this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
329 points (99.7% liked)

News

36270 readers
2772 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

June 24 (Reuters) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention posted a report on Tuesday that said evidence does not support a link between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism or other neurodevelopmental disorders, ahead of a two-day meeting of an advisory panel later this week.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GoobyMcMooby@lemmy.zip 50 points 8 months ago (3 children)

That’s all well and good, but the people leading these organizations believe that science = jumping to a vibes based conclusion and then smashing a bunch of shit together calling it a process. It doesn’t matter if the sources are just made up or simply not there. Actual data driven results are for egghead gay communists who think chem trails are fake.

[–] MPD@kbin.earth 22 points 8 months ago

I wonder if this is a last ditch effort to get info out before it all get rolled back pseudoscience becomes gospel.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Hey, what time is Dr. Phil on? /s

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Not just the people leading these organizations, this seems to have become what the average American thinks science is, and it is literally killing our society.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just wait until that son-of-a-bridge RFK Jr. gets to it. I hear he has a fresh shipment of Sharpies from the White House to make sure it is totally accurate.

He will start by editing out the "not" in the above quote. See? Science works!

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 months ago

That's what we call peer review.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 20 points 8 months ago

But what does a panel of con artists, quacks, cranks and influencers say?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Breaking News from RFK Jr: 100% of people who have Autism and have this shot, had this shot! It was the shot!

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago

Way too coherent and clear. You forgot the proceeding "Uh wuh wuh buh bup wah we well..."

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 18 points 8 months ago

Definitely surprised that the incompetent administration allowed this.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

US CDC report shows ~~no~~ link between ~~thimerosal-containing~~ vaccines and autism

~RFK Jr

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Tomorrow:

Oops typo
-RFK Jr

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

"They're all fired anyway"

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 8 months ago

That's just going to make the nutjobs believe it more...

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 8 months ago
[–] NeonNight@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

Too many people can’t grasp that autism symptoms show up around the age these vaccines are given, and that it often causes your child to regress to a degree. But no, they don’t want to accept a complicated answer that doesn’t let them blame somebody.

[–] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think this headline belongs to this article.

The article is talking about how the study referenced a non-existent source

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

If the evidence doesn't support your cause: lie

[–] arin@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago
[–] besselj@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'm inclined to believe it, but the CDC has very little credibility right now

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

It had quite a bit up to about 5 months ago.

[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Thats the great thing about science, you don't have to 'believe' it.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

Unless you're a trained scientist qualified to review their studies, you have to believe someone.

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Indeed, but if just one person is caught fudging numbers to get desired results, all of their work gets called into question. Without transparency, all you can go on is credibility and "believing".

[–] woobat@midwest.social 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thats..not how science works.

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It isn't, but not all scientists can maintain scientific integrity when faced with significant external pressures (from people like RFK, for example). Those that can't dont stay scientists for long.

All findings can eventually be reproduced or disproven, but not without time and money. In the short term, trust and credibility is paramount.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You do know that peer review exists, right? This isn't some brand new hypothesis being tested for the first time.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

I'm sure the memes you see on TikTok are much more credible and fact-based.