this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
295 points (99.7% liked)

politics

31740 readers
4043 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 121 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“We don't need separation of faith and politics. We don't need separation of church and state."

Yeah, yeah you do.

[–] Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I bet he wants separation of church and state for every religion except one.

[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotta narrow it down more than that. Can't let Catholics or Mormons slide in on the lawmaking either!

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 11 points 1 year ago

Protestant too broad; only this singular evangelical church will be allowed!

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 74 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those who established that separation had lived in a world without it and knew how it negatively affected both the government and the religions. Saying it's not needed shows a combination of ignorance of history and a desire to be the one religious group who gains power over others.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Yes, the founders knew of what they spoke, since The Inquisition was still ongoing in their lifetimes.

There is no way they set up this country as a secular country by accident. Or didn't mention Jesus once in the Constitution as some kind of "oversight", and actually really meant to imply this was a xtian nation, even if the Treaty of Tripoli later spells it out that we are not a xtian nation...

[–] RFKJrsBrainworm@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 year ago

Only an asshole trying to fist fuck God into politics would say something so stupid

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 year ago

These fucking morons forget that the primary, actual, material reason that the Founding Fathers did the whole... seperation of church and state thing?

Yeah, yeah, it was to prevent the myriad groups of extremist sects of Christianity that comprised the early US... from fucking oppressing and killing each other, via the government.

Remove that seperation, and within half a decade we will literally have Y'all Qaedas for each fucking cult and denomination fire bombing each other, doing mass sectarian violence amongst themselves and those they all view as heretics.

I guess it will be funny(?) if we end up with the Mormon War, round 2.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

Pay yo taxes then.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Uproot religion!

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 1 year ago

I don’t want your Republican Jesus.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This means their religion is now of political concern. They forfeit their protections in doing this

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Explaining to Ayatollah Khomemi that he's going to be hoisted on his own petard

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think what this indicates is that he doesn’t comprehend what “separation” means in this context. Or “church” for that matter.

Would he really have no issues with the Pope ruling the US by papal decree? Or the king of England (the leader of the Anglican/Episcopalian church)?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Did they forget that every time a king changed the kingdom's religion it was convert or die?

Ima run for senate and make the state religion Satanism

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Twatley can blow it out his ass.