this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
33 points (86.7% liked)

Data is Beautiful

7001 readers
2 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I find it a bit weird to have a criteria of "quality of the internet" but not a single point related to discriminations.

So you can be state controlled by the KKK, as long as you have good internet it's a good place to be in?

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which state on the map qualifies as good Internet and controlled by the KKK from your perspective?

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My point was that discriminations (example, if a state was governed by the KKK) are not measured as part of being a good place to live in, which I find ridiculous.

Also if you ask me, all the states qualify considering the political state of the USA.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Ok so you can’t have it both ways.

If all the states qualify by your metric then there is no reason using it as a metric. They all tick the box.

I think you might be able to look at the map and find how their metrics seem to correlate with what you might expect for the places that have a higher rate of discrimination, however

[–] higgsboson@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is a health ranking sponsored by a megacorp. Take it fwiw, but I personally wouldnt put too much stock in it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America%27s_Health_Rankings

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean, it has quality of schools, renewable energy use, those are not more health-related than discrimination.

[–] higgsboson@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

Again, it is funded by a corporation. Not just any corporation, either. If you want to take issue with it, be my guest, but I didnt write it and as I alluded to, I think it is already suspect because of UnitedHealth's involvement.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

horseshit data that intentionally tries to lay the blame on the certain voters for all the problems in the US

not our fellow citizens faults that the school media they learn on, the food consume, the pollution that sickens them, etcetera is all owned by the same groups that owns the voting machines

whole United States is sick with the rot and no amount of data or maps or whatever that helps to divide the country will fix that

not because people voted wrong and are no best and worst states just all the United States with people in them that need to wake up and stand up

the country has republican and democrat lawmakers and an elite group that handles them and the handlers own all the means of production including the elections that is the issue

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Is it laying blame though? I agree with your points, but I took it more as, "No wonder people in those areas vote for populists like Trump - they've been failed utterly by the system, so why wouldn't they be up for tearing it all down?"

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

You're right, but I would bet there is a strong correlation with how people vote to how shitty their living environment is, but as you outlined with other facts, it's just a piece of the problem.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Exactly. Everything you see, hear, read, and experience is through a distorted lens controlled by rich fuckwads who have spent the last several decades strategically acquiring anything that may expose them and hold them to account