this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
211 points (99.1% liked)

News

35915 readers
3162 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Changes to regulations in Great Britain mean more than 100 items are now allowed to carry more pesticides when sold to the public, ranging from potatoes to onions, grapes to avocados, and coffee to rice.

For tea, the maximum residue level (MRL) was increased by 4,000 times for both the insecticide chlorantraniliprole and the fungicide boscalid. For the controversial weedkiller glyphosate, classed as a “probable human carcinogen” by the World Health Organization (WHO), the MRL for beans was raised by 7.5 times.

The purpose of the pesticide MRL regime is to protect public health, wildlife and the natural environment. Campaigners said the list of pesticides included reproductive toxins and carcinogens and that the weaker MRLs reduced protections for consumers in Great Britain. Northern Ireland has retained the EU MRLs.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Freedom!!
It must feel glorious.

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dont know what is revealed there, it was just a question when they will increase it as the (non existing anymore) regulations regulated the use.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You seem to misunderstand how it works.
EU doesn't make laws, the EU regulations were written into UK law, just as with any other member country. So the regulation most definitely still existed for UK after Brexit, and had to be removed from the UK law to achieve this "progress of greater freedom".
So what is revealed is that UK ACTUALLY changed it for the worse, just as many predicted they would.

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dont get what you are saying tbh i never said EU made the laws in there, you just repeat what i (indirect) told. That UK no longer have / follow those rules / regulations / recommendations from the EU.

[–] flyingSock@feddit.org 2 points 1 year ago

The point was that this was a change that required an explicit act by parliament to happen, i.e. they made a concious choice to increase the limits. The laws did not automatically revert/change when brexit was decided.

So the timeline is: UK as part of EU adopts the regulation into national law. UK leaves EU, national law is unchanged by this (so regulation persists). UK makes a new national law changing the amount of pesticide residue allowed to be higher.

Am on mobile please excuse typos

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just as we said would happen, but thanks to poor education and prime propaganda, the general public seemed to care more about "bendy bananas" than they did about the levels of poison allowed in our food (helped, of course, by the media massively playing it down, just like they did the so called "Brexit bonfire").

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

Freedom tastes of glyphosate.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Wasn't that part of the point of Brexit?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The WHO considers "red meat" to be a "probable carcinogen".

The question is: are these new levels still considered "safe"?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The WHO considers “red meat” to be a “probable carcinogen”.

Yes, because of "science".

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577092/

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes. Which is why it's very misleading to say that glyphosate is "classed as a 'probable human carcinogen'" without any context.

Most people will assume that means it's more dangerous than it is.

Like - if you phrased it as "glyphosate is about as carcinogenic as a steak" then it rather loses its punch as a propaganda statement.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Probable carcinogen" doesn't mean "same risk as any other probable carcinogen".

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Again - my point being made. Why even mention it if not to poison the well?