this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
875 points (79.9% liked)

You Should Know

39005 readers
676 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Quoting System of a Down: "Why don't you ask the kids at Tiananmen Square..."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This sounds like propaganda

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DerArzt@lemmy.world 118 points 1 day ago (24 children)

Okay but who's the one defining a protest as violent? You get enough people together and you're going to have some aseholes that damage property but are the minority. If chocolate can have 5% bugs, then protests should be able to have 5% violence and still be called peaceful.

Or heck, if people react when police instigate, should that be called a violent protest?

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] dom@lemmy.ca 111 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is this why the opposition always tries to escalate the peaceful movement into a violent one?

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 91 points 1 day ago

That, and so they have an excuse to incarcerate or kill the leadership, see: Haymarket 7, Joe Hill, &c

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fdnomad@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago

I honestly cant recall seeing any peaceful protest accomplishing anything of significance in my lifetime. Most successful protests I hear about are the French lighting up Paris when they try to raise the retirement age. They just try again 2 years later though.

[–] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 day ago (13 children)

The cries for violence here are quite disgusting. I understand our American friends are frustrated, but violence is only going to get you killed. The police in the US have been receiving military gear for decades now. If you want violence, you will get it.

Then there are some major misconceptions about the 3.5% rule. That is for persistent non-violent protests. Week in, week out, for months at a time, before this yields results. Violent protests drive away many of the people you need on board to achieve genuine change and make it exponentially harder to get to your 3.5%. Try getting a grandma or a family with kids to join when molotov cocktails are being thrown around.

So for everyone here calling for violence, you are idiots and you won't achieve a damn thing.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

One thing I love about the protests is seeing the little children and grandmothers marching side by side with my extraordinarily angry ass. Yeah I have to moderate my language a little, but I feel much less alone seeing a multi-generational sea of people standing with me.

[–] psychadlligoat@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

you're the bigger idiot if you think non-violence works against fascists, and you'll achieve even less (unless you count the deaths of innocents that are on your hands, coward)

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

600k Australians protested against the Iraq war in 2003.

The population was about 20m so 3.5% of that is 700k. So if another 100k had joined then the protest would have succeeded?

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, if another 100k Australians had come out and then kept protesting day in day out for weeks/months they would have got the aus government to back down and not support the war.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 31 points 1 day ago

STOP SPREADING THIS FUCKING LIE.

KING JUNIOR WAS DISLIKED DURING HIS NONVIOLENCE PROTEST.

IT IS PRECISELY VIOLENCE THAT THE STATE ENACTS THAT LEAD TO TRUMP’S REELECTION.

IF YOU WANT CHANGE, BE MORE UNGOVERNABLE THAN MAGA.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Keep Goodhart's law in mind:

"When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I have never known a North American protest to succeed at anything in my lifetime.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hegar@fedia.io 62 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's also important to remember that non-violence serves the interest of entrenched power. The state is at its core a violence-control structure. When people excersize the power of violence in their own interests, the state must reassert it's dominion or risk collapse.

Non-violent requests can be accommodated without elites feeling like their ill-gotten power is threatened. But it's often the violent demands that scare them into doing so.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›