this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
904 points (97.8% liked)

Comic Strips

20212 readers
1175 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 92 points 1 week ago (3 children)

But also… … …do they?

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 7 points 1 week ago

This is like when RedBan asked some stupid ass question and Tony rides him for it and then pauses, looks at the bucket pull and repeats the question.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 86 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah but is your dick bigger than her putty is deep.

Think majorasterriblefate, think!

[–] radish@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] robotica@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Bad women's anatomy

[–] NullPointerException@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Interesting question. I knew two twin sisters and they didn’t have the same boob type.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So they did not have twin peaks?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

...of my dreams, and into my car!!!

not after one decided to become the log lady

[–] DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but did they have same size dicks? /s

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago

So the twins didn’t have twin twins, eh?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

It's true, this is a well-documented phenomenon:

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Were they otherwise identical? Or?

[–] NullPointerException@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The twins? Yes. The type when we meet the first time we can’t differentiate. But one had more torpedo boobs with puffy nipples and the other, not.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Please share you data acquisition methods with the rest of the class

[–] NullPointerException@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, nothing worth saying. They had a third sister, which I dated for a while. You don’t need much to notice boobs. We went to their summer house and, before sleeping, they were not using bras. That’s it. Another time, I learned they also didn’t shave the same way down there, but this was just booze and giggles.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago

Next time just lie.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Did you compare them side by side?

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, artist should've added "identical" in there. I went to school with a pair of twins, like even had the same fucking first name, but they could not be further apart. Like one became big finance bro and is tall, the other is a very well regarded tattoo artist and is not tall at all.

[–] Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wait a second! You're telling me that twins had the same first name?? WTF? Why? That doesn't make any sense

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 week ago

I know of twins named Brittany and Brittney. Their parents are idiots.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Weird parents I suppose? It was strange in elementary, but they started going by their middle names in high school

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Probably not if one of them is a woman.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 4 points 1 week ago
[–] spykee@lemmings.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This one, ladies and gentlemen.

Women can have dicks. Dick having people can call themselves women.
..and vice-versa.
I've personally been with 'at least' two "women", who not only had bazookas, but also equally impressive groin-ferret, that made me happy and cry at the same time.
On second thought, it is very much possible, one of male twins might just realise he is a she but refuses for any down-surgery. Totally possible. We have to be open minded.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

Not the punchline I wanted, but perhaps the one we all needed. Perhaps.

(I still prefer the original punchline)

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago

Interestingly enough, my language has a word for gender-specific twin pairs (ie. dvīņubrāļi would be twin brothers), but not really when twins are different gender

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How come no matter what color the shampoo is the lather is always white??

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Ooh, I like this one! I think it's for the same reason that liquids like egg whites, sea water, and even some broths can be clear when at rest but opaque when frothy. And the reason for that is the same as the reason why a straw in a glass of still water looks like it's broken: refraction!

So, when light enters or leaves a medium at an angle, it is bent by the transition between the medium it's entering and what it's leaving. And it's not a lossless process; some of the light that reaches the boundary is reflected instead by the medium, some is reflected internally, and some is absorbed by the medium.

With a single large bubble, you wouldn't notice this; the boundary is tiny, there's way more of one medium (air) than the other (soap), and the bubble's shape means that the light actually tends to bend back to its original trajectory again coming out. But if there are many, many thousands of tiny bubbles, with pretty similar amounts of soap and air, some sharing boundary layers so that light can enter and leave at different angles, reflecting light all over the place and refracting it from everywhere, you're just going to get that reflected mess.

And even if the soap is dyed, that wimpy little amount of dye isn't filtering the color of the light enough for it to overwhelm the combined color of all the other light in the room; which, in most cases, basically average out to white.

oh i know exactly where you're leading with these questions and i am not playing mr hilter.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Because you're always using the shampoo for the same thing, perv.

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Its shampoo cum.

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago

hire that guy! he thinks outside the box

[–] waterore@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What cruel trick to be identical in every way but that!

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] waterore@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 6 points 1 week ago

I dont know and I'm not screwing my search history with this but I think they'd have very similar members.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 6 points 1 week ago

these eyes are super unsettling

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It might depend on their diet.

Nature vs nurture, I guess?

[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Specifically what about their diet? Please I need an answer.

load more comments (1 replies)

Fuck I never thought of that...

[–] TomasEkeli@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'm sorry but if you're going to respond we need to know is the differential large or ?

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

That girl in the middle knows the answer and won't tell.

load more comments
view more: next ›