this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
203 points (98.6% liked)

Today I Learned

25785 readers
1225 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was listening to an episode of Behind the Bastards about the slave labor used by Volkswagen in the 1970s and 1980s and this fact came up. Here's the relevant Wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Brazil

Excerpt:

Out of the 12 million Africans who were forcibly brought to the New World, approximately 5.5 million were brought to Brazil between 1540 and the 1860s.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 37 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

No Europeans colonized any land in the New World for the sake of tourism. They all came to make money out of various forms of plantation economies. And the economic engine for plantations to be profitable is slavery.

That's why all countries with plantation-sustaining climates on the American continent have sizeable black and mestizo populations: they were ALL part of the slave trade.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I'm broadly aware of that and I know some of the specifics of sugar cane plantations in Hawaii, for example. But I had no idea the sheer extent of it in Brazil.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

The average lifespan of a slave after arriving in Brazil was 7 years. It was absolutely brutal. That and the size of the territory used in plantations are what explain the extent of slave trade there.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The majority of slaves went to central and south America. Portugal, Spain, France, and the Netherlands (along with Britain) were all involved in what was likely the most gruesome slave trade in human history. In Brazil's case it was Portugal that purchased and moved those slaves over.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

In the podcast I listened to covering modern times, it was Volkswagen doing it. The case literally came to trial THIS YEAR, 2025!

[–] TriplePlaid@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

For which Volkswagen was fined approximately $30 million... Compared to having grossed €59.5 billion in 2024... Nothing more than a slap on the wrist. Cost of doing business, you could say.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

Not surprising since colonial violence is the foundation of capitalism.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

I had no idea. I’m not even sure whether to call it a failure of us education system. We focus on our own country’s actions, which is probably appropriate, and there is mention of other countries, but we’re left with the impression the slave trade was predominantly us. Not to let our own history off the hook, but it would be better to understand the vast scale of slavery

[–] Humana@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Let's also not forget many countries that today don't have a visible black population were also very active in slavery.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Argentines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Uruguayans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Chileans

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Also why when they abolished slavery they abolished slavery for the sake of the ideology of slavery. They never cared for the victims or the people enough and that's why their is still systemic discrimination till this day. Segregation in the USA wasn't abolished until the 1900s.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The US likes to make itself be the biggest drama queen in the world when it comes to racism, the Brazil suffers much more with it to this day.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (18 children)

I admit I haven't had a lot of exposure to Brazil's history.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Having lived in both places, I can say Brazil clearly has racism, but it doesn't come close to the near apartheid of the south of US. By a long shot.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Erm that absolutely does exist. Black Brazilians are killed by police at far higher rates, earn far less, and remain under-represented everywhere from universities to Congress. Calling that “not even close” just compares signage, not reality. The closest to the US south would the Nordeste. This area despite being made of several huge states, is more black, more poor, and mostly forgotten from public representation and support. Would you say the USA South is forgotten and poor?

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Erm that absolutely does exist.

Are you talking about racism existing? Because:

I can say Brazil clearly has racism

Moving on:

Calling that “not even close” just compares signage, not reality.

I would love to see how you arrived at that conclusion.

Would you say the USA South is forgotten and poor?

That has no relationship with racism at all. But to quench your curiosity, a resounding Yes.

I can't even begin to describe to you the absolute palpable, day to day, quality that racism takes form in the south of US. Apartheid-lite really is a better describer, as it encompasses more than racism. I was so taken aback by the state of racial affairs, I don't think anything could have prepared me for it. There's just so much that never make it to the media, because media reports the extraordinary, and what's most shocking is exactly what they consider ordinary. The ordinary racism is just mind-boggling.

[–] bobgobbler@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh so you don’t even live in the United States.

Lol

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 4 days ago

Where did you get that, you absolute donut?

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

"Did you know that Arabs were also slavers? They were much worse than us! Also America freed the slaves, and if you think about it, it was really the negroes that did it to themselves!"

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 days ago

Yes... So were the Greek and others. Europe didn't start the slave trade, it already existed when Portugal started exploring the coast of Africa. Portugal just... Optimized the business.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

If you're like me, those quotes mean: This is something really stupid that other people say.

I'm not sure others are reading it that way.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 10 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I used to love Behind the Bastards until Robert started saying "Right?" at the end of each fucking sentence. Right? So here's what happened, bla bla bla. Right? Right? RIGHT?!

It gets so fucking jarring that I can't listen to it anymore. I want to reach out through email and slap his face or something, see if he can get unstuck somehow.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I never noticed that and now I fear that's all I'll hear ...

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago

I'm so sorry. 🙏

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I completely get that. I stopped watching a YouTube channel I liked because the host said "genuinely" way too much lol

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago

I am exceedingly harsh in YouTube comments on channels that do this. I feel like an asshole, because I am, but at the same time, someone's gotta say your breath stinks and have a mint, you feel me.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"Legitimately," reporting for duty. It's just so damned useful. Also, "indeed."

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

When people overuse stuff like that it makes me think...should I not trust you if you don't say it? Like are your default statements illegitimate which is why you feel the need to stress that THIS statement is real?

Obviously people don't mean it like that, it's just a dumb quirk in my brain making me annoyed by it. I even get annoyed by some of my own linguistic habits

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

THAT'S WHAT'S BOTHERING ME! It's so servile. It's like, no confidence. Tell us, don't ask. You're the story teller, so tell the fucking story like. The story is good, no need to convince me further.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

If anything it's probably overcompensation. "Even if you ignore me, at least make sure you hear this point."

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Yeah, I almost didn't continue with the podcast because of him. I struggle with him sometimes.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 0 points 4 days ago

Brazil number 1!

load more comments
view more: next ›