this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
163 points (99.4% liked)

Just Post

973 readers
261 users here now

Just post something πŸ’›

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 29 points 7 hours ago

All this is implying is that they are capturing this data anyways and offering you a peek at it for money with the guise that its for your safety.

There is likely no way for you to shut it off tracking you everywhere in your own home unless you pay them to access the settings for this feature.

They likely can track you behaviors with this and know when you take a shit, when you jerk-off/fuck your spouse, when you watch media, etc using machine-learning on the wifi specrum of your locations, signal shape, and duration.

Fuck this crazy invasive shit to piss.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 58 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Awesome tech, if (and only if) you control it end to end, with no corporation involved in that process.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's why you buy your own router.

I'm using chromecast for streaming to my television. But I accidentally cut my internetcord and guess what doesn't work without internet eventhough it doesn't strictly need internet? Exactly, I'm getting rid of the chromecast soon.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 hours ago

When streaming content to a chromecast it usually makes a direct connection to the content source, not going through the device you're casting from. In limited cases like when sharing your screen to the chromecast it does only go from your device to the chromecast without internet, but that's rarely used because it's power and data intensive to your device. I guess you're right on the internet not being 'strictly' needed but it's used for a reason.

Should still buy your own router though, and move away from google services πŸ‘

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 40 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

With only one payment you can allow us to invade your privacy... Even more than we already do.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure it’s, β€œwith one more monthly payment, we will give you some insight into a small price of information we already know β€œ

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 6 hours ago

yeah im like. oh they are collecting it but if you pay they will give you a copy.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago

Reminds me of The Dark Knight when Batman activates something similar using cell signals.

We really ought to stop fucking creating the Torment Nexus, jfc.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So I guess those directional MIMO arrays can now give information back to the host controller. That is kinda creepy but also it could be super useful in the right circumstances.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Device-free passive localization has been around for over 15 years.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/0908.0893

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So when's it gonna be in Home Assistant?

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The idea of DfP has been around for over 15 years but its only recently become possible outside of a laboratory environment. It isn't in HA yet because no one has bothered to write a module for it and there's almost no WiFi gear that supports it; either natively or through exposing the data necessary to make it work.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Hmm, maybe they need to build it into OpenWRT first, then.

Either way, the bottom line is that it's completely unacceptable to exist as a feature unless it's 100% Free Software and running 100% locally.