this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
50 points (96.3% liked)

Global News

5386 readers
444 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Last I checked, that isn't up to him.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

That won't stop him from acting like it is. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 20 points 2 months ago

Not buy enough American weapons.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Resist Israel with actual bans of airspace/ports use to assist Israel. Also, Spain is leader in solar transition.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

energy transition, but if the boat floats... wait until the orcas sink it.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They have been pretty vocal about not being able to afford the 5% GDP spending target.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

5%??????? That's insane isn't it supposed to be 2?

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 6 points 2 months ago

A NATO summit earlier this year increased it. Basically over the next few years, NATO countries will have to spend more on defense. The 5% isn't all direct military funding though. Some infrastructure that contributes indirectly to defense can be counted toward the 5%.

It became 2% after the Russian invasion of Crimea, but it was increased to 3.5% (+1.5% infrastructure) this year, due to threats from both Trump and Putin.

[–] valtia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

5% but 3% can be fulfilled with infrastructure spending like roads and bridges that can support tanks

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 months ago

How about we kick the US out instead? It's not like we can trust them to have our backs anyway.

[–] shani66@ani.social 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It astounds me that America has all this power in so many international institutions. America was much closer to the bad guys in ww2 until we were randomly attacked and dragged into the war. And since then we've been a violent, destabilizing force in the world. We are not and were never the good guys or even vaguely trustworthy.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

America was much closer to the bad guys

Somebody's never heard of lend-lease, the only reason the allies had the industrial capacity to hold Germany back.

until we were randomly attacked and dragged into the war.

They were attacked in retaliation for an oil embargo against Japan that would have brought japans campaign in China/the Pacific screeching to a halt

The US is far from perfect and was far from perfect in the 30s and 40s. There's plenty to criticize without spreading misinformation. I'm not sure if you're ignorant of history or just plain lying, but I am sure you're not helping anyone.

[–] shani66@ani.social 1 points 2 months ago

The second part was admittedly an exaggeration, but the first part isn't. America was all in on fascism and even nazism before being forced to actually join the war and those became enemies. America remained 'neutral' in ww2 for years (it was 3, yeah?), but it was the ruling class of America that empowered the Nazis and Nazi parties ran amok in America. Still do, but that's besides the point. iirc we didn't end corpo collaboration until after we actually joined the war.