260
Deputy AG: Bondi to hold back 'several hundred thousand' Epstein docs in Friday dump
(www.rawstory.com)
There it is
We need to fucking riot
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
260 points (100.0% liked)
politics
26829 readers
1726 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
best we can do is No Kings 3: We Totally Mean It This Time For Real. get your poster board ready
You needed to fucking riot eons ago
You needed to fucking riot eons ago
Who's "we"?
The time for accountability was November 2024. Most of America said they either like this, or were fine with it.
Why would they suddenly start rioting?
Is that not breaking the law?
A law without a mechanism of enforcement is just a suggestion.
It's cool. It'll only take Americans 5-10 years to realize they've been in a corporate oligarch dictatorship this entire time.
I hear states are preparing a lawsuit demanding a “pretty please” be added no later than 2028.
At least one Democrat will performatively blast them.
We're past blasting, so 2018. Now we're on flaying.
Someone needs to tell the justice department that the justice department is in violation of the law and should dispense justice.
laws don't matter anymore, remember?
They matter against us but not them.
Who will charge them? Bondi?
Laws are irrelevant if nobody is enforcing them
Confirmed Trump is in several hundred thousand Epstein docs?
They're not the Epstein files. They're the Trump pedo-files.
Everyone knows what Trump is. This cover up is for his owners.
Predictable, honestly.
I've discussed this with a few people in the last week. What's going to happen with the release on Friday. The only sensible answer is, all the things we've seen from the Trump admin on everything:
- re-interpret court orders
- play for time
- blame others
- deny wrong doing
- distraction
This release was always going to be unsatisfying. They'll never release something that incriminates Trump.
But by all means, please, let’s keep forcing their hand on this issue. This one issue works… the longer they hold out, the longer we can continue to occupy their prefrontal cortex, the less bandwidth they have for other heinous shit.
I disagree. They've done loads of heinous shit while everyone is focused on the files.
As is the goal for flooding the zone. Don’t let them convince you that your efforts have no impact.
Seriously?
The goal of flooding the zone is to do heinous shit while you're distracted.
In this case, distracted by something which is ultimately not actionable.
You've been carrying on about this for the last 6 months and have forced them to release a photo of Clinton in the hot tub. Well done. Really holding their feet to the fire here.
I think this still fails to see the bigger picture. They released something they hadn’t before, which shows that progress was made. Had Trump held all the power, that wouldn’t have happened. Now, what are your ideas and how much progress have they made so far?
That's my point though, what has this recent release achieved? You can't claim its progress if no progress has been made. If anything its counter productive because predictably, the released files and photos have exposed key figures from the left.
My idea is to not be as stupid as Americans seem to be. Working out pretty well so far.
Like I said, we now have more than we did before. You can look at that from multiple angles: (1) we have more recency to his most heinous activities. This stuff gets to some of his supporters. (2) we have more legal leverage over him now, for what it’s worth now and in the coming years. (3) we have more documents from the Epstein case now. (4) we have ever so slightly forced his hand and thus demonstrated it is possible to do so, even if it wasn’t exactly the outcome we immediately demanded.
Your argument to me feels like it tries to invalidate the only demonstrable progress that has actually occurred, for its size alone. It’s to say no progress is better than little progress, which I whole heartedly disagree with. This is slight positional progress, and I’d ask again: how much progress have your ideas made in resolving the kind of situation America faces? Because “to not be as stupid as Americans seem to be” isn’t actually doing anything except admitting you don’t face the problem yourself and likely have no solutions to offer.
String that cunt up with the pedos she's covering for, then
Never forget she was Florida AG from 2011 to 2019, with the power to take action against Epstein herself. She never did, though she held the proof. NY had to do it instead.
Time for the Dems to pull something out of the secret stash of creepy estate photos.
I was promised all the documents. I was promised they couldn't hold any back just to avoid embarrassing someone
Lol
It's really kind of them to protect all the democrats they say are the only ones implicated in those files. They've gone to so much effort to protect people that no one wants them to protect. Other democrats don't want them protected, and republicans don't generally want anyone protected other than themselves, like each individual republican. So it's quite the uncommon situation to have so many republicans choose to protect people that are not only meaningless to them, but people you would think they would see as their enemies as well as criminals.
So yeah, anyway.... it can be pretty tough to keep 100 lies straight, unless the person you are lying to is also invested in those lies being the truth.
Who’s got the dirt on Bondi?
Epstein clearly.
Being a high level person in the administration probably means you're in the files.
Well, we know the next move. The goal now is to slowly disperse heat from Trump. They’re going to release the names of political enemies first—which will tire some folk. If backlash ensues, maybe they’ll release the names of some low ranking followers or foreign leaders. The very last thing they’ll release, if so, will be anything implicating Trump. If that happens, the goal will be to have diluted any possible impact by then. To tire the rioters, to normalize the prior crimes, to get the news cycles following other events (like a potential war with Venezuela). They’re trying to ice us, like in sport.
Ok, americans, when the fat orange cunt dies will you go after her, and people like her, for what she's done to protect him, and other paedos?
Or will you let these people get away with it also?