this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
186 points (96.0% liked)

World News

50886 readers
2319 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/45649428

Archived

[...]

Ultra cheap e-commerce platforms Temu and fast fashion brand Shein are selling products made from Chinese cotton despite the high risk of links to slavery.

More than 80 per cent of Chinese cotton is produced in the Xinjiang province where an estimated more than 800,000 Uighurs are enslaved.

This masthead has seen multiple examples of cotton products made in China available for sale on Temu and Shein, including clothing and bedding.

Australian Human Rights Institute director Justine Nolan said there was a heightened risk of slavery with any cotton products made in China.

“You just couldn’t say the risk is low when you’ve got over 80 per cent of cotton coming from Xinjiang,” she said. “That’s a high risk.”

[...]

China produces about 20 per cent of the world’s cotton, with about 84 per cent coming from the Xinjiang province. The US banned cotton from the Xinjiang province in 2022 under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act.

Ms Nolan said retailers and manufacturers would need to ascertain whether the cotton was produced in China or was sourced from a supply chain outside of China.

“The reality of actually finding that out is very difficult,” she said. “There’s a heightened risk for any cotton products coming out of China that they are tainted by forced labour.”

Conversely, Ms Nolan said Australia had a very strong cotton industry. “I would say cotton coming out of Australia is a hell of a lot safer than cotton coming out of China.”

[...]

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Elextra@literature.cafe 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Honestly, I would not be surprised by this statistic for these companies.

Most clothing is likely made from cheap, unregulated, likely exploited individuals, slavery ties or not. China, Vietnam, etc.

To really bring in your ethics into clothes shopping you have to be privileged or thrift everything second hand. It is not cheap to ethically shop for clothes.

Shout out for Prana for introducing the concept of Fair Trade to me.

However, it is not to say everyone wearing other clothing brands should feel guilty or anything. Most people are living paycheck to paycheck. Its not easy affording >$25 ethically sourced shirts when you can get another brand new shirt for $3, $5, whatever.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I love how Kotn has ethically sourced Danny Trejo

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago

Expanding on whay youre saying:

There is only a certain amount of responsibility we can lay on a person doing their best and still not earning enough to afford to live with fully ethical sourcing of everything in their lives. It sucks that this is the system we are in, and we can all take steps to try to reduce our "unethical consumption" footprint, but ultimately the largest blame must lie with the powerful industries that happily benefit from unethical sourcing, the powers and politicians that permit or even reward it, and the forces both political and corporate that fight to keep all wages low.

This all bears huge similarities to carbon pollution, where powers have worked to shift the sense of responsibility off of themselves and onto the populace/consumers.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It’s only a bad thing when it makes the USA look bad, otherwise slavery and genocide is just fine.

-ML

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

ML doesnt think the labor used to create these items is slave labor. ML generally thinks its hypocritical for one of the few countries to have legal systemic slavery to going around claiming all of its "enemies" use slave labor. ML also likes to note how cultural differences often are exaggerated or reframed to use as nationalistic propaganda.

America puts a lot of effort into trying to convince the rest of the world that China is a horrible country.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 1 points 4 days ago

ML (on Lemmy) has a singular goal, and everything else comes second: crush the west, especially the people—double for the innocent ones.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

Damn. Wait until you hear about iPhones. Lmao

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, and? Hasn't this been know since like. A decade or so? Hasn't this been like this since it's founding?

Everyone knows, and so far, nobody able to stop this has cared.

This isn't news, this is just sad

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Remember the building collapse in Bangladesh filled with textile workers that got crushed?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rana_Plaza_collapse

I remember clothing industry executives going on the news tearfully saying they didn't know about it and will change things.

Uh uh.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Oh I remember that, and I remember right away thinking "buuuuuuuulshit you won't change anything, you'll just make sure any news won't come out as easy next time"

[–] bassad@jlai.lu 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It is not new but we need permanent reminders to not buy these stuff.

An other reason to avoid buying stuff from them is that 80% of their products are illegal or out of EU regulation, like toxic components in kids toys, from a recent survey from french customs, after someone reported pedo sex dolls on shein online store.

[–] GaryGhost@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Is AliExpress no different?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

That's why I only buy electronics on AliExpress.

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 4 days ago

I would say it is the same according to several other reports, but the Australian institute just didn't investigate specifially AliExpress in that case I would say.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Close, it's "because", not "despite."

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh yes as opposed to the cotton grown by executives and lawyers

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Nothing in between lawyers and literal slaves?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago

I believe everyone would use slaves if there were no moral consequences, hence the demand for humanoid robots.

The filthy rich, having zero morals or empathy, happily use literal slaves in any country they can get away with it, also explaining their obsession with building humanoid robots. Robots which they imply will be affordable for everyone, but which will only ever be available for the filthy rich to have and use, in turn furthering their plan to make literal slaves of all of us.

[–] dogbert@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Uh huh, im sure this western colonial state is super worried about human rights abuse…

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 points 6 days ago

You certainly aren't. Hows the whataboutism working for you champ?