this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
680 points (96.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

41945 readers
450 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 years ago
[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This post was reported for being a news article not a shower thought. Also it seems like several of the comments are concerned that it is political.

There isn't a rule against posting a link. The article does seem relevant and OP's thought isn't taken from the article, it seems unique, like something you might think of in the shower after reading the article.

There isn't a rule against political posts. Many posts have some component of politics to them.

Thank you all for being civil with each other. Thank you all for commenting and reporting when think something is pushing the limits on what should be considered a "shower thought", it's an abstract concept, so social pressure is helpful in shaping the community. I try to error on the side of being permissive.

As always, I am open to feedback.

Edit: spelling, ironically

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sir this is showerthoughts

[–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lol, think folks can't read time stamps, mate?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

What? I don't have any doubt you can read a timestamp.

[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He’s to politics what submarines are to aviation.

[–] SketchySeaBeast@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago

And, with any luck, when he finally implodes he'll take a few billionaires with him.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The misspellings are against spam filters

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Could be both, I've gotten emails where a word is spelled correctly some time, and then spolled wrong other times

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I see whot you did there.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

It’s to identify people that are an easy mark, and avoid people that are more observant.

[–] doleo@lemmy.one 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Would around 50% of Americans fall for an email scam?

[–] ech@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Truthfully? I'd bet an uncomfortable percentage of all people fall for common email scams all the time. But trumps base doesn't represent 50% of the country. More accurately, 33% of Americans fall for it, 33% push against it, and 33% don't think it's a big enough problem to mail in a form letter once every 4 years.

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I mean, if the ex president of the United States sent out the scam email, perhaps!

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

He does. Frequently.

"Buy commemorative coins, crypto, watches and Bibles to own the libs!"

I've seen my grandma's email.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Its actually around 20-25%% if you account for the popular vote (which was not close) and people who did not vote, despite being eligible.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago

Honestly, these stories are sad. Half the reports even end with them holding out some hope that their money is still in some fake account (because they have screenshots!), or that the person that conned them was not the perpetrator.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago

I’ve tried multiple times to respond to these scam emails, I honestly don’t know what you have to say to get scammed. I’m totally ready to quickly go buy a temporary credit card from target or whatever

That’s why I’m voting for Rachele Fruit!

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

those spam/scam emails[sic] with intentional misspellings

.... like 'emails'? Do your 'emails' have 'datas' in them?

[–] Steve@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

they're saying "email" is the plural of "email," and saying "emails" is like saying "datas" as the plural of "data," which is weird since "emails" is definitely valid.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

.... like 'emails'? Do your 'emails' have 'datas'[sic] in them?

You mean ‘datums’?