Stupid question: why are several countries / governments taking these steps? What is in favor of more insights into the communication?
Europe
News and information from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
My guess is a mix of a) techbros like Zuck pushing it because more regulation always makes it easier for big companies who can quickly comply with new laws unlike smaller competitors, b) all governments being run by people 60+ who grew up believing the internet is scary and needs to be regulated as much as possible and c) rising right-wing parties who hope to use that surveillance infrastracture for their goals once in power.
Stuff like chat control is also pushed by companies selling the AI scanning software chat control requires.
IIRC, Thorn had an EU lobbying budget of 24M⬠a couple of years back. Probably hasn't changed since.
When everything goes to shit in a few decades because of global warming, they want to hold all the cards.
Fear of crime. People hope the crazies will be caught online before they hurt us.
Luckily, thanks to Switzerland's direct democracy model, Proton and co. will likely garner enough signatures to challenge this with a referendum. What makes me worry is how they've tried to introduce this without consulting parliament.
I wouldn't be so sure. This is an executive order, not a law. We can't start referenda against executive orders. The underlying legal framework that allows these for surveillance (BΓΌpf) was passed although the people had a chance to reject it. I share your hope, but not the optimism.
Ouch, I wasn't privy to the particulars, nor am I a resident of Switzerland, merely an admirer of how things are run there (usually). I guess the people's notions of liberty aren't as strong there as I had thought!
Ok, I think Bern has had the capital title for too long, they're getting a little loopy, or the bears are wearing the man skin again pretending to be humans like they did in the 30s last time.
Either way, stop emulating the US and China damn you.
This seems like old news to me. The consultation period to the VΓPF revision ran early this year. I remember because we voiced our issues with the revision through our business association Asut. Just looked it up, it was 29. Jan to 6. May.
Almost all the big parties were against it, only The Centre didn't submit a statement : https://www.inside-it.ch/vupf-revision-faellt-in-der-vernehmlassung-komplett-durch-20250507
And the organization Digitale Gesellschaft has since collected 15000 signatures for a petition to the Federal Council : https://www.digitale-gesellschaft.ch/2025/05/18/petition-demokratie-statt-ueberwachungsstaat-an-bundesrat-beat-jans-vorsteher-des-eidgenoessischen-justiz-und-polizeidepartements-ejpd/
I'm not against Tuta also taking a stance, it's good if they do. Its just a bit weird that they marked it "Breaking News". I just wanted to give some context that this is not a new thing, and people are working against the proposal already.
TBH, I always viewed it with suspicion when public commentators in the past were so eager to praise Switzerland as some kind of privacy paradise. Given the current state of affairs, I would much rather have actors in the EU handle my data than actors in Switzerland (although the EU isn't perfect either, and the struggle for privacy is ongoing).
That coldhearted asshole is doing it again wow
Love when people claim certain VPN companies or similar can be trusted.
First of all, they want to make profit. More profit. Always more. So if they don't sell your data now, they will soon.
Secondly, there is no country that will not fuck them up in a timely matter. The only way is to have decentralized, uncontrolable, huge networks. Tor.