this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
22 points (72.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44412 readers
510 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like, I'm probably answering myself here but I think it is pointed out by gatekeepers who can't stand the idea of community growth and everything should adhere to some other unfound arbitrary way to keep things 'pure' in a community.

When they forget that they too, started out as new and that they too probably have had other people sneer at them for simply being new. So now they go around and pretend this is some kind of ultimate shut-down insult to people who're just trying to contribute to the fediverse by devaluing it by saying "OH U JUST SOME DAY OLD ACCOUNT, NOBODY SHOULD MIND THEM!".

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

Not even a day... Lmfao

[–] trk@aussie.zone 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have literally never seen anyone make a deal out of an account's age, until this post.

I have been recently but only people pointing out spam accounts that are only a day old

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 84 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Because trolls, spammers, and other bad actors will make accounts in mass and use them asap before they get banned.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

FYI it's en masse. It's French

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Unless theyre doing in while in church.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Everyday there's like 5-10 brand new accounts who quickly spam ~20 articles each and stop the same day.

It looks like someone hoping Lemmy takes off so they can sell aged accounts later.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

I use Voyager to access Lemmy, which is heavily based on Apollo for Reddit. And one of the very best things they kept in Voyager is the "New Account Highlightenator", which adds a baby emoji next to a username, with how many days the account has been active. This disappears after a month (I think it is), but it's really, really handy for quickly highlighting whether it's worth paying attention to the shitty opinions being spouted.

Chances are, if it's a bot or a troll, they'll be using a new account. If I see shitty opinion + baby emoji, I'll block and move on.

Other than that, I personally don't really give a shit how long someone's been on here. This is my third account on a third server since I first discovered Lemmy a couple of years ago, and I've only had this one for a couple of months.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

A bit of internet history, account age was a measure of clout on Slashdot.org. Your account ID was posted as part of your replies, so the lower the number, the longer you have been on the site.

Mine personally is in the 1.3M range, and I still read the site and I still see users posting on accounts as low as 500k ID, those have been around since the late 90s.

The site is just a news agrigator at this point with a comment section full of boomers and greybeards (sys admins that probably should consider retiring), but its been my home page for ~20 years and I have no intention of changing that.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

See for example, @nehare@lemmy.world. Account is four hours old, 52 articles posted, zero comments/engagement with the community. Will probably be gone by tomorrow.

Just the other day a bot showed up (galacticWaffle) that was making long, engaging comments on pretty much every post on .World. No one would have known it was a bot if it hadn’t been posting an impossible number of comments per minute. A lot of us engaged with it until people started following it around calling it out. Felt bad man.

I think people just need to know that you are a person before they trust you as a new neighbor. The norm lately is for brand new accounts not to be.

Edit: ten hours later, @nehare has been deleted.

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can’t speak for others but I take few day-old accounts and their opinions with a grain of salt. Often it happens that it is just a troll to bait other people.

[–] MelonYellow@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

Me too. It didn’t used to be like that, but it is like that now. I used to be excited to see new accounts and it was great like that for a while. Now I’m skeptical and always check their history before interacting with new accounts.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Streisand effect. 0/10 shitpost.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because ban evasion is an everyday occurrence here. Someone gets banned for being a jackass, and 9 times out of 10, they come right back with a brand new account and come in hot with inflammatory posts and a chip on their shoulder.

Or trolls just troll - spin up new accounts over and over and throw out rage bait or whatever their shtick is just to be a dick.

Combined with the fact that the fediverse's growth has been a bit stagnant lately, when a bunch of new accounts suddenly pop up, they're rightly met with suspicion until they've established themselves as being here with good intentions.

Not saying new accounts should be ostracized, but given the context of the current state of the fediverse, being suspicious of them is warranted.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

OP's account is 1 day old. Bot detected, mods were need a ban! /s

Welcome to the Lemmy!

[–] pyria@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 days ago

You misspelled 'we' and therefore you're A.I. You must be banned too. /s

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

It’s just a quick and dirty rule of thumb that works surprisingly often. If you meet a jedi from Tatooine, it’s a pretty safe to guess that they’re fed up with sand. Same sort of safe guess works with new accounts too.

[–] nomorebillboards@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

1/3 of Lemmings are bitter losers that have nothing better to do than to belittle people online. 2/3 of them are pretty nice. Ignore the 1/3

[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I tend to abandon all my online accounts from time to time and make new ones for privacy reasons, and IMO everyone should do the same, together with using different names for every website.

Unfortunately the trend is for people using the same accounts that they made when they were 12 for the rest of their lives.

If people were more conscious about their privacy and pseudo-anonymity then I think there would be less bias against new accounts.

I haven't seen this on lemmy, but on reddit there are whole communities that you can't post if you don't have an old account.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

!technology@lemmy.world block posts from accounts under 10 days old.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Ignoring the gatekeepers and the people watching for trolls, there's one other aspect: a lot of people are posting their account anniversaries not to brag, but to celebrate - celebrate leaving the toxic world behind.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Because gatekeeping arseholes gonna gatekeep, I guess?