this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
196 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26716 readers
2154 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said there will not be an amendment vote on extending expiring ObamaCare enhanced subsidies as part of a House Republican health care bill this week, in a move that is infuriating moderate Republicans who had been pushing to go on the record about the subsidies.

Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), one of the members who had been pushing for a vote to extend the subsidies that expire Dec. 31, fumed at the decision as he emerged from a House Republican Conference meeting Tuesday morning.

“I think it’s idiotic not to have an up-or-down vote on this issue,” Lawler said, adding: “It is political malpractice.”

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 31 minutes ago

Initiate plan B

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 5 points 38 minutes ago

What!?!?! Did the Republicans make a deal to get their tax break passed and then lie about their part of the bargain? Really, no one saw this coming .... except everyone.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 29 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So glad that the Democrats went ahead and passed the CR without any concessions on this. It worked out so great here!

Idiots.

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

I really hope every cunt capitulating to the Nazis gets primaried and removed from office

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago (2 children)
[–] billbasher@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago
[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 1 points 50 minutes ago

To the volcano with you

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 72 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Well, good thing Dems threw away their leverage for a vote that never happened. See, folks...this is what "winning" looks like.

[–] abrake@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago

FYI the vote did happen a few days ago. It just had the entirely predictable result of failing, since there was no longer any leverage for Republicans to vote for it

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 38 points 10 hours ago

Democrats sold out for the promise of maybe a deal.

Complicit.

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 123 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

so blinking on the shutdown confirmed useless. super.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 65 points 11 hours ago

who could have predicted this?!?

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 18 points 10 hours ago

Less than useless. Actually harmful. The shutdown itself hurt working families and they caved because they knew people would suffer next year with no subsidies. If they were gonna cave anyway they should never have started the shutdown. It was just for press so they can tie themselves to the idea of lower healthcare. In lieu of helping people now they are letting them suffer on the hope that if they suffer enough they'll vote blue. It's disgusting and transparent.

[–] immutable@lemmy.zip 33 points 11 hours ago

Not completely useless it allowed the republicans to have a talking point that the democrats were obstructing for no reason.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 hours ago

As was foretold by the deep magic.

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

What worries me most is their acting like they don’t worry about the midterms … how?!

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 11 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

People are deeply stupid.

The Left will inevitably start getting pissy that their candidates didn't win primaries and sit out the generals. And the conservatives will get brainwashed into thinking all the problems were a time bomb left by Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

And... it is increasingly looking like there might be good odds that trump is dead by then and president vance (and now I threw up in my mouth a bit) is sacrificed as "undoing all the good trump did and why you need to vote for hegseth in 2028"

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Also at this stage they know they will just fix the vote if things aren't swinging their way. They don't give a rats ass about the law anymore.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

Vote fixing is not that easy.

Massive landslide victories will be far too obvious. I am not sure if there is a "Your honor, this is clearly bullshit" clause for recounts but it will trigger them.

As for the closer stuff? Yes, electronic voting is deeply stupid and dangerous. But it is also worth understanding that many systems are still built around a paper ballot that you feed into it. And those will show massive discrepancies. ESPECIALLY in the "blue states" where these wins would most matter.

For a presidential election? I could see a world where very targeted election fraud could MAYBE be pulled off, but I stand by: can you imagine the chuds and musk NOT bragging about outright fraud?

But for midterms and anything down ballot? The places that matter most are the ones where republicans don't control the state government in its entirety. And when the recount is like 20% different than the reported vote?

Nah. Election fraud is the distraction. They'll just perform, ANOTHER, violent insurrection and take the government by force.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If you rig the elections enough you don't have to worry.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Or you just cancel them because something something "antifa".

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 6 points 11 hours ago

Rigged elections. Republican super donor company bought dominion voting machines. Just one example.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Obviously they have a plan for that

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You think there will be midterms.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 7 hours ago

There will absolutely be midterms, just like how Russia has elections. They go through the motions and report the results they want.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Listen, you got what you voted for. Maybe the next time you're forced to choose between pay your bloated premiums or your bloated deductibles and copays, you'll remember this moment and vote differently.

I'm just going to sit here, smugly, and enjoy my Italian citizenship and complementary public health care system.

[–] SantasMagicalComfort@piefed.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I hope the Italian healthcare system is doing better than it was in 2020.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You want us to check the COVID leaderboard?

If Italy was a US state it would be 21st best of the 51 right between Iowa and Illinois in deaths per million.

[–] WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

Ho trovato il repubblicano.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

If enough GOP Representatives are upset about it, they can either band with the Democrats to file a discharge petition to force a vote, the same way they did with the Epstein files. They could also move forward with a motion to unseat Speaker Johnson entirely. If they’re unwilling to do either then, quite frankly, I don’t want to hear about their crocodile tears.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Can anybody help me out with exactly what this means? I helped my son do his insurance last night and it's still showing a subsidy. Right now he has a $40 a month plan with a $400 subsidy. I know he'll probably owe a penalty on that when/ if he does his taxes. It's incredibly confusing!

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 31 points 11 hours ago

I'm tired, boss

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Obese Leopard eating the faces of the 8 Democrat sellouts.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 hours ago

I'm just going to sit here and enjoy the no deductible insurance provided to me by my blue state job, that costs me $10 a month after trading in vacation time to get a $110 discount each month. Mike Lawler voted against impeaching trump, again on 12/11/25. He voted yes to tabling impeachment in June of 2025 also. More performative bullshit from a rethuglican. Thoughts and prayers to the democrats in his district. Republicans in his district, along with him, can enjoy getting EXACTLY what they voted for. Lawler has that sweet sweet gubment insurance plan, so he'll be fine. I'll be waiting with the popcorn when his constituents turn on him.

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Truthfully, if the subsidies had been extended through 2026 to any degree, it would be a complete slap in the face to the responsible people who signed up by the deadline (Dec 15) to avoid a gap in coverage. Not that I wouldn't have been happy for those who fucked around and got rewarded for it, but I'd also have been pissed because I followed the rules and I'm locked into a suboptimal plan now because it's the best I could afford -- yet it's complete shit. Even a partial subsidy would likely have empowered me to be able to select something better. Not to mention, I've spent the past month trying to decide if I can even afford insurance at all. And also not to mention that the rules and policies should have been fully and completely finalized well ahead of the November start of open enrollment.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Everyone who wanted the government to still be shut down, air travel crippled, and families hungry, we’re so sorry.

We had no idea the republicans would fuck up so bad that even their brain-dead cult gets angry at them.