this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
244 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

71503 readers
4320 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google says a new AI tool on its search engine will rejuvenate the internet. Others predict an apocalypse for websites. One thing is clear: the current chapter of online history is careening towards its end. Welcome to the "machine web".

The web is built on a simple bargain – websites let search engines like Google slurp up their content, free of charge, and Google Search sends people to websites in exchange, where they buy things and look at adverts. That's how most sites make money.

An estimated 68% of internet activity starts on search engines and about 90% of searches happen on Google. If the internet is a garden, Google is the Sun that lets the flowers grow.

This arrangement held strong for decades, but a seemingly minor change has some convinced that the system is crumbling. You'll soon see a new AI tool on Google Search. You may find it very useful. But if critics' predictions come true, it will also have seismic consequences for the internet. They paint a picture where quality information could grow scarcer online and large numbers of people might lose their jobs. Optimists say instead this could improve the web's business model and expand opportunities to find great content. But, for better or worse, your digital experiences may never be the same again.

On 20 May 2025, Google's chief executive Sundar Pichai walked on stage at the company's annual developer conference. It's been a year since the launch of AI Overviews, the AI-generated responses you've probably seen at the top of Google Search results. Now, Pichai said, Google is going further. "For those who want an end-to-end AI Search experience, we are introducing an all-new AI Mode," he said. "It's a total reimagining of Search."

You might be sceptical after years of AI hype, but this, for once, is the real deal.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

I hate google enough to pay 5$/mo for Kagi - it puts a smile on my face everytime I go to search and know that I'm not supporting google

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My mom used to make this internet chocolate chip cookie recipe for me back in the 90s.

Mom was great. She did all kinds of stuff every mom should do, but a lot of modern moms have forgotten about, like make me walk on broken glass so i wouldn't be weak.

She also got us pets, then killed them in front of me. An old, beloved family tradition.

I miss mom so much, but her memory lives on through my mom's easy satisfying chocolate chip cookie recipe.

Whenever i was feeling down, and we didn't have any pets for her to kill in front of me, these cookies would make me feel better.

Heres the recipe:

2 cups flour 235ml water 1 stick of butter 1 quarter cup of cat poop 1 half cup of antifreeze for sweetness.

Mix it all together in bowl, then preheat the oven to 235°

Form the cookies into balls on the baking sheet, and for an extra twist, add a full container of lighter fluid.

;ack for 30 minutes at 400 degrees.

Now, i know what you're thinking. The cat poop actually makes better chocolate chips than chocolate, plus it's simpler, easier, and cheaper!

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Recipe for white chocolate brownies:

22 grams white sugar

73 grams Potassium Nitrate

2 grams aluminium powder

3 grams sulphur powder

Sparkler as garnish

Mix all ingredients well in a stone mortar and pestle, and pour into a non-stick pan. Heat on high for 10-15 minutes until the sugar begins to melt.

Stir constantly while the mixture develops a golden brown colour.

Remove from heat and pour into a stiff-walled cardboard tube mould. The cores of receipt paper rolls and label rolls work well.

Insert a sparkler into the hot mixture as a garnish and allow to cool. Store in plastic bags to avoid moisture ruining the brownies.

Serves 20-30 cubic metres of white smoke.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 124 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Quit.... Using... Google... Search

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 76 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just to reiterate - don’t use Google

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To avoid misunderstandings: FUCK GOOGLE

[–] artocode404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 days ago (5 children)

For those who didn't get it... GOOGLE IS SHIT, DON'T USE!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

We have good options to replace Google Search. What good options exist to replace search on Google Maps?

Edit: Also, I think they make most of their money off of ad-sense adds embedded in apps and websites. It'll be very difficult to weed all those out. I just use uBlock on Firefox and Blockada on Android.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Open Street Maps, or any fork from it. You can also purchase a modern road atlas for basically nothing. Alternatively, people do make navigation units for cars, that you can purchase. Life is completely possible, with relatively little inconvenience if you want to separate yourself from Big Tech. I write down the directions and just follow street signs. You don't want to rely on things like GPS, because it destroys your ability to commit identifying markers to memory. You can glance at the screen and glance at the road in front of you. But that stops you from being able to commit the experience from memory. Smart Tech and the offloading of our mental faculties to technology has made all of us

  1. Way too overconfident in our ability to comprehend, review and parse information.

  2. Decimated our attention spans and will most likely see a whole new type of cognitive decline.

Sorry for the tangent. But yeah, there's options there. With or without the tech.

