this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
494 points (92.9% liked)

Political Memes

9854 readers
2002 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Bold of you to assume Democrats don't know what they are doing.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Every election is the most important in your lifetime as long as fascists are on the ballot.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If your system has allowed itself to devolve into "vote for my slightly less oppressive status quo or else you get abject oppression" then you kinda have to begin admitting the entire system is folly and needs to be dismantled.

[–] Kimjongtooill@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Getting rid of Citizens United and implementing ranked choice voting will get rid of this. We have to continue voting for the most progressive candidates running in the primaries and still eating the shit sandwich when it's an establishment dem if we ever want to fix it.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're not wrong. Easier said than done, though. Looks like we'll be doing it the hard way, societal collapse.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good, this society deserves to collapse. It is fundamentally oppressive and exploitative.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Also don't disagree. It's just tragic how much suffering has to happen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] theolodis@feddit.org 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If it's that important maybe the democrats should start appealing their target group instead of trying to get Republicans to vote for them (which didn't really work anyways)

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's possible that there is a way to win them over, but it's not by getting up on stage with Liz Cheney. The idea of "the elites are working against us" does resonate with certain Republican voters, even if their anger is being misdirected in support of Donald Trump. It's not something the Hillary Clinton wing of the party could possibly harness. People like Bernie or AOC could, though.

Here's Bernie demonstrating it: https://youtu.be/RP8Oxe6OxJc

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've seen that video before. It's a good one that, to me from far away, shows how the more progressive side of the democratic party should very much resonate with poorer, currently republican voters if they just leaned into that messaging more.

The message at it's core is so simple: The country is rich, you're poor, fuck that shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Agreed. I vote for them out of practicality, not because I actually like them.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Remember when the Democrats propped up Trump thinking Clinton would curbstomp him because who the hell would vote for him? Good times. (Europe is doing the same, pushing the far right to pretend the vanilla right is the only viable opposition and actually pretty center, and then act surprised when everything implodes)

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I do! Real It Can't Happen Here moment. Kinda worse in Europe because It's Already Happened There.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It already happened there 90 years ago. AND they get to see our results within this decade. They think afd is different from Trump somehow? Not significantly.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It’s a trick to keep preserving an awful status quo in perpetuity for your whole life.

Surely the fascists will pack up and go home if the Democrats can just win this one time…

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair, everyone has to keep saying "This is the most important election of X" because everyone fucking has the attention spans and memories of earthworms or bivalves.

Half of Lemmy right here would tune and use any excuse to not be involved, and this is a politically active community, imagine what it's like out there for the vast majority of voters who work 6 days a week and get all their media and news from fucking facebook for two hours on a Sunday night while kids and dogs are fighting around them.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To be fair, the current election is always the most important one of the time. Does no good to ruminate about the past, and nobody knows what the future holds.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

These past few elections have been fucking important. As someone who lived through the whole "boring" era of Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama, these last 10 years have been aberrant in every way politically and it's dumb to pretend they haven't been.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I fully agree, it's too bad that the point was lost on so many people who just heard "YOU HAVE TO VOTE" and didn't make any effort to absorb reality and multiple angles of actual news stories and not just Facebook memes and shorts played on Twitter.

The last several elections have had the highest turnouts in US history, including the largest youth turnout, but on exit polling the people were completely tuned-out and said they didn't actually think there was meaningful differences between candidates and just based their decisions on prices of groceries and who was in charge when the prices got high... by their own reckoning. A lot of "Well maybe Trump will shake things up" and seemed to have ZERO memory of his first term or that he was even president before.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Bush II was not "boring". His neocon illiberal war on terror, torture, rendition, patriot act and illegal war started the descent into what we are experiencing now.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 31 points 1 day ago (30 children)

Being against the rabid Zionism of the Dem mainstream is based. The second point, not so much.

warn people that losing an election to fascists will lead to fascism

people ignore the warning

election is lost to fascists

fascist administration immediately starts doing fascist things

blame the LIBS for making a big deal out of it

???

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

my gripe with them about that, is that they refuse to do any systemic change to avoid fascism, because they have three same corporate donors that republicans have. their job isn't too protect the people, is to preserve the status quo that leads to erosion of rights.

They had plenty of time to codify abortion rights, instead they sat on it to use as a carrot for the next election.

that's why every election is the most important, because they refuse to fix the system

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

On one hand, I would point out that many 'easy' fixes are not actually that easy when you consider the fucked state of our government and that the Dems are inherently a 'big-tent' party.

On the other hand, you're completely correct that the Dem mainstream refuses (without being pressed) to consider anything that shakes the precious status quo because it would upset their donors, and they refuse to consider that the system might be broken and in need of fixing (though that latter point, admittedly, they share with our blinkered fucking electorate).

I would point out more broadly that though money is a MASSIVE influence in US politics, ultimately, votes are the motivator for most Dem politicians. Politicians are generally in the position because they like power, and they cling to power by re-election. If the narrative of the electorate changes, and voting patterns with it, especially primary voting patterns, Dem politicians will fall over themselves to change their stated positions. If by the next primary cycle, the Dem electorate had shifted to be a bunch of far-left radicals who demanded repeated-if-futile attempts to reform the system even with a minority in the legislature, and massacred incumbents accordingly, even ghouls like Pelosi would suddenly become champions of 'the people'.

The mistake many people on here make is thinking that politicians in a bourgeois democracy are loyal to capital in some nebulous way, and aiming for wealth. By and large, they are not (though there are certainly exceptions, both ideological and personal). By and large, they are loyal to themselves, and aiming for power. Capital and wealth are only means to that end. As long as the support of capital buys them votes, and wealth buys them influence, they will pursue both - when capital stops guaranteeing a re-election from an electorate with the approximate memory of goldfish, mainstream politicians will change their allegiances accordingly.

HOW the fuck we get there, I have no fucking clue. But it is good to remain clear-sighted on the nature of the enemy.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 30 points 1 day ago (14 children)

I think their point is that they pull the same tactic every year and it's clear it's shit

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›