this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
135 points (89.5% liked)

Technology

76945 readers
3213 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bvoigtlaender@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I guess they will eventually get there. It is interesting to point out though that the first robot is only shown from the torso down. Guess it has some support?

[–] jimerson@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Am I missing something, or did they just dress up a woman with a prosthetic leg to resemble an android, and remove the dressing around the prosthetic to "prove" she isn't human?

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

What a weird fucking tagline on an article that insinuates a robotic dystopian future.

Although there are some weird horny undertones, so I guess it checks out. Still, weird article all around

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 12 hours ago

They know what grabs people's attention.

[–] toffi@piefed.social 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

"We've now constructed the doomsday machine from the popular novel 'Don't build the doomsday machine'"

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I like the original “torment nexus” phrasing better.

[–] toffi@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago

Ah I was quoting from memory. You're right the torment nexus line is better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In a follow-up event to prove it was a robot, He Xiaopeng had its leg skin cut open in front of a live audience. The robot then walked off the stage.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

that one was AI video i believe.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 27 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What clickbait. Apparently any vaguely capable humanoid robot is a "straight-up Terminator"?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That's the most "Terminator" looking robot I've ever seen.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

If you can't handle me at my Roy Baty you don't deserve me at my Pris Stratton

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They meant that in terms of infiltration they're becoming more humanoid at an exponential level

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Press X to doubt

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago

Gen 1 Synth lookin' motherfucker.

[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The result is nice and cool. It is the level of modern journalism that is disturbing.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I worry about it. Every year I see more articles with sloppy mistakes that could be caught by any half-drunk editor phoning his job in. Sites springing up publishing 90% slop clearly so someone can keep writing. Not to mention the risks to journalism in a country where the president threatens any group whose speech he doesn't like.

As (i think) Parenti said, now is the time of monsters. Cool robot though. That, genuinely, is crazy impressive.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Why does it have boobs though? Is that like extra space For batteries? Why not a bellybutton if we are Going for realism?

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Because humans will put tits on anything. I watched a movie about sentient cockroaches, and the girl cockroaches all had tits.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

to be fair to the addition of bazongas, those characters are more 'humans in cockroach costumes' than 'sentient cockroaches.'

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

We all love some badongadongs tho

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's their target market, sex dolls.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Because when humans see a robot with boobs, the comments turn into "hey this robot has tits", and when they don't, the comments turn into "humanity is going to be euthanised by the machines".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

What?

It was a Reddit comment in response to this video (Catbox alt).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

That's a low bar

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure this grifter had a high bar when he said that.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I’m not saying this because she’s a billionaire, and this is really nothing against her, her looks, or her music, but I never found Taylor Swift to be, like, sexy. She’s quite beautiful and very talented but she’s just not who comes to mind when I think of slinky sexiness.

[–] pyria@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 day ago

She's too doll-like.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago

She's a bit stiff IMHO.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago

That looks more like a Terminatrix

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So they skipped the Dalek phase, huh?

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn’t Daleks have little squishy aliens inside them?

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

Yes, Daleks are not robots, they're squishy tentacle space nazis inside mobile battle casing pepperpots that they call War Machines. The Terminator T1 however looks vaguely like such a pepperpot if you squint and are Doctor Who brained.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago

Wheeled robots have been the norm for decades, we didn't skip that.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

What is the endgame here? People are supposed to buy these? To do what?

The took the fabric off a mechanical device to reveal it was a mechanical device. Disturbing?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'd buy one if it would help fight off ice agents.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Pretty sure ICE can afford to but thousands/millions of these cyborgs while normal people might have Alexa speakers.

[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

I read ice giants and thought I’d missed a headline today

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

To do what?

Chores and other stuff we don't want to/can't do. This has been the dream for decades now, so many old encyclopedias with "future tech" chapters show robots caring for people, sometimes as caregivers (for old people, or blind etc), sometimes as entertainers.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Except regular people will struggle to afford food out whilst these will be cleaning rich people's yachts.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›