this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
23 points (92.6% liked)

memes

19392 readers
1270 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

As long as the communities are relevant.

Putting a star trek meme into ten forward then cross posing to memes is fine. Cross posting to chevron7 is not.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] NeedAdmin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

making sure thanks

[–] podperson@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

My hot take is that I don’t like cross posting or reposting. I subscribe to communities for the unique content and perspectives that each one provides and to see a user posting the same thing to five different communities for whatever reason (getting upvotes seems to be the only reason) seems silly to me. Let go of the ego a bit and this need for internet points.

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends on how you're doing it. It's common to be subscribed to multiple versions of any particular community and those cross posts will show up alongside each other in the feed.

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This might be an unpopular opinion, but that sounds exactly like spam to me.

I get the cross posting, rationale but I hate it (maybe I should just unsubscribe from the dupes?)

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What they need is an optional way for the client/server to collapse/merge similar links into one "post".

Yeah, that's the ideal, isn't it?

I can see how that's not a trivial thing to implement, however!

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I would agree in most cases