this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
350 points (94.6% liked)

politics

24584 readers
2740 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Welp...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

How many weeks before he gets bored and abandons it when things don’t immediately work, just like everything else in his useless life?

[–] match@pawb.social 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

unlike rockets or cars, political party success in America is measured in dollars

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 35 minutes ago

He already bought himself an entire department with no oversight but got bored of it after a few months.

[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

A white South African dude created the American Party

ffs did somebody step on a bug in 2015 and change the whole timeline?

[–] match@pawb.social 4 points 59 minutes ago

I'm thinking of doing a Ghost Dance to bring Harambe back

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 16 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I fail to see how splitting up the fascists is anything but a good thing. Let them fight.

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 1 points 56 minutes ago

True that. Although in a would be tri-party system, so in case this new party gains somewhat reasonable backing, it gains significant bargaining power over the much bigger parties because it would likely hold keys to majority vote. So it might just become much greater than its apparent size… But yeah, I doubt much anything comes out of this.

[–] markstos@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I’m sure Tesla shareholders are happy to hear he’s picked up another side project.

[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Don’t you remember? He’s a super genius!

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago

Get ready for some more 12D chess from Mr. Rocket Scientist AI Expert

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 5 points 2 hours ago

Odd strategy.

Leftists won't buy it, and most liberals aren't going to buy it, and it might divide the right, while team blue is fracturing.

Gonna be a 4 on one, not a 3.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago) (2 children)

Reading the article to see what ridiculous name he's going to give it.

"The America Party"?

TBH, pretty tame in Musk standards. At least it's pronounceable.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

The name is to make a grab at the r’s. If it wasn’t, he would have named it the x party.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm surprised he didn't go with a stupid acronym

TAP is a stupid acronym.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 23 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I hope this would split the vote among magas and republicans and the dems would be a shoe in. Sadly, I've lost a lot of faith in the dems and their ability to effectively fight for the people. Maybe we need even more parties?

A third party is only likely to split the vote of the people who can't stand trump.

[–] markstos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

One obstacle all third parties face in the US is party-line voting, which favors the dominant parties.

On possible outcome is that he puts a lot of money into making third party candidates more viable, like efforts to ban party-line voting or supporting ranked choice voting. So, you could vote for the America Party candidate and then if they don’t have a majority ñ, you vote could roll over to the Dem or GOP candidate of your choice, reducing your risk of voting third party.

These changes would help Libertarian, Green and other parties as well. More choice for voters!

[–] jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk 15 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, can "aliens" start political parties in the USA?

Imma start a "British Colony" party over there; anyone want to join me? MAABCA.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 7 points 8 hours ago

He doesn't have to run himself. He can endorse and fund people to run for him

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago

Political parties are independent entities, not part of the government, so yes anyone can make one.

[–] Alenalda@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Cool so a third liberal party

[–] lando55@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

I'm all for it. If Brewster's Millions taught me anything it's that involving yourself in US politics is the quickest way to lose vast sums of money.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

The entire Democrat demographic hates him for kissing Trumps ass.

The entire Trump demogaphic hates him for going against Trump.

And the Republican demographic have never liked him as far as I'm aware.

So.... who are his voters? Probably just a convenient way to shuffle money around.

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 52 minutes ago

Voters? The goal here is to separate Musk from as many dollars as possible

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 7 hours ago

He's completely unable to read the room. Understandable really, he doesn't exist in the same world as the rest of us really.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 hours ago

This isn’t about money. It’s about Elon Musk‘s ego and will to power.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 35 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

are they hiring? i have many expensive ideas with zero guarantees of success

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe that's the only way US will ever get a third party. I'm not an American but I do think american politics system would be significantly stronger even with a minority 3rd party. Can you imagine how powerful US would be with a diverse parlament that has true competition of ideas not just partisan voting? That's true "checks and balances".

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

The problem is the US isn't setup for third parties to really work, all this is going to do is most likely be a spoiler vote from Republicans and give more wins to Democrats. Maybe if they're lucky they'll win a few seats in uncompetitive districts.

[–] Ruxias@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

We don't need more false choice though. This would be a another bourgeois party. The cards might be shuffled a bit and the rhetoric might change but it'd still be playing the same game with the same cards. It's still a game of "choose your favorite faction of rich people" despite the tweaks in messaging. There will still be an assurance of "nothing will fundamentally change" to the owners and donors.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The American Billionaires Party?

If they manage to steal half the GOPs votes, we have reason to thank him.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not opposed to his.

A party composed of billionaires.

That will help in a situation where we have to do a French revolution.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Sadly, such a party would not be big enough to tear into the GOP.

load more comments
view more: next ›