this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
521 points (98.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

40757 readers
1962 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A special "go fuck yourself" to Virginia Foxx and Mike Johnson.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 minutes ago

I hope someday to see a hero get caught with this photo but there are red x's over the ones he's already taken out.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 13 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I wonder what the combined financial net worth of this photo is because the calculation for the combined human value shown in this photo is easy

That is zero

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

Human value is worthless, when you rolling like these biG DoGs.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Every single one of these people is a human rights violator and should be tried for such, along with being some of the most corrupt, hateful people in history.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 39 minutes ago

We need a government willing to hold them accountable.

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 10 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (3 children)

As an Australian I am constantly amazed that no matter how racist, homophobic, greedy, stupid, selfish and blatantly self-serving America’s government representatives are, you continue to vote for them.

We arent so committed to the red vs blue ideology. If I vote for blue one term and they don’t perform I’ll vote red or green or independent next term.

Unfortunately, the way things are going, your vote might not make a difference for much longer.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Doesn't the coal industry control your government? And remind me where Rupert Murdoch came from.

If I vote for blue one term and they don’t perform I’ll vote red or green or independent next term.

uh, I'm pretty sure that's a factor to how America got to the way it is.

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

To be clear, Australia is not perfect by a long stretch, but our politicians are much more discrete in their desire for enrichment, we also have a lot more guard rails in place to prevent it, while they are in office.

While there is obviously big business trying to influence government decisions, that will always happen regardless of who we vote in. My point is, if the person you vote for isn’t clearly concerned with improving the lives of their constituents you should absolutely fuck them off and not continually vote for them for decades.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago

I’ve seen sky news clips from Australia, y’all are on your way soon enough to look like America, unfortunately

[–] witten@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Look up "gerrymandering" and then come back.

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 4 points 1 hour ago

Interesting, learnt something new. Thanks.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

Sad part is.? I can't even make a dark job more depressing than that statement.

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

get names and start to hold them to account; find ways to get them voted out

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 38 minutes ago

And held accountable. We keep voting them out and no one is charged for their crimes.

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The woman in the red dress, isn’t she the Alaskan senator that voted yes then told everyone else to vote no?

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 hour ago

No, that cunt is not in the House picture. Maybe she is feasting in the shadows.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 2 hours ago

Ghouls, all of them.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 15 points 3 hours ago

Looks like a target rich environment to me.

[–] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They should post this picture at every rural hospital they close.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

And send it to everyone diagnosed with a life-threatening illness that won't be able to pay for treatment.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm sure they already know who they are. Republicans have tried to kill those that depend on social safety nets for decades.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There is an awful lot of white in this picture.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

See if you can spot the one black guy. Like where's waldo but uncle tom version.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 4 hours ago

Oh wow. All the way on the left. Head barely on the photo. Only saw him because of his hand

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

The killer collective.

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Can anyone specifically point out which pieces on the bill will remove healthcare from Medicaid. I was reading through and haven’t found those parts yet. I was focusing on the rescinding for green energy tax credits.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

it will be easier to make people ineligible, states will have less funding and thus less reason to enroll people, and also in a general sense the overall government budget is being forced to cut a trillion dollars which will only happen if they stop funding healthcare https://govfacts.org/explainer/how-the-one-big-beautiful-bill-targets-medicare-and-medicaid/

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

80 hours a month!?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

If you want to read it yourself, there’s an entire section. Table of contents ….

—-

Subtitle B--Health

                      Chapter 1--Medicaid

subchapter a--reducing fraud and improving enrollment processes

Sec. 71101. Moratorium on implementation of rule relating to eligibility and enrollment in Medicare Savings Programs. Sec. 71102. Moratorium on implementation of rule relating to eligibility and enrollment for Medicaid, CHIP, and the Basic Health Program. Sec. 71103. Reducing duplicate enrollment under the Medicaid and CHIP programs. Sec. 71104. Ensuring deceased individuals do not remain enrolled. Sec. 71105. Ensuring deceased providers do not remain enrolled. Sec. 71106. Payment reduction related to certain erroneous excess payments under Medicaid. Sec. 71107. Eligibility redeterminations. Sec. 71108. Revising home equity limit for determining eligibility for long-term care services under the Medicaid program. Sec. 71109. Alien Medicaid eligibility. Sec. 71110. Expansion FMAP for emergency Medicaid.

           subchapter b--preventing wasteful spending

Sec. 71111. Moratorium on implementation of rule relating to staffing standards for long-term care facilities under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Sec. 71112. Reducing State Medicaid costs. Sec. 71113. Federal payments to prohibited entities.

       subchapter c--stopping abusive financing practices

Sec. 71114. Sunsetting increased FMAP incentive. Sec. 71115. Provider taxes. Sec. 71116. State directed payments. Sec. 71117. Requirements regarding waiver of uniform tax requirement for Medicaid provider tax. Sec. 71118. Requiring budget neutrality for Medicaid demonstration projects under section 1115.

        subchapter d--increasing personal accountability

Sec. 71119. Requirement for States to establish Medicaid community engagement requirements for certain individuals. Sec. 71120. Modifying cost sharing requirements for certain expansion individuals under the Medicaid program.

             subchapter e--expanding access to care

Sec. 71121. Making certain adjustments to coverage of home or community-based services under Medicaid.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 hours ago

Work requirements. Other states have done this before. They all canned it because they found out, work requirements don't increase work. It decrease the use of those that qualify. It increases paperwork which can be rejected by errors.

You also have the SSDI part. Most people that are disabled don't qualify for SSDI.

I personally know someone that had double kidney failure. This is from a direct issue the U.S. government caused acknowledged. However, they don't what to make it easy and hope the people just die. Which is a very strong possibility. They DO NOT qualify for SSDI.

Next time they get sick, they will die. Point Blank.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 46 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There is nothing mild about this.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 hours ago

It's a bunch of murderous ghouls celebrating the death of poor people.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 108 points 8 hours ago (14 children)

I can't think of a place more deserving of a mass-shooting than this room.

[–] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 21 points 5 hours ago

There are approximately 146,000 people named Mario in the US alone. Any one of them could do the FUNNIEST THING.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 52 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Ya know....it's not often you root for the public shooter.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 32 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The times we live in.

I want off this ride.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 35 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The majority of these people should be in retirement homes. Bad ones.

[–] regedit@feddit.online 1 points 4 minutes ago

Lucky for the them, that's all we have now that the billionaires have bought them all up and carved them out to husks with shambling corpses that used to be loved ones!

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

The majority of these people should be a few meters under IMO.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 119 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And they are probably aware of that. The suffering is the point.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

That’s what happens when you put people in leadership positions who earnestly believe that empathy is a ‘fundamental weakness’. Ya know, ignoring that empathy is precisely what’s made us successful as a species in the first place.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

It would be a great service to this nation if a plane had crashed into that spot.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] slingstone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Joe Wilson from South Carolina can kiss my butt, too.

load more comments
view more: next ›