this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
354 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

72362 readers
2755 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Schools and lawmakers are grappling with how to address a new form of peer-on-peer image-based sexual abuse that disproportionately targets girls.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] argl@feddit.org 3 points 15 hours ago

Can't afford this much cheese today to find just the right slice for every bikini photo...

[–] vane@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe let's assume all digital images are fake and go back to painting. Wait... what if children start painting deepfakes ?

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Or pasting someone's photo over porn...in their minds...

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

probably because there's a rapist in the white house.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To add to that. I live in a red area and since the election I’ve been cat called much more. And it’s weird too, cus I’m middle aged…. I thought I’d finally disappear…

the toxic manosphere/blogosphere/whatever it's called has done so much lifelong damage

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Deepfakes might end up being the modern version of a bikini. In the olden days, people wore these to the beach. Having less was scandalous and moral decay. Yet, now we wear much less.

Our grandchildren might simply not give a damn about their nudity, because it is assumed that everyone is deepfaking everyone.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

These are all worn voluntarily. This issue isn’t about the equivalent of scandalously clad young girls, it’s like if girls were being involuntarily stripped of their clothing by their classmates. It’s not about modesty standards it’s about sexual abuse.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago

It can be both. The cornerstone of why nudity can be abused, is that society makes it shameful to be bare. If some generations from now that people can just shrug and not care, that is one less tool an abuser can use against people.

In any case, I am of the mind that people of my generation might be doing their own version of the Satanic Panic, or the reaction against rap music. For better or worse, older people cannot relate to the younger.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 0 points 8 hours ago

Unless it is used to pretend that it is a real video and circulated for denigration or blackmail, it is very much not at all like assault. And also, deepfakes do not have the special features hidden under your clothes, so it is possible to debunk those if you really have to.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

God I'm glad I'm not a kid now. I never would have survived.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 65 points 1 day ago (13 children)

For example, Louisiana mandates a minimum five-year jail sentence no matter the age of the perpetrator.

That's just on it's face stupid. A thirteen year old boy is absolutely gonna wanna see girls in his age group naked. That's not pedophilia. It's wanting to see the girls he fantasizes about at school every day. Source: I was a thirteen year old boy.

It shouldn't be treated the same as when an adult man generates it; there should be nuance. I'm not saying it's ok for a thirteen year old to generate said content: I'm saying tailor the punishment to fit the reality of the differences in motivations. Leave it to Louisiana to once again use a cudgel rather than sense.

I'm so glad I went through puberty at a time when this kind of shit wasn't available. The thirteen year old version of me would absolutely have got myself in a lot of trouble. And depending on what state I was in, seventeen year old me could have ended listed as a sex predetor for sending dick pics to my gf cause I produced child pornography. God, some states have stupid laws.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In general, even up here in woke-ville, punishments have gotten a lot more strict for kids. There’s a lot more involvement of police, courts, jail. As a parent it causes me a lot of anxiety - whatever happened to school being a “sandbox” where a kid can make mistakes without adult consequences, without ruining their lives? Did that ever exist?

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I can already picture that as an Onion headline:

New York Renames State to 'WokeVille'. NYC to follow.

[–] jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

it existed if society liked you enough.

fascists just have a habit of tightening that belt smaller and smaller, is what’s going on.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social -2 points 15 hours ago

Burkas for the win ?

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 138 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Lawmakers are grappling with how to address ...

Just a reminder that the government is actively voting against regulations on AI, because obviously a lot of these people are pocketing lobbyist money

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Welp, if I had kids they would have one of those scramble suits like in a scanner darkly.

It would of course be their choice to wear them but Id definitely look for ways to limit their time in areas with cameras present.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's just called the outside now. Assume you are on camera at all times the moment you step out the front door. To be safe in the surveillance we live in today, best act as though you are being recorded in your own home as well.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

best act as though you are being recorded in your own home as well.

If you don't know, don't try? Seems a bit defeatist.

There's also the matter of "you" the NPC and well... "You".

You can rest easy knowing Trump knows you're at work, but not the contents of the monologue you gave on Palestine on a political XMPP chatroom.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You can make areas safe from cameras. No, you cant make everywhere camera free but you can minimize your time in those areas. Im not saying its a good system it would just be adjusting to the times.

If the floor was lava and all that...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›