this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
16 points (86.4% liked)

UK Politics

4390 readers
149 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://ibbit.at/post/112057

Keir Starmer took to Facebook to claim that he had a hard upbringing. And, the majority couldn’t help but laugh. The prime minister said:

Growing up, we didn’t have much. I remember our landline being cut off because we couldn’t pay the bill. I know what it’s like to sit around your kitchen table worrying about the cost of living. People want more money in their pocket to do the things that matter to them; give the kids a treat, go out for a meal, have a holiday. That’s why the upcoming Budget will be a Labour Budget, with Labour values running right through it; focused on protecting our public services and improving the cost of living. That’s what I’m focused on. That’s what this government is all about.

Starmer: not the best approach

Respondents quickly ratioed the post with 26,000 laugh emojis and 24,000 comments compared to 2,700 likes at the time of writing. And a number of users pointed out a flaw in his story of early woes:

You must have had a few quid to have a landline most of us used a phone box then.

In 1970, when Starmer was growing up, only 35% of households had a landline.

Another user commented:

Had your land line cut off ; your dad owned a factory !!

Whether Starmer’s dad owned a factory is unclear, but he did own Oxted Tool Company. Besides, the idea that a person’s background means they cannot join the elite through protecting them in parliament is questionable. Margaret Thatcher was born into a lower middle class family with a grocer for a father and she conducted far-reaching class war in favour of elites, privatising public assets, deregulating the financial sector, and crushing unions.

On the flipside, Friedrich Engels was born into an upper class German family and he went on to co-author the Communist Manifesto with Karl Marx. These examples show why Starmer’s ‘my childhood was tough’ mantra falls flat, on top of the fact he’s lying: he was clearly reasonably well-off.

Starmer publicly mentioned his father’s job as a ‘toolmaker’ at least 29 times from 2020-2024.

Starmer’s government

What’s more, it’s clear that this Labour government is not “protecting our public services” nor “improving the cost of living”. Since Starmer came to power, NHS privatisation has increased by up to 71% in some areas and at an average of 10% in just one year. This means private corporations leeching more money from public healthcare budgets.

And Labour is doing nothing to address the root causes of the manufactured cost of living crisis. In the past five years, UK food prices have gone up by 37% under the neoliberal system Starmer is protecting. Over the same period, Tesco’s operating profit has skyrocketed from £1.8bn in 2020/21 to £3.1bn in 2024/25, an increase of 72%.

And, as of 2023, the super rich extracted a whopping 45% of the UK’s entire national income in profiteering rent, meaning everyone could almost be twice as well off. On the flipside, only 55% of national income went to working people.

While there’s a role for the free market with small and medium size enterprises (SMEs), it’s clear that capitalist extraction shouldn’t serve as a blueprint of the whole of society. Nonetheless, Starmer ditched his pledges to bring key utilities back into public ownership, which would reduce costs for every household and business.

No one’s bothered about Starmer 50 years ago – what’s important is what he’s doing now. As he descends further in the polls, it’s time for him to pack it in.

Featured image via the Canary

By James Wright


From Canary via this RSS feed

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Disclaimer: none of what I am about to say about the Canary's false reporting is a defence of Starmer.

The comments quoted above in reply to Starmer's post are just false and the fact that the Canary can't say so shows exactly why it's not a reliable news source. Right from the headline, this story is filled with plain lies.

First, the headline says that Starmer claimed to be working class. But, as the quotation shows, he didn't. Next:

Whether Starmer’s dad owned a factory is unclear

No, it isn't. He didn't own a factory. It's not unclear at all.

In 1970, when Starmer was growing up, only 35% of households had a landline.

That's one year. He 'was growing up' in more than one year. Why use these weasel words if they have a real point to make? In any case, that is just the point Starmer is making: he was, on and off, the kind of person who could afford a landline and the kind who had it cut off for not paying the bills, which I'm sure was worrying. That's the entirety of the point he was making.

Not mentioned here is that Starmer's mum had a long term illness and his brother had severe learning difficulties. There's very little doubt that things were often tough for his family. This doesn't at all absolve him from any kind of accurate criticism, but this 'story' as told by the Canary is nonsense. You don't beat the capitalist-owned press by just repeating their dishonest tactics.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

He literally by definition is though?

Class is something you're born and brought up in.

Starmer had a dad who worked in a factory, his mother was a nurse until she became too sick to work (at which point Starmer took over a lot of her care), and his brother is heavily disabled.

People say his school was private, but that's a bit of a lie, it only became private after he went there.

If you look at his childhood house, it isn't a good one. At one point they had to live for a while with one of their windows broken and boarded up.

I have criticisms of Starmer, but he does come from the working class in a way that other PMs haven't.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 5 points 22 hours ago

I think Frankie Boyle said it best that the guy looks like a Thunderbird puppet whose strings are pulled too tight

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Utterly ratiod? What does that mean? Slammed? Haha

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Zoomer talk for when a reply gets more likes than the original post. It happens all the time with politicians on social media. I'd be shocked if there were many posts from PMs that don't get "utterly ratio'd".

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Blasted, but Gen Z.

[–] MonsterTrick@piefed.world 2 points 19 hours ago

It means someone replies or quote post has more likes than OP's post.

[–] meejle@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think it refers to the ratio of "likes" to "dislikes". Like, when YouTube still showed a dislike count, it meant a video had significantly more dislikes than likes.

In this case I guess it got more "😄" and "😡" reacts than "👍" and "❤️"?

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 2 points 19 hours ago

So technically it could go either way. I’m so happy I never used twitter or YouTube (comment section)