this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
815 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26422 readers
2652 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Proposed legislation behind the impending US government shutdown contains provisions that would ban federal funding for transgender adults, as well as youngsters.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EldenLord@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

At this point, even the most die-hard republicans should be horribly ashamed by the fact this "man" is even allowed to participate in politics.

Eh, who am I kidding? Few bad apples spoil the bunch, and it‘s already happened worldwide. Trump has become only a symptom of the wretched corruption that is everywhere.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Surely this is the last group of people whose rights he want to remove. Surely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wait I thought you had medbeds for everyone?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PKscope@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Shut it down, pussy.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Democrats should threaten shut the government down unless they release the Epstein files. Fuck it all, make the Republicans have to tell their constituents they were willing to shut the government down to protect the Pedophile in Chief

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That would require the democrats to act as an actual opposition party, which they have basically never done.

EDIT: I apologize, I must make a correction, the democrat party did act as an actual opposition party from approximately 1861 until the early 20th century, but I don't think anyone should cite that as a proud example.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aggelalex@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Do it. Shut the government down. I don't think you got the guts to give away your power in protest, you orange bum

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It must be TACO Tuesday…

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I feel like it's a misdirection. Like, this isn't what he really wants. This is a ploy to get/do something way, way worse. Or use this to cover up the Epstein files or something. He'll use the shutdown and a hot button topic to get what he sees as a big fish...

[–] pika@lemmy.today 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Eliminating all trans people is what he really wants. The genocide of trans people is already happening in the US. When trans people don't have access to trans-related medical care, they die at very high rates. When ~~trans~~ people are terrorized by their government and their neighbors, they lash out. When ~~trans~~ people are labeled as terrorists, there can be no peace.

The Mormons, Southern Baptists, and some Jewish groups just asked the Supreme Court to consider trans people exempt from equal protections clause of the 14th amendment.

The genocide of trans people and immigrants is happening. Now. Today.

Government shutdown is also what he really wants, because he wants unrest and violence to justify sending the military to cities to carry out his nazi terrorism, declare a national emergency, and hold a third term in office.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why couldn’t it also be what he really wants? What part of anything happening in the US and anything coming from the right could possibly signal that they don’t want this?

Conservatism is a cancer and fascism is perfectly happy to turn that knob up to 11.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

How dreadful! For many trans people it'll endanger their lives.

It all reminds me of what was happening in Russia over the decades, just smashed into an impossible timeline. Small steps lead to irrevocable disasters.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Shut it down so adults can start a new one.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Gotta love that freedom and small government

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Shut down the government because of 1% of the population. What a loser.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm actually for that, but a different 1%, that's actually hurting everyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

What about the Epstein files? Someone should remind him.

[–] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 1 month ago

Let him TACO this. His base wants other people to suffer, not themselves.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Mike Johnson shut the government down to prevent the release of the Epstein files. Full stop.

[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

lets refuse to fund his magic bed

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago

Also, dems should demand epstein files be released to prevent a shutdown.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well, sure, but remember that Harris was so terribly transphobic many people just plain didn’t vote at all! Which is obviously the Democrats’ fault for running such a terribly transphobic candidate.

And yes, this option that we have here, this - ban transgender federal funds, make trans people terrorists - was the only other choice available. But that still means it’s the Democrats’ fault because otherwise you’d have to blame people who didn’t do the one most important thing they could to prevent this and obviously we can’t blame them.

Look, we’ll call it even and should we somehow make it to the midterms next year we’ll all decide to protest by not voting again. Then the Democrats will really start paying attention to us! Pretty soon after that, bang-zoom! Workers will seize the means of production and . . do something with chains. Ride bikes maybe? Anyway, sounds fun.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

On the one hand I agree, on the other I'm so angry and tired of either hearing that my issues aren't important enough to do something about (the line told to Millennials during pretty much every election - presidential and otherwise - from Bush onward outside of Biden and Obama on things like housing prices and student loan debt/price of college) or that as a transgender person, we need to let the Republicans do a little genocide and removal of our rights and freedoms as a treat or else the "moderate Republicans" won't vote for the Democratic candidate (are the "moderate Republicans" in the room with us right now?). And then we get blamed for the Dems losing one way or another regardless. Either the Millennials didn't vote hard enough, or our demands of things like affordable housing and protection of minorities' rights were "too radical and lost the Dems the moderate vote."

I still voted for Harris because it was either the Dems rein in the fascists to some extent at the federal level or the only safe places being Democrat run states, but the Dems absolutely threw us under the bus as a "worthy sacrifice" to court a mythological voting base that hasn't existed in decades - if it ever did at all - and I can't really blame people for being sick and tired of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 11 points 1 month ago (11 children)

With coalition building and solidarity like this, I can't imagine how they lost.

No point in electing dems if they dont fix anything, prosecute crimes against humanity or coups, etc. They haven't shown willingness so far.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Trill88@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Why so fragile

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›