this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
120 points (88.5% liked)

Technology

71503 readers
3564 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

How complicated is a federated messenger? Because it feels like matrix is the only one but there's always an issue

[–] eronth@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

It feels like there could/should be a good modern chat protocol and voice protocol and you just pick which interface you want to use, much like email currently does, except for chatrooms.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 25 minutes ago

There is: XMPP 🤷

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Add voice to IRC. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

no mention of tox chat, eh? Open source, p2p private chat, what's not to like?

[–] Lazycog@sopuli.xyz 43 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

SimpleX Chat – Many suggested this and I will explicitly recommend against it due to the founder's positions on various topics. This includes being anti-vaxx, believing COVID-19 was a hoax, trans- and homophobia, climate denial; In the SimpleX Groupchat he's also been seen basically bootlicking trump a couple times, but I've lost receipts to that.

I did not know this. I've seen people recommend SimpleX on lemmy too, but probably they didn't know.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

This should be an awareness post on some tech communities

[–] penguin202124@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago

Thank you so, so, so, so much for saying this!

[–] astute@sh.itjust.works 13 points 9 hours ago

Me neither, this is actually disgusting, immediately uninstalled, a founder that has these views most likely shouldn’t be trusted with your data, anyway.

[–] Ofiuco@piefed.ca 3 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

Fuck... Is there an alternative? Can't use telegram cus banned, won't use signal because usa and for a while they got very buddy-buddy with the zucc, matrix requires me hosting and it isn't exactly private... So what's left?

[–] penguin202124@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

XMPP? The clients not supporting things can suck, but it's worked well for me.

[–] unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

It is forkable if necessary. I do think SimpleX is a great piece of software that shouldn't be reinvented because of the founder.

[–] Lazycog@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago

The write-up I'm referencing has some at the end. Maybe Delta chat?

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 1 points 5 hours ago

why does matrix require you self hosting? There’s a bunch of free open-signup servers available

[–] Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip 14 points 10 hours ago

So happy the article linked to the Fediverse post, immediately liked and boosted it.

Never used SimpleX much really but will be immediately uninstalling it. Saw the guy's tweets, he's fucking insane, and retweets RFK Jr 🤢. Will do my best to inform others.

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 13 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I think it’d help them a lot to disable new signups on the m.org home server for a while and direct people to some of the other popular options, they spend too much on their own example server imo

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

It is a bit counter-intuitive but restricting new signups will not help them much. The way the matrix protocol is designed, i.e. replicating everything on every server, means that clients connecting to their server have only a minor impact. As long as most rooms of the entire matrix network are replicated on the matrix.org homeserver their costs will stay high and there isn't really much they can do about that other than shutting it down entirely.

[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

As long as most rooms of the entire matrix network are replicated on the matrix.org homeserver

Is this a dealbreaker for people though?

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 27 minutes ago

There is not much they can do about it short of shutting down the entire server. Due to how matrix functions internally any sufficiently large federated homeserver replicates most of the entire network.

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Personally have been hosting my own server for me and friends. Cheaper and easier than I expected it to be 🤠

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

cheap and easy? I tried running it myself and ran into several hurdles, and gave up. How did you host it? VPS? Docker? Bare-metal?

[–] aliceblossom@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm not who you replied to, but there is a big stack of ansible playbooks for it that make it pretty pushbutton. They primarily use docker. This is what I used and I got it setup in like an hour.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 31 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This article is nonsense. The Foundation was always a front for New Vector and their board is largely made up by New Vector employees. So of course they knew what was going on.

New Vector simply decided that the strategy to make Matrix appear as an open standard was against their business interests and thus left the foundation to fend for itself with obvious consequences.

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

Knowing it or not, the result is the same, isn't it?

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

Man, that's depressing, thanks for sharing, that was well worth the read

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

I like the concept of delta.chat the most. Anyone here use it? Any reason why it hasn't caught on?

Could it support technical FOSS channels with thousands of participants, like what IRC was awesome for and Matrix seems to be pretty ok at?

[–] OmegaSunkey@ani.social 1 points 1 hour ago

For me, the reason why Delta Chat hadn't caught up on me is stickers. There's a sticker picker on desktop, but not on mobile, and its behind more settings. Weird that it doesnt do it like WhatsApp where stickers are added to personal collections (favorites) that only sync between accounts and can be added manually; it's not necessary to make it like Telegram or Signal where you can add a collection from a repository.

For chatting it is really enough. Like email.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Deltachat works ok for 1:1 chats and small groups. It is totally unsuitable for large public channels as it doesn't really have a concept of group chats and just pretends so by (in email parlance) adds every one in 'CC'. This only works ok for small private groups.

IRC just needs to get it's shit together and start adopting IRCv3 features on the larger servers. The problem is really only that networks like libera.chat run a feature set that is at least 15 years behind what IRC can actually do.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 0 points 12 hours ago

Ah, too bad. That was perhaps too much to ask.