this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
205 points (98.6% liked)

News

35749 readers
2010 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] riskable@programming.dev 50 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

To summarize: Texas allows itself to be governed via right wing ideology and right wing ideology makes for piss poor disaster preparedness.

Expecting your government to do anything at all to protect people from disasters is literally the opposite of right wing ideology. Disaster preparedness—in the form of warning systems and building regulations—are implementations socialism (and environmentalism).

If you're a conservative (or libertarian), little girls dying in floods every few years is your ideal scenario. That's literally what you believe in! That it's not the government's job to prevent such things.

And let's be honest: If you're conservative you probably don't believe in global warming either so this is just an "act of God" that no one could've predicted (except science did predict this). Clearly, God is punishing those little girls (or their parents) for... Living in Texas?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 7 months ago

isnt texas also reliant federal dollars via having tons of US military bases there.

[–] Jolly_Platypus@lemmy.world 43 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Because Texans aren't very bright?

[–] voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 7 months ago

There are a lot of very bright texans, they're just concentrated heavily in urban areas, gerrymandered to hell and our opposition party is even dumber than the national democrats. Not that there aren't frustratingly a lot of really dumb texans.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They put self-reliance above everything else, while also not being all that self-reliant. So yeah, morons.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] mxcory@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago

They earned that one star sticker in school and are so proud of it.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

Article can be summarized thusly: They're morons.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They're stupid and corrupt.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago

Uneduct and corrupt. It's not that they're genetically predisposed to have a lower intelligence, it's that their government actively works on keeping the majority of the population dumb as dumb people are easier to control and manipulate and lie to

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I mean they don't believe at all in federal government unless you're talking about ice raids or police. Then they also don't really believe in state government unless you're talking about bending over and spreading wide for industrial waste generating junk corporations. Then much of the state is unincorporated praire so you're not getting a local government that takes great care of the tumbleweeds. It's basically anarcho capitalism in Texas which is exactly why it sucks so much.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I mean they don't believe at all in federal government unless you're talking about ice raids or police.

That's not true at all! How can you just ignore that they'll happily come to the fed and take all kinds of money (whether or not they use it for the intended purpose, or ignore disaster preparedness to spend the money on militarizing the cops)

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Everything’s bigger in Texas.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago

The bigots,the morons, the assholes...

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Texas can spend all the money in the world on disaster preparedness, but it won't matter if Camp Staff has their cell phones and weather radios switched off.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You couldn't even be bothered to read the article could you?

Here's a fun fact for you. Outdoor sirens can be heard by people, regardless of the status of their electronic devices.

As the article states. Texas seems very willing to spend enormous sums of money on disaster recovery, but very little on prevention, as the mentioned siren system was shut down in the Texas Senate for the reason of "too expensive"

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The siren system was shut down because the technology was unreliable and giving out way too many false alarms -- to the point where the residents were just ignoring it. It is a difficult problem because you need to give enough possible advance warning to evacuate, but not so much that they start tuning it out altogether. Even modern first-world countries struggle with this.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

https://www.texastribune.org/2025/07/06/texas-disaster-warning-emergency-communication-bill-kerrville-floods/

The measure, House Bill 13, would have created a new government council to establish the emergency response plan and administer the grant program, both of which would have been aimed at facilitating better communication between first responders. The bill also called for the plan to include “the use of outdoor warning sirens,” like those used in tornado-prone Texas counties, and develop new “emergency alert systems.”

The technology isn't unreliable. It's a question of implementation. It's a question about money and how much you want to spend refining and improving the software controlling it and surrounding sensors.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

if they wernt they wouldn't have energy sector completely controlled by an oligarchy, texas most resemble russia out of all the states.