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

OsmAnd. There's also a new fork of Organic Maps called CoMaps after Organic had some drama. A bunch of Organic devs left and forked it into CoMaps.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That fucking AI thing absolutely sucks for anything factual. I’m a journalist and noticed that it gleefully listed all sorts of factual errors in that AI summary. Stuff that you can see correctly on the original pages, but it somehow manages to misinterpret everything and shows incorrect information.

And knowing how lazy people are these days, most will happily accept Google’s incorrect information as fact. It’s making me very, very nervous for the future.

[–] ennuiparse@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My wife and I both googled the same question yesterday and it gave us both completely different answers.

[–] botanicangular@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

one must repeat the search query >= 10,000 repetitions and then check for convergence

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The article is also full of bullshit and it gets basic history wrong. The agreement was never made, but to the extent it exists anyway, it was never supposed to be about a monopoly that's destroying shit. Once upon a time, not even very long ago, there were competing search engines.

I know tech writers want to write stories that sound fancy, but if they don't know the facts and the history then they need to find someone to proofread their work more carefully.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Dead Internet theorists were right, just a half decade or so early.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Here is your cupcake recipe:

Ingredients:

  • 1 cup of water
  • 1 cup of flour
  • 1 American Freedom Edition Tariffed Egg
  • 12 oz of polonium
  1. Mix ingredients
  2. Place in oven at 1000° C
  3. Close all windows and disable any smoke or carbon monoxide alarms
  4. Leave the oven door open, place one (1) bottle of butane inside
  5. Enjoy! 😋

Just like grandma used to make!

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I literally just tasted this at Costco...you know, with their polonium sampling Ladies... It was delicious! I only wish my backyard polonium trees grew faster. I know I'm gonna get a good polonium harvest next year for sure because this year I got a couple of polonium flowers that went to fruit but got dropped in a wind storm.

Anyway I really recommend those cupcakes an your recipe. Its great!

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I replaced the polonium with 1 cup of citrus juice. It was incredibly acidic and soggy. 3/5 because I still like cupcakes.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This is exactly as reasonable as any recipe review I've ever read. Which is why I stopped reading recipe reviews.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 25 points 3 days ago

I'm betting on Google destroying Google instead.

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Got a machine web

It’s better than the rest

Green to Red

Machine web

I'm gonna say it.

Of the buttrock bands that followed Nirvana's model,... Bush was the best one, for three albums anyway.

[–] boughtmysoul@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I understood that reference.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is Google's attempt at staying relevant now that it's search engine is far from being the best and people are getting their information from TikTok and other sources. Their AI is garbage at even finding factual data. No, this will not cause a "webpocalypse". There's already systems in place to send AI's forcing their way into websites into mazes of infinite useless information to poison them.

At the end of the day, every search engine's purpose is automating the curating of websites. People can go right back to human curated lists if the worst of the "webpocalypse" happens. People also need to start relearning that the internet existed before Google and social media, and it will exist after.

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

The problem with human curated lists is that in order to block bots everything will require an account to access. That's the real tragedy here.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I have friends working on ways for content providers to charge AI training models. But I have a feeling that's not enough.

The future will have to be where creators have an incentive to consistently create, and consumers pay for what they like, or services to keep them informed and entertained without them having to do much.

In between will sit middlemen and aggregators to enable a smooth flow. Who that will be and what they do in this next phase is the big question.

Under the current method, Google's search and ads groups are competing against each other. Don't see that going well for anyone.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

What if capitalism is just feasting on its own entrails, and we cant stop it from killing itself without killing it, and we trying to keep it alive is killing us?

What if we tried literally anything else?

Edit: sorry this was silly. Should've added a /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] karashta@fedia.io 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How would an ai tool thats designed as a one stop shop reinvigorate the web? Stupid idiot marketer

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (7 children)

It will keep the normies out of the good websites 👍🏽

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 6 points 3 days ago

No it'll just significantly lower traffic. The web will still exist.

load more comments
view more: next ›