this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
453 points (98.1% liked)

196

5045 readers
2345 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
453
Rule (piefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com)
 

The study later got retracted due to backlash but the fact that it happened at all if fucking baffling.

Don't forget this study that instead of studying the causes or cures for endo studied the mental effects of the men in a relationship with someone who has endo.

(page 2) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Conclusions of the study:

“Women with rectovaginal endometriosis were judged to be more attractive than those in the two control groups. Moreover, they had a leaner silhouette, larger breasts, and an earlier coitarche.”.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Coitarche was a new word for me.

[–] xkbx@startrek.website 14 points 1 day ago

It leaves room for terms like coitarche nemesis

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 35 points 1 day ago

“I applied for this grant as a joke, but they actually accepted it. Now I have to work with these creeps. How the fuck do I scientifically evaluate ‘attractiveness’?”

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Genuinely don't see the issue with either.

Attractiveness of people suffering from illnesses is not a rare study really.

Quick Google Scholar search revealed for example these three:

Physical attractiveness and mental illness

Physical Attractiveness and Maladjustment Among Psychiatric Inpatients

Body image of children and adolescents with chronic illness: A meta-analytic comparison with healthy peers

I don't see any sociologists ever working on finding a cure or a cause of illnesses.

Similarly, the mental health effects of illnesses on their partner is also not a rare study:

Quality of Life: Impact of Chronic Illness on the Partner

The Impact of Partner Alcohol Problems on Women's Physical and Mental Health

My Illness or Our Illness? Attending to the Relationship When One Partner Is Ill.

I have not read any of these studies btw because neither sociology or medicine is a field I'm studying.

Still, I don't see the issue with funding such studies. It doesn't take away any resources whatsoever from researchers attempting to find cures/causes. (Partially because academia is so underfunded, you'd be hard pressed trying to find something to even take away)

[–] verdi@feddit.org 2 points 23 hours ago

Yes, but, clout and engagement >>>> rational thought.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] sunflower@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

While infuriating, I love Lemmy and actually posting sources.

On topic, I don't know how to feel because I value academic freedom but at the same time I just ask Why? Didn't anyone think about it beforehand? Reading their apology was joyful. Can't imagine how they felt.

And why would they retract it too? Isn't only an apology correct for their purpose? Sigh.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Lmao the Italians definitely not beating the allegations with this study

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 17 points 1 day ago

Facts that make you want to slap fifty people at random

[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›