this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
250 points (98.8% liked)

News

33196 readers
2492 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Officials admit ‘inadvertent removal’ after court ruled Britania Uriostegui Rios should not be sent to Mexico

The Trump administration is working to return another individual to the United States who was wrongfully deported to their home country in violation of a court order.

Officials acknowledged in a court filing last week that Britania Uriostegui Rios, a transgender woman, was "inadvertently" deported to Mexico in violation of a March court order which ruled that she was likely to face torture if she returned there.

The administration is working to bring Uriostegui Rios back to the US from Tijuana while it looks for an alternative country to deport her to. Uriostegui Rios is also suing to force the administration to release her from custody when she returns to the US.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 20 hours ago
[–] hayvan@feddit.nl 9 points 20 hours ago

So there is no rule of law. Good to know.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I want to see potential 2028 Democratic candidates NOW announce what they will do to right the wrongs of the current administration. For example, if I were running, I would publicly state:

"To all those illegally removed while going through the lawful immigration or asylum process, I tell you, you will receive justice. I promise to use executive authority to create a fast track to immigration and citizenship for anyone unjustly removed from the country by Trump. Any immigrant denied their due process by the Trump administration will receive full US citizenship by the end of my first term. Let President Trump know that denying asylum seekers their day in court will do him no good in the end. Asylum claimants normally have a low chance of success. But for those whose rights were violated? I will guarantee them success. I will guarantee not only asylum status, but full citizenship, to any asylum seeker that Trump has violated in our names!"

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I just don't think that's a good angle. It would be a good thing to do, but most people only started to realize that ICE doesn't go after criminals in the last month. They are insanely uninformed

We live in a fucked up society. You have to promise the voters something - Trump promised the deportations were magic that would fix all of your problems. That doesn't work in the other direction

The people of our country just lack compassion

[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 2 points 19 hours ago

The people of our country just lack compassion

..., critical thinking skills, empathy, understanding of the world outside their county, ability to reason for themselves...

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sounds like a way to lose an election.

You can promise due process without promising citizenship.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 20 hours ago

You could follow through on obvious cases of abuse, such as military recruiters lying, and guaranteeing that those who serve on the military will automatically get citizenship, or preferential treatment. No military veteran should be getting deported.

And anyone who has been in America for five years, does not have an AMERICAN criminal record, is employed, and is paying taxes, should have a fast track to citizenship.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's the only way to promise justice that cannot later be revoked by a second Trump. This is restitution. And it needs to be delivered in a durable form.

[–] Syun@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, a guarantee of citizenship without actually going through the process of vetting people? Just "we casually tossed you, not having done our job, so this time we'll not do our job a second time" is a pretty terrible policy, not to mention horribly unjust to everyone waiting in line. I worked with a guy who'd spent 17 years on the process to get his sister over to the US. Hearing about all the troubles he had, even as a citizen, trying to sponsor her and do things the right way and his frustration at the politicians wanting to just let people in ahead of her gave me a little more perspective on the whole process and what's just.

Besides, if they go through the process and become citizens, there's no revoking it anyway.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

not to mention horribly unjust to everyone waiting in line

Bullshit, the fact that a line exists because our systems move so slowly is what's unjust to those people

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago

"Oopsie-doodles!" --ICE

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

When does the court start issuing contempt sanctions?

Never because the capitalists don't have to play by their own rules

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The pilots need to be put in jail over this. If you can't cut the head off the snake take it's fangs.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

i believe the us govt uses a specific airline/carrier service soley for deportations. commercial wouldnt risk doing this.

Accidentally forgot to distract enough people who would notice.