this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
160 points (96.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44399 readers
531 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why is the Republican party so content with denying healthcare as a human right, and trying everything they can to harm people who need any sort of assistance? Like.... How do they do it? How much are we talking here when we speak about tax savings for them?

Pretend I am rich? Like how much money am I getting back by Republicans kicking men off healthcare or destroying insurance for those who need it most. It must be alot right?

(page 2) 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leftascenter@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do Republicans hate the poor so much?

For the rich: money reduces empathy. There a a few funny studies on the matter, including one on lottery winners. Plus the very wealthy live in their own bubble.

For the poor: propaganda. Lack of education in logic, sociology, macroeconomics, human relationships. A complete education is not all math and literature and hard science.

trying everything they can to harm people who need any sort of assistance?

The power-hungry want power, control, coercion. Through media power, cronyism they allied with the ultra rich who have power and want docile workers.

The dominated Republicans are fighting the ghost of people abusing the system, afraid of change, hiding in conservatism, backing into 1930s racism. They didn't think the powerful Republicans would cut their help, only do something about their fears.

Pretend I am rich? Like how much money am I getting back by Republicans kicking men off healthcare or destroying insurance for those who need it most. It must be alot right?

It's not about economics: healthcare and general welfare have a net positive impact, up to the point of housing homeless people costs globally less than having them on the street.

Personal gain is really at stake only when said service is repurchased by friends of the government, e.g. medical research, police, military, roads anything can go. Helping the poor can't really be sold. Policing them, yes.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does money reduce empathy or is lack of empathy just a serious advantage in acumulating money?

[–] leftascenter@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes.

But foremost, money makes you an asshole, as measured with people who had little/no control over their wealth (e.g. lottery winners.)

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or those were previously just assholes without money? Nice people who win the lottery likely don't stay rich for long because they use that money to help people they know.

[–] leftascenter@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So I read the study, first of all the paper aknowledges that there's a several point swing in voting preference between non winners and people who won less than £500 which strongly implies people who play the lottery are more likely to vote right wing to begin with. Secondly even for large wins the swing was only around 18%. At worst money does not make everyone a bad person, more like 1/5 people.

[–] leftascenter@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you read one study, and didn't know social science are about mean changes overe a population and not absolute changes on individuals.

Good start, now I'll let you dig some more on the issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You can't hoard wealth and distribute it too.

The average republican is not super wealthy, of course, but they are manipulated and controlled by those who are.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

They weren't raised right.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Protestantism.

Protestantism is Christianity but Jesus is Replaced with Capitalism. If you're rich, God has chosen you. If you're poor you have definitely committed every sin.

To help the poor is therefore a betrayal of God.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Protestantism.

Protestantism is Christianity but Jesus is Replaced with Capitalism. If you're rich, God has chosen you. If you're poor you have definitely committed every sin.

To help the poor is therefore a betrayal of God.

That is very much not Protestantism. Protestantism is simply the branches of Christianity that descend from the Reformation in the 1500s, “Protesting” what they saw as corruption and even heresy in the Roman Catholic Church. Broadly speaking, Christianity falls into three major categories: the Roman Catholic Church (with the pope and whatnot), Orthodoxy, and Protestantism. Protestant churches come in many different flavors.

Most (if not all) of the most progressive and Christ-like churches are Protestant.

What you’re talking about is Prosperity Gospel. Which is completely antithetical to Christian theology, but that doesn’t stop greedy megachurch preachers and televangelists from pushing it onto ignorant people who know nothing about their own faith.

Edit: Seeing the downvotes, allow me to clarify. I’m not saying all Protestant churches are progressive. As I stated in my follow-up, the least progressive churches are also Protestant. And the behaviors being decried are indeed carried out by Protestants. But I’m saying that Protestant is a very broad category that is not encapsulated by the description I was replying to. The accusation shouldn’t be leveled at Protestantism, but rather at Evangelicals or specifically those who hold to Prosperity Gospel.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Sorry, not convinced. Wait, not sorry either.

All the most terrible christians I have ever had the displeasure of interacting with were Protestants, whereas Catholics are just sorta there, honestly. (and I won't comment on Orthodoxy because it's too foreign. Like they might be terrible or amazing, I just never interacted with them, not a thing in my neck of the woods at all)

It is Evangelical Churches boosting fascist candidates in the US and my own country of Brazil.

If people want to convince me that Protestantism ISN'T authoritarian ultracapitalism in Church Clothes, they'll have to show me something that stands stronger than the entirety of the past 10 years

Trump, Bolsonaro, all boosted by Protestants.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

Like I said, Protestant churches come in many flavors. MANY flavors.

What you’re saying is like, “Every quadrilateral I’ve seen lately has four equal sides and four right angles, I think you’re wrong about them only needing four sides.”

Evangelicals are (generally) Protestants (although “Evangelical” isn’t really any sort of organized body but rather something people identify as), but not all Protestants identify as Evangelicals. Those who preach the Prosperity Gospel would profess to be Protestant or Evangelical, but not all Protestants or even all Evangelicals buy into Prosperity Gospel.

Again, the most progressive denominations of Christianity are Protestant. That said, so are the least progressive denominations. It’s a huge category.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I strongly disagree.

There are Protestants that are quite different. That is mostly protestants in the USA, which I doubt they are Christians at all.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can guarantee you that all protestants here in Brazil are like that.

In fact when you consider that protestantism started as a defence of capitalism when the Catholic Church was condemning it -- It's hard to believe the faith isn't that at its core.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Protestantism started as a reaction to the Catholic church monetizing "Salvation" through indulgences. The Lutherans had some other gripes, but that was a big one. Evangelical protestantism is pretty evil though. It originated in America and has spread everywhere it can. Looking it up American branded Evangelical protestantism is the main kind in Brazil. It looks like less than five percent are identified as European originating branches.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

They pretend that its not a zero sum game but they act like it is a zero sum game.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Because we humans are social animals that like seeing others happy and dislike seeing others unhappy. Same goes for seeing animals.

Conservatives have convinced themselves or have been convinced by others that everyone is solely responsible for their own success. Or they pretend to believe this.

When they see pain in the world the only thought they can have is: This person did something wrong.

In reality meanwhile things aren't so easy. People have responsibility in achieving a happy life. But there are a myriad of factors that make life easier or harder. But you all probably know that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I heard they love the poor when they vote against their own interests.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I would say the argument is that they feel they're paying more for people who don't deserve it. That the government and these businesses are constantly subsidizing by taking their pay cheque and handing it to people who refuse to work or decided to do drugs or making other bad life choices. The right tends to view things at an individual level whereas the left view things as a group. Both are right and wrong. If you're paid $60,000 a year and some goes to a safe injection site, more goes to some carbon tax that nobody is really tracking, more goes to some dark slush fund nobody knows about. Over the years we all just get bitter and angry

In my experience most poor people are their voting base who the fuck knows why

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 3 points 1 week ago

Same reason why you hate feminism. Bigotry.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

They want people hating trans and gay people instead.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

To feel better about their own pathetic life.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›