this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
390 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31051 readers
1627 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oh, so it's okay the files are released in their entirety? Maybe this statement counts as an order to release the files.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 79 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What happened to, "there aren't any epstein files, it was all a hoax by the radical left?"

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not real but if it is then it's a hoax and if it's not a hoax it's okay to fuck kids.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Because they're older kids, it's not pedophilia, right? Just gotta think of a new angle!

[–] potpotato@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (8 children)

15 is basically 16 is basically 17 and de facto 18. Wham bam, case closed.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Una@europe.pub 61 points 9 months ago

Even better, just release them :3

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago

He doesn't care?

Then tell us who bubba is!? Who'd you blow? Who's knob did you gobble? We're all dying to know, Mr. Doesn't Care.

[–] K3zi4@lemmy.world 46 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Thought they didn't exist, Donny boy?

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It's very simple...

He doesn't care if the files, which don't exist, get released, which he could do unilaterally, but he won't, since he doesn't care, because he's not in them, and they're a political hit job by the democrats, or they would be, if they were real, but they aren't.

Got it?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He's tried every other argument, now he's trying reverse psychology again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aarRJaay@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Demented old fool has forgotten he's in them

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nah. I'm sure he knows he's in them. He probably just thought he could tell one of his sycophants to remove or redact his name like they could just do a "find all" and delete. He probably thinks his name has been scrubbed.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 9 months ago

They probably did that but it didn't match DONNI TEE which is how that email got released

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 31 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maybe the only part he was worried about getting out was him sucking a guy's dick

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why should he care if they prove he committed heinous crimes? Nothing is going to be done about it

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Sucking a guy's dick isn't a crime, but sex with a minor sure is.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He has already been convicted of multiple other felonies and doesn’t serve time. Why should this be any different?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

I don't know that it would be, but he sure seems to think so. I think him trying so desperately to cover it up for so long has made it more damaging than it would have been if he'd just owned it when his cult was clamoring for the files to be released. He'd downplay it with his usual word salad, news articles would be written about how terrible it was, and nothing of consequence would happen to him. Now, though? It's not just about the horrendous crimes, but his betrayal of his conspiracy theorist cult. Maybe it would still amount to nothing, but he hasn't done himself any favors by alienating his cultists.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how Trump will face repercussions for these crimes when he hasn't for any other crimes. Who is going to prosecute him? What is the plan if the files prove he committed heinous crimes? Since he's clearly immune to all consequences of crimes, I think he's more concerned about people thinking he's gay

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

IF anything happens to him, it will be because he has eroded the trust of his conspiracy theorist cult by trying to cover up his pedophilia more than the pedophilia itself. A lot of his power is derived from his cult, which the Republicans are terrified of alienating. If he loses enough of their support, Republicans won't be so hell-bent on protecting him at all costs. It's a big "if."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Which is what they just said?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

Yes but nothing is going to be done about it

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Suuuure he doesn't care..

(That's why he's got Pam Bondi digging through them to find dirt on the Democrats.)

He's gotta act cool, no matter what..

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 21 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I'm 100% sure there are democrats in the files. However, the fact that they haven't released any den names or tried to prosecute any sure is interesting.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Would be difficult to use the actual documents to pick and choose only Democrats to prosecute while protecting Republicans. Might as well just make everything up at at that point.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago

Isn't that what they are already doing? They have been cherry-picking dems and blue states to prosecute for everything else. Even the redistricting in Texas is being looked past while they turn around and do it to California.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So? I'm sure there is too. Release them all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

He thinks the ones his fbi has redacted are the ones we're gonna go with

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 11 points 9 months ago

Translation: he really, really cares.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 10 points 9 months ago

After dodging this issue for over a year? Press X to doubt.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 10 points 9 months ago

That's not what he's telling his toadies in Congress

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There are no consequences for anything that he’s done, so why would he care?

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 9 months ago

He probably panicked at some point because of it, but realised what country he's king in.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 months ago

gets punched in face

IT DUSNT HURRRT

[–] FrederikNJS@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The Narcissist's Prayer

  • That didn't happen.
  • And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
  • And if it was, that's not a big deal.
  • And if it is, that's not my fault.
  • And if it was, I didn't mean it.
  • And if I did, you deserved it.

by Dayna Craig

We're at line 3, it seems

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 6 points 9 months ago

Good news everyone!

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, he definitely seems pretty sanguine about it.

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

lol, we shall see when that order comes across his desk.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You don't think that means they are done purging every copy of the files in existence of any mention of people in his corner?

load more comments
view more: next ›