this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
331 points (99.4% liked)

Games

43464 readers
868 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From next month it will start enforcing facial age estimation to allow children to chat with strangers only if they are in their broad age group.

Roblox compared its new system to school cohorts such as elementary, middle school and high school. It will be introduced first in Australia, New Zealand and the Netherlands, where children will be blocked from privately chatting with adults they do not know in real life from next month, and in the rest of the world in early January.

Users will be placed into the following groups: under nine, nine to 12, 13 to 15, 16 to 17, 18 to 20, or 21 and over. Children will be able to chat only with others in their age group and similar ones. For example, a child with an estimated age of 12 will be able to chat only with under-16s. Images and video used for the checks would not be stored, Roblox said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 168 points 4 days ago (4 children)

From next month it will start enforcing facial age estimation to allow children to chat with strangers only if they are in their broad age group.

This is going to backfire spectacularly, what idiots.

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 92 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Right on its face, is it even legal to collect head shots of minors? I know US privacy laws are a joke but there's usually some carve outs that protect minors.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 76 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's illegal to collect ANY data from children under 13. Facial scans are WAY worse than the anonymized use stats those laws were put in place to block

[–] lilas105@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 days ago

It’s illegal to collect ANY data from children under 13.

Really?

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago

Can't protect them too much, though. Otherwise, how would the pedo-in-chief and his ilk get a fresh crop of sex slaves?

[–] lilas105@ttrpg.network 5 points 3 days ago

Gonna be funny when they get hacked and all that info leaks.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

No, no. It makes perfect sense from an investment standpoint. Their actual target audience would love to be able to pay for access to that catalog.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 84 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)

Problem: the game is getting a notoriety for being infested by pedophiles and the developers are actively protecting them.

Solution: send your photographs to the game infested by pedophiles to prove you are a real child!

Fucking. Incredible. If this was written in a manuscript, it would be tossed for being too cartoonishly unrealistic.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I don't allow my kids to play it. It sucks, but the reality is the game has been captured by pedos. I saw too many questionable things when I watched them play. Invariably they will be unsupervised at some point, even for brief periods, so it is not worth the risk.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (3 children)

See, what I figured out is that I don't have to let my son play Roblox. Sure, he might be the "weird" one who's dad doesn't let him. But he was going to be "weird" anyway. That's just how our lives work.

Plus you have AuADHD, having it myself, it makes you vulnerable to predators in ways you can't understand yet.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Hey there's maybe tens of us! Hello fellow reasonable parent!

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

FINALLY a good parent!

Please have more babies!

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I would happily have more babies as children are fun.

Unfortunately that requires a partner who values intelligence, child development, learning and desires children. When I find such a unicorn I'll make as many babies as I can reasonably raise (probably like 2 or three more maximum)

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

We play by the same rule, everyone is weird, no judgement for immutable characteristics. Everyone has challenges, life is already hard, no reason to make it harder for someone.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] offspec@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Relevant username

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (18 children)

God forbid they just shut down the chat function??? Ffs

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] pyria@kbin.melroy.org 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be complaining about this, except I am because Roblox is operated by pedos.

Something extreme measures such as face recognition has to be taken to ensure problems like this won't happen again. However, though, pedophiles having access to data storage containing such verifications can go so wrong on so many levels.

So heres what they should do:

Fire and prosecute all of the pedos. Replace the pedos with trustworthy people to operate Roblox. Then go through verifying.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Option 2.......shut down roblox. It doesn't NEED to exist.

[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I like this option best, tbh.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blave@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

So, Roblox is shutting down? The entire thing is a child sex crime, so unless they’re shutting down, nothing has changed

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Totally sounds like it will only stops kids talking to adults but not adults talking to kids. The creeps already try to get their victims to communicate off-platform using unmoderated services. Unless this blocks the kids' from seeing the adults' messages, the adults trying to fuck with kids could just tell them to use a different messenger.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This. Imagine being a company who suddenly has to do the right thing simply because they can't afford the "we've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas" approach any more.

Litigation may be an awful substitute for regulation, but at least its having some positive effect here.

Shame about the way they're doing it, though. It's a wet dream for politicians and activists in favour of age verification, and for the hackers who'll inevitability get their hands on all of it.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't know if I would call mandatory facial recognition for children online "the right thing."

I would say it is the parent's responsibility to know what their child is doing and what platforms their child is using. If something horrible should happen, my first finger to point at would be the parents not doing anything to prevent it, usually out of negligence, not the Roblox company. A company can only do so much before they begin to assume control of responsibilities a parent has, and I would prefer governments and businesses have as little control over raising children as possible.

This is why many parents used to restrict children's access to the internet to only when the parent can directly monitor it until they were an adult. Sometimes a "family computer" in a common room with the screen plainly visible was the one a child could use. Sadly, it appears this is no longer the case, and more and more parents are ignorant of what their children do.

If someone's dog eats all the pills they left out on the counter and dies, it isn't the fault of the dog and it isn't the fault of the medical company that made the pills, its the fault of the owner for being negligent by not watching the dog and leaving the pills out. This is my opinion.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Not even "can't afford". They're rolling in money. They merely made the calculation that paying lip service to the problem (and farming their user base for even more data to leverage, count on it) could cost less than future lawsuits.

[–] lilas105@ttrpg.network 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's funny how we can just browbeat people into doing what we want.

Rules and laws don't matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

By asking them to verify their age via selfie. We live in the worst time line.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

Come on, it's not like anybody can just create a unique selfie of a kid. They'd have to be artists or something. /s

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

Fuck yeah! I can finally enjoy my Roblox without being harassed by children.

load more comments
view more: next ›