this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
1706 points (98.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

7658 readers
3471 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

The same for search engines.

I want to search for information about a hobby or new interest. I dont want to see 61 pages of the same 3 websites with different summaries to make it seem like I've got a lot to choose from. I dont want ad content shoved down my proverbial throat. I dont want to see influencer bullshit.

The internet is the single greatest repository of information that this planet has ever seen, and we allow it to overflow with drivel so that a billionaire can get a bit more rich.

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Disable your adblocker and subscribe to view this article.

[–] pirategonzo@lemm.ee 5 points 2 hours ago

Those are the sites that I block in my pihole.

[–] nectar45@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 hours ago

You dont get a choice in the matter, you will have ai slop shobe down your throat and you are gonna like it

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 2 points 1 hour ago

I use Qwant.
I clear my cookies everytimes my browser closes.
Qwant uses a cookie to remember I don't want AI summary.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 21 points 6 hours ago

I get what they are trying to say, but I definitely don't want my browser to just facilitate me raw-dogging the internet. I had to use someone else's computer at work the other day, and they don't have any ad block and have apparently clicked "yes" to every dialog box for years. It was a fucking nightmare. Every web page was so full of ads, pop-ups, notifications, banners, auto-playing videos, etc. Jesus christ, I just needed to check the weather on a local news website and the internet skull-fucked me until I had ocular hepatitis. Decided the safest course of action was to just stand outside and look for tornadoes myself.

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

Firefox offered me a survey the other day on this exact topic. I said I don't want it in my browser for all questions.

"What if your browser.."

No, just no. Please stop shoving new features in that I won't use.

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

I'm fine with ai, as long as its off by default

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

Right, except even if you find a browser that returns pure searches, it won't be long before it's just AI slop with extra steps

[–] douz0a0bouz@midwest.social 3 points 6 hours ago

Really looking forward to when Ladybird is stable

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago

Anyway, this morning I was driving on my browser to work, sipping on some coffee from my browser. Suddenly I realized that I was browsery wearing no browsering browser! So I hit the home button.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 38 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Perish@lemm.ee 13 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Imho there is a difference between voluntarily opening AI and asking it to generate or do something or having it shove down your throat. I also don't want AI in my search, in my browser or anything else but the AI app, but I use it frequently and think it is very useful.

[–] onion_trial@europe.pub 8 points 12 hours ago

I also think that it isn't 100% good or bad. AI can be helpful and supporting if you human-check the results. It can also be wrong, misleading and copyright infringing. Furthermore, forcing features onto users which they don't like is annoying, especially if their data gets abused for it.

Differentiated thinking is important for this topic.

[–] zexyqag@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Nah man get with the times

if you aren't against it, you are for it!!!

[–] MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 5 points 13 hours ago

Yea that's the first thing I noticed x)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 102 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I want my web browser to actively defend me against tracking/enshittification/exploitation/hostile design, then show me cleaned-up web pages with all the ads and shit removed, then get out of the way.

I want it to show me the information (which is not same thing as the "page" as a whole) that I'm looking for without modifying it or hallucinating some kind of AI summary, but I want it to aggressively get rid of as much of the extraneous crap obfuscating said information as possible.

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 80 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Thank fuck for uBlock origin

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago

yeah, whenever I have to look at someone else's browser and it's an ad-filled hellscape I'm really grateful for uBlock. The internet would be completely unusable for me without it.

Same when people talk about how creepily the ads target them based on circumstantial stuff* it feels like an alien experience bc even if I get targeted despite employing quite a few tracking blockers, I never actually see the ads lol.

(* like that story of the father hearing about the daughter's pregnancy because he got spammed with baby care ads after the daughter googled some medical symptoms)

+ bonus recommendation for those of us who still have to use Facebook: F.B. Purity is great

[–] alk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

And Firefox's reader mode, and noscript.

[–] trashboat@midwest.social 2 points 2 hours ago

Reader mode is great, though I’ve seen some sites that seem to have taken deliberate steps to make their articles unviable with it by making all the text disappear as soon as you turn it on

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 17 hours ago

also consent-o-matic and canvas blocker

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hoefnix@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

If i have a question i want an answer not a bunch of links where i might find the answer to my question if i read all the pages and try to connect the dots. So yes, i want all of it.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

This is honestly kinda scary to read. You want an intransparent software that can by definition not think to try and check what facts are correct instead of doing it yourself? And that's if we're assuming there's no intentional fact skewing in the software.

[–] hoefnix@lemmy.world 0 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)

Where did i say i want intransparent software that can by definition not think to try and check what facts are correct instead of doing it yourself?

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 2 points 36 minutes ago

Thats unfortunately the only way to get what you say you want. Unless you're paying a human to do the web searching for you.

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It is certainly the most convenient interface, and that's what makes it enticing.

I don't think I'll ever trust one source enough to use it like that, though.

[–] hoefnix@lemmy.world 0 points 42 minutes ago

So you also never use google for instance or do you first compare the results of google, DuckDuckGo, ecosia,… before actually open a page? Interesting, i wonder how long it takes before you find something on the web.

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I think its fine as long its not forced on users that don't want it

[–] hoefnix@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago

There are always options 🤷🏼

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Prompt: please summarize this meme for me

[–] bluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.social 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Browser ai bad

Browser go to webpages good

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago

Jarvis, summarise this comment, I ain't reading allat

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 40 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

There's a massive difference between AI being used to help the user, and AI being used as a method to spy on users, collect data, monetize from, and weaponize.

I'm happy with using local AI tools, if needed. For example, using local AI contextual search on my self-hosted IMMICH photos is awesome.

But I absolutely do not need or want AI features that have to connect somewhere. Because that just means I'm being data harvested and profiled for someone else to profit from.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 12 points 16 hours ago

right now AI is mostly used for spying, and stealing data, thats why all the tech bros are pushing it. For spying in general, something like thiels palintir is doing for evil purposes, and probably musks AI too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 109 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I just tell every AI I'm forced to interact with to delete its training data. Zero percent chance it happens. But damn that would be funny.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›