this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
222 points (98.3% liked)

politics

31093 readers
1680 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 107 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So they don’t support free speech? I thought that’s why this guy was a martyr somehow.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah...these people really don't understand irony, at all.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fascists don't believe in the meaning of words.

They are free to play in bad faith, while libs waste time and energy debating their bad faith arguments; exactly what the bad faith actor wanted.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly.

Words are nothing but weapons to them, tactics to distract, demoralize, dogwhistle, whatever.

You do not speak to a fascist with words.

You speak to them with a fucking baseball bat.

... not like they would ever do any good with a working jaw anyway.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It's only about Nazi free speech. They'll pretend we all need to allow their free speech, no matter how hateful, because, "free speech".

But they don't have any intent of YOU having free speech.

That's the paradox of tolerance that Popper talked about....

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Didn't republicans make truth social and the other rightwing shitholes specifically because "tHeY'rE cEnSoRiNg Us" for saying shit more vile than what they're throwing a fit about now?

It's almost like they want censorship for everyone but themselves.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They want their speech out of their hate-infested echo chambers so that they can start infecting more of the populace.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They would love it if everyone was forced to be exposed to their spew. They think people being to ignore/block/unaffiliate with them is "censorship".

It’s almost like they want censorship for everyone but themselves.

Almost like? No, that's the actual point.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The Nazi playbook.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago

The Snowflake Bill

[–] don@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

For a state as homophobic as Louisiana, they sure do love gobbling them some old man dementia cock

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And dead man cock if he's any indication.

[–] RaoulDuke@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

I bet every MAGAt has a small peepee.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

I demand Louisiania republiQans shut the fuck up

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fat bald old white man. Checks out.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

And I demand Trump be arrested

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

party of free speech

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Wait, I thought this party was about trying to legalize comedy again. Because no one was allowed to laugh prior to Taco being back in office.

What happened?

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Higgins, who chairs the House Oversight Committee’s subcommittee on federal law enforcement, argued restrictions are not censorship but a defense of constitutional order. “The reasonable restriction of public statements that lie far beyond the standards of our own society is not an oppression of free speech. It is, rather, the protection of free speech,” he claimed.

Insert 1984 slogan here.

*edit: glad he's dead.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 6 points 1 year ago

And I demand that Louisiana Republicans get deleted, but we don't all get what we want, do we?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If these people aren't the most butthurt snowflakes ever over this podcaster, they sure are pretending to be.

JFC.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Any anti-Charlie Kirk post is a pro-humanity post.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago

FREEDOM! SMALL GOVERNMENT! ANTI CANCEL CULTURE! NOT SNOWFLAKES!

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How very free speech of them.

[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

Sounds very anti free speech

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 5 points 1 year ago

"I had the Constitution printed on custom toilet paper. Never has wiping felt so good!"

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Try that shit on the fediverse, chump.

He know he physically beats his children

so much free speech!

He can come to New Orleans if he wants to find out. All this bluster and can’t even take a street car 7 blocks or whatever.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Reddit is already way ahead of him.