this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
486 points (99.4% liked)

politics

24592 readers
2656 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Photographer Job Garcia, a US citizen, seeks recompense after reportedly being tackled and thrown to the ground

A US citizen is seeking $1m in recompense from Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agencies after being arrested by officials last month when filming an immigration raid at a Home Depot store.

Job Garcia, a 37-year-old a photographer and PhD student at Claremont Graduate University, was tackled, thrown to the ground, arrested and detained for over 24 hours, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (Maldef) said. The advocacy group is representing Garcia.

The arrest of immigrants has escalated nationwide, notably at Home Depot sites, where undocumented laborers in particular gather in parking lots outside branches of the store chain, waiting to be picked up for casual work.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Karrion409@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Should be a slam dunk lawsuit, right? It's not illegal to film, only to be brown.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 27 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Hope he wins and it could pay off his tuition.

I don't know about the million dollars but the right to film in public and to film public officials while they are doing their jobs is covered by the first amendment's freedom of the press. It's gone to SCOTUS multiple times and been upheld and strengthened each time. Not saying that there's no way this particular SCOTUS would overturn those rulings but it would be a huge deal and seriously negatively affect not individuals but a bunch of major corporations so that at least would probably give them some pause.

Good, there shoukd be huge penalties for fucking with journalism

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 33 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like we should know who these ice agents are and have constant protests outside their homes. They shouldn't be able to sleep soundly at night

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago

Nah they deserve the most sound sleep, the type that comes with a bottle through the window and a claymore in front of the door.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 67 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I hope he's well protected because I doubt they would hesitate to send him to Venezuela (by mistake of course!)

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

They'll engage in intimidation tactics

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

They got a nice new budget i hope he gets a super fat chunk of it.

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I guess another option is to use drones to record ICE terrorist activities.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Drone are trackable btw. They used to have DJI Aeroscope, they don't officially sell it now, but they could still sell it in secret.

One or two people doing it is fine, but if it become a trend, they will implement a no-drone zone via executive order (which is probably legal btw), then jam them or shoot at it. And they then have a legal pretense (not that they need a legal pretense anyways) to triangulate the signals and find you and throw you in a concentration camp.

I'm thinking more of a binocular attached to camera and record from far away type of thing. Very discreet, no propeller noises. All you need is a clear line of sight.

[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

Non-DJI still emit radiowaves.

[–] RazgrizOne@piefed.zip 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

drones are trackable

Not if you have a phantom II from back when they had a GPS toggle on the controller ;)

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Still trackable.

Radiowaves, my friend.

Ham radios don't have GPS and those amateurs will hunt you down if you mess with them.

The authorities can definitely pinpoint signals.

I mean unless you start using those tiny fiber optic cables to control it like they do in ukraine, then they could still shoot at it then find out who bought the drone.

So you basically have to do a lot of DIY with fiber optic cables, and also anonymously buy a drone from somewhere in cash.

I still think its best to use digiscoping, since, are you gonna carry a drone everywhere?

How quick can you get the bird flying before the incident is already over and they leave?

And it forces you to be on ground level, since its very difficult to take off from insidee a building and out a tiny gap in the window (I've tried it before, I crash on the window frame lol). When a protest is happening, you as a citizen-journalist wanna get as far away as possible, so that you can preserve the footage and therefore use it to sway public opinion. Find a good vantage point in a building somewhere with line-of-sight to a protest, set up cameras with scopes, and record from far away.

At least, that's my opinion. You can go Ukranian FPV with fiber cabled if you are that skilled in DIY and flying drones, be my guest 😅

[–] RazgrizOne@piefed.zip 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Ha you know your stuff. That being said, radio pinpointing takes time and I am actually very good at flying through small gaps - I was an early drone op, hence the phantom II I keep around!

You keep it stripped down in a backpack so it’s easy to move without worrying about security cam footage and you launch from tall buildings. If you’re smart you get a colleague to bring it in days prior and stash it. Biggest risk is someone catching you in the act of launching, which admittedly is very difficult to avoid 100% of the time. Not that I’d know, to be clear. It’s not like I’d fly drones near the capitol during major protests, that’d be really risky and illegal. Don’t do that ever.

[–] atticus88th@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Damn I need to take some time off work and just have my phone out recording an ICE raid, then I'll be well on my way to not having to work... for 4 years.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

You spend $250,000 a year?