this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
127 points (100.0% liked)

News

37771 readers
2249 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago (2 children)

“Well boys, looks like shoe bombs are back on the menu!”

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Airports in Europe do not make most passengers remove shoes, but nobody has blown up a plane there with a shoe bomb. It's probably not a serious threat.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah it's not like the shoes aren't getting scanned either. They still go with the person through a scanner

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It was never about bombs. It’s so they can catch you with a gram of weed.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

If I wanted to hypothetically perform a terrorist attack I’d bring an explosive device into a TSA security checkpoint line on a busy travel day.

Hypothetically.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Everyone should have realized it was security theater when nobody was asked to remove their underwear after the underwear bomber.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umar_Farouk_Abdulmutallab

Next up is to ditch the fluid restrictions.

"I'm sorry, that's too much fluid, here, let me dispose of it right next to this massive line of people in case it has an explosive, chemical, or biological component..."

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago
[–] TheWeirdestCunt@lemmy.today 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In Europe fluid restrictions have been lifted afaik. There's new scanners where liquids don't have to separated and you don't need to take electronics out of your suitcase. I haven't been on a plane since they came in but my girlfriend said that the time to get through security dropped from a couple hours to about half an hour last time she flew.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 4 points 10 months ago

No. It's complicated. There are new scanners, which are supposed to detect and identify fluids, and we're supposed to lead to a removal of the fluid restrictions. But now there's claims they are not good as expected.

So yeah, new scanners, but sometimes with restrictions in place and sometimes not. And if the whole airport (or just the security check point you end up at) doesn't have the new scanner... then of course the restriction is definitely in place.

Source: airport nearby has a mix of old and new scanners.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Richard Reid is serving three consecutive life sentences, plus 110 years on top, for the original shoe bombing plot. The shoes contained 10 ounces of C4. He resides at ADX Florence.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 3 points 10 months ago

Shoes on, but pants off!