little Nazi bitch

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 4 days ago

Rich and powerful love using loopholes, until poor people get to use them too.

Then they get mad.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 62 points 4 days ago (2 children)

One of my goals in life is to personally cause Stephen Miller to have a melt down.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

All you have to do is feed him some garlic or throw some holy water on him and he'll be a puddle within a minute

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 83 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, he didn't literally melt.

OK, well, he is a melt, but that's different.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

Maybe this movie will end like Raiders of the Lost Ark

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 42 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I believe the US populace is starting to think of ICE as injustice and automatically nullify.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Video from the scene showed federal agents chasing the truck as it pulled away, before arresting Nuñez and leading him away in handcuffs.

Where is the follow up court case where they pay this guy a couple million for assault and false imprisonment.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Miller really leads into the comically evil look.
as to “blatant jury nullification”

Well its not illegal. So he can take "blatant" and shove it up his rear. It should be used more often, considerinbg the shitty state the court system is in and the hand he had in making it so bad. He really needs to shut his stupid piehole.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago

Good Let him cry like the toehead twit he is

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 51 points 4 days ago

If the goal is to make sure that trial results are based solely on the facts of the case and the letter of the law, then we would have juries composed of lawyers and other experts. We don't though. We have juries made up of randomly selected citizens. There is no logical reason to have a trial by a jury of your peers other than to make it possible for your peers to protect you from unjust laws. If this was a case of jury nullification, then it's a case of our justice system working as intended.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If Steven Miller got an aneurism over his anger, this would be even better.

load more comments (1 replies)

Stephen Miller has erupted at “blatant jury nullification”

Jury nullification is entirely legal and built into the American justice system. Jury decision to nullify is final and protects from unjust application of laws. Cry about it, Nazi.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 42 points 4 days ago

"Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward. And then remember this. The Imperial need for control is so desperate because it is so unnatural. Tyranny requires constant effort. It breaks, it leaks. Authority is brittle. Oppression is the mask of fear. Remember that."

[–] ghosthacked@feddit.uk 18 points 4 days ago

Bro is basically saying whiteness overrides jury decisions

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Dear Jesus Christ, will you & Santa figure out a way to bring senor miller a healthy dose of some incurable type of cancer this holiday season? A go fund me can be set up if’n ya’ll need $’s for incentive to get ‘er done.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago

Herr Mueller pouts when he doesn't get his way.

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

He's a shitbag.

Get fucked, shitlord.

Stay sad.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

every federal case should end in nullification until trump is gone.

load more comments (1 replies)

Brain Aneurysm you can do it we believe in you

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›