this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
478 points (98.8% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7203 readers
885 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The family of a Canadian national who supported Donald Trump’s plans for mass deportations of immigrants say they are feeling betrayed after federal agents recently detained the woman in California while she interviewed for permanent US residency – and began working to expel her from the country.

“We feel totally blindsided,” Cynthia Olivera’s husband – US citizen and self-identified Trump voter Francisco Olivera – told the California news station KGTV. “I want my vote back.”

Cynthia Olivera, a 45-year-old mother of three US-born children, thus joined a growing list of examples contradicting the Trump administration’s claims that the immigration crackdown it has spearheaded since the president’s return to the Oval Office in January has prioritized targeting dangerous criminals.

Well, Canadian, obviously a commie with the healthcare etc

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 2 points 1 hour ago

I guess shes going back to... squints at screen Cambodia.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Don't worry, by 2028 they'll be all-in on whoever the fascist ghoul is without a lick of self-reflection. Even if it's Trump again.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

First one of these I've seen where they actually regret it when their family gets dragged away.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 20 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

supported Donald Trump’s plans for mass deportations of immigrants

Just to be clear, they didn't just support trump for "better economic policies" or "safety" or "freedom from the 'radical left'", but specifically supporting the mass deportations?

🤣

Edit:

In 2024, toward the end of his presidency, Joe Biden’s administration granted her a permit allowing her to work legally in the US. She had also been navigating the process to obtain legal permanent US residency – colloquially referred to as a green card – for years.

Nonetheless, instead of supporting the candidate Biden endorsed to succeed him, then vice-president Kamala Harris, Olivera’s husband supported Trump in November’s White House election. He told KGTV that Trump’s promises to deport criminals en masse – despite his own May 2024 conviction of felony falsification of business records – appealed to both Francisco and Cynthia. And, echoing other mixed immigration status families who have had members affected by Trump’s policies, the Oliveras did not believe she would be hurt by her lack of legal US residency.

Plot hole, bad writing. Did D&D write this shit?

Seriously, when I arrived in the US, the moment I was old enough to learn about politics, I was immediately supportative to the Democrats, not because I like them per se, but its out of self-perservation. Didn't even think too hard about it. Doesn't really take too much brain cells to know that supporting the party that's more anti-immigrant, while yourself is an immigrant is a very stupid idea. I can't believe these people exist. I feel like I'm in a simulation and this is just the creators of this reality trolling me.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 8 hours ago
[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

I hope she gets deported.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

LOL! They're a bunch of racist neo-Nazi fucks. If the Cynthia tries to get Francisco to Canada, Canadian Immigration should deny them.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

No takebacksies. No mercy. Get fucked.

[–] Xande@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Muhahahahahahaha...

FAFO!

No mercy...

Racist white people dont consider themselves immigrants, they use ex pat because they themselves use immigrant in a derogatory way

[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 28 points 16 hours ago

Fuck these people.

They should have listened to what all of us were telling them constantly.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 29 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

In 2024, toward the end of his presidency, Joe Biden’s administration granted her a permit allowing her to work legally in the US

But voted Trump and probably blames Biden for this

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The hatred towards non whites really resonated with her. They were supposed to go after them not people like her.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Funny thing is the husband is Hispanic.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 73 points 20 hours ago
[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 18 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Votes should be revokable, I've always liked the idea of liquid democracy.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I have an issue with this.

An abuseive family member could coerce you to delegate your vote to them.

With secret ballots you can't find out how someone voted.

But with this "delegation", even if you have secret ballots, they'll say "If I don't get X number of delegated votes, something bad happens". They don't need to know who you delegated to, they just need to know that the number of delegated votes they themselves receives in a tally is equal to the number of people there is in the household.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 hours ago

Hmm, you're right, that is definitely a problem. The best solutions I can think of would be-

  1. Voter coercion laws. If nothing else make it at least illegal to do exactly that, so abusers can be held accountable.

  2. Maybe limit who can receive delegations in some way. Like making the status of being a delegate carry responsibilities, requiring a small curriculum and civil service so that only people who genuinely care about being representatives pursue that path rather than any average asshole who might coerce their peers and family into giving them more personal voting power.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That's a step in the right direction, but ultimately, the best solution would be an imperative mandate. I have no idea how we've let ourselves get gaslit that free mandates (once someone is elected they can do what they want, regardless of voter intention) is somehow more democratic than imperative mandates.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Arguably, Trump IS following an imperative mandate. This is what his voters want. This is what he promised them

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Haven't seen this posted in a while. I forgot you can delegate your vote to different people for different issues. How is the "category" of an issue decided though?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that be up to the delagator? Wouldn't they just decide case by case?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Then the delegator has to vote/delegate on every issue-- they don't need expertise themselves like in a direct democracy, but it is still an issue due to sheer vote volume.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah pretty much. You trust your guy until you change your mind or feel that you need to change your vote. Not really seeing a problem with that.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I don't think you're understanding my point. If, as you said, you have to assign a delegate "case by case" for every vote, then you have to vote in every vote. This comes with all the problems of getting people to vote on things now, but 100x as bad because of how many votes there would be.

[–] redsunrise@programming.dev 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I love this idea, but the main obstacle this has to overcome is the voter's knowledge of the issues and any given candidate stances on them. If we implemented this in the US, I feel like most people would still simply delegate all their votes to one candidate or all candidates of a particular party. It's a lot of information for a working person to keep track of. Any idea on how to overcome this with paper ballots? Or are computerized ballots with all relevant information embedded within the way to go?

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago

Even if most people just delegate their votes in an uninformed way, a liquid democracy would be more resilient to issues coming from that because people can change their votes after casting them.

I'm not sure what kinds of solutions other people have come up with, but personally what I think could be practical is an institution either like a bank, or possibly even incorporated into banks. They already have mature infrastructure for the secure handling of financial data and systems against fraud.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 78 points 21 hours ago

imagine being a grown ass adult and being surprised by this

imagine also thinking you're entitled to sympathy from anyone after voting for literally this

those people can go fuck themselves. i'm glad they're suffering

[–] BrambinagStoneboots@lemmy.world 134 points 23 hours ago
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 95 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] errer@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Good memes in this thread that I’m saving for future use y’all, keep em coming.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

dumb fucks.

what did they actually think would happen? the shit he said he was going to do was going to be directed at everyone but them because they were "special"?

[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Yes, because they are special... Only brown, dirty, poor people would get kicked out or dissapeared. They are ok with that. They have money so evidently it would not affect them.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 70 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

surprised MAGAchu noises

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago

"wont deport me, I'm white"

[–] unabart@sh.itjust.works 6 points 15 hours ago

And the leopards shall feast upon the carrion!

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 25 points 20 hours ago

Opa leopard style!

[–] sleepmode@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

“It’s a big club! And you ain’t in it.”

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

The mental gymnastics these people engage in to completely ignore how fascists work is mind numbing.

[–] venoft@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

But but but, we're not brown!

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Blindsided lol.

[–] goombakid@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Not one to be super religious, but I think Galatians 6:7 fits well here.

"Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows."

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 10 points 18 hours ago
[–] ThePiedPooper@discuss.online 19 points 21 hours ago

Tater tots and prayers.

[–] renamon_silver@lemmy.wtf 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

A stunning turn of events for sure.

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 3 points 16 hours ago

Nobody could have predicted this.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Votes for harsh immigration laws.

Sees Canadian getting fucked by immigration laws.

"Wait! I meant brown people! Immigration laws against Brown people! Trump betrayed us!"

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Sorry, no Second Brexit.