this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
126 points (88.9% liked)

Technology

76917 readers
3277 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jimerson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Am I missing something, or did they just dress up a woman with a prosthetic leg to resemble an android, and remove the dressing around the prosthetic to "prove" she isn't human?

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

What a weird fucking tagline on an article that insinuates a robotic dystopian future.

Although there are some weird horny undertones, so I guess it checks out. Still, weird article all around

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Press X to doubt

[–] toffi@piefed.social 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

"We've now constructed the doomsday machine from the popular novel 'Don't build the doomsday machine'"

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I like the original “torment nexus” phrasing better.

[–] toffi@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago

Ah I was quoting from memory. You're right the torment nexus line is better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In a follow-up event to prove it was a robot, He Xiaopeng had its leg skin cut open in front of a live audience. The robot then walked off the stage.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

that one was AI video i believe.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago

Gen 1 Synth lookin' motherfucker.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What clickbait. Apparently any vaguely capable humanoid robot is a "straight-up Terminator"?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That's the most "Terminator" looking robot I've ever seen.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

If you can't handle me at my Roy Baty you don't deserve me at my Pris Stratton

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They meant that in terms of infiltration they're becoming more humanoid at an exponential level

[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The result is nice and cool. It is the level of modern journalism that is disturbing.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I worry about it. Every year I see more articles with sloppy mistakes that could be caught by any half-drunk editor phoning his job in. Sites springing up publishing 90% slop clearly so someone can keep writing. Not to mention the risks to journalism in a country where the president threatens any group whose speech he doesn't like.

As (i think) Parenti said, now is the time of monsters. Cool robot though. That, genuinely, is crazy impressive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Seriously. How many ways are there to make an humanoid robot out of stainless steel and aluminium?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why does it have boobs though? Is that like extra space For batteries? Why not a bellybutton if we are Going for realism?

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

That's their target market, sex dolls.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Because humans will put tits on anything. I watched a movie about sentient cockroaches, and the girl cockroaches all had tits.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

to be fair to the addition of bazongas, those characters are more 'humans in cockroach costumes' than 'sentient cockroaches.'

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

We all love some badongadongs tho

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Because when humans see a robot with boobs, the comments turn into "hey this robot has tits", and when they don't, the comments turn into "humanity is going to be euthanised by the machines".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

What?

It was a Reddit comment in response to this video (Catbox alt).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

That's a low bar

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago

Pretty sure this grifter had a high bar when he said that.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I’m not saying this because she’s a billionaire, and this is really nothing against her, her looks, or her music, but I never found Taylor Swift to be, like, sexy. She’s quite beautiful and very talented but she’s just not who comes to mind when I think of slinky sexiness.

[–] pyria@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 17 hours ago

She's too doll-like.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago

She's a bit stiff IMHO.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

That looks more like a Terminatrix

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So they skipped the Dalek phase, huh?

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn’t Daleks have little squishy aliens inside them?

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

Yes, Daleks are not robots, they're squishy tentacle space nazis inside mobile battle casing pepperpots that they call War Machines. The Terminator T1 however looks vaguely like such a pepperpot if you squint and are Doctor Who brained.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

Wheeled robots have been the norm for decades, we didn't skip that.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What is the endgame here? People are supposed to buy these? To do what?

The took the fabric off a mechanical device to reveal it was a mechanical device. Disturbing?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd buy one if it would help fight off ice agents.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Pretty sure ICE can afford to but thousands/millions of these cyborgs while normal people might have Alexa speakers.

[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

I read ice giants and thought I’d missed a headline today

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

To do what?

Chores and other stuff we don't want to/can't do. This has been the dream for decades now, so many old encyclopedias with "future tech" chapters show robots caring for people, sometimes as caregivers (for old people, or blind etc), sometimes as entertainers.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Except regular people will struggle to afford food out whilst these will be cleaning rich people's yachts.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Wealth inequality isn't going away anytime soon, but that doesn't mean you can condemn the entire field of humanoid robots as useless/unreachable for the 99%. There's probably going to be a point when a suzuki swift (geo metro for americans) equivalent of a robot will come along.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Wealth inequality isn’t going away anytime soon, but that doesn’t mean you can condemn the entire field of humanoid robots as useless/unreachable for the 99%.

That's exactly what it means. Even a geo metro is a garbage machine that's completely unaffordable for most of humanity and literally destroying the planet. There's nothing to be gained by normalizing inequality and minimizing its very terrible effects.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›