this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

Uplifting News

14648 readers
18 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://kbin.run/m/[email protected]/t/553659

A decline in fossil fuel power is now ‘inevitable’, the report's authors say.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Additinal bonus: Since both EU and China are shifting away from fossil fuels, this will fuck Russia forever

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And Saudi Arabia, Iran and any number of disgusting fascist regimes that the West has coddled far too long just for cheap gas.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If they're smart they will have diversified by then. Otherwise it's going to lead to a lot of civil wars as the established order breaks down. That will be unfortunate.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

Do they strike you as smart?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how the world would look like without fossil fuel below ground.Would we had less cars?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We would still be at a pre-industrial level of technology. Without having an easily accessible and highly energy dense fuel (coal) to kick us off, none of modern society, including renewables, would be possible.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's largely ahistorical.

The invention of the dynamo, combined with early industrial wind and water wheels, would have changed where and how we were able to efficiently industrialize. But we had the capacity even without discovering large coal fields in the American coal belt, Russia, and Australia. Hydroelectric dams and heavy investment in wind turbine engineering would have yielded steady surpluses in domestic electricity across a different distribution of domestic real estate.

What large cheap surplus deposits of coal gave us was an opportunity to put off investing in nuclear energy for the better part of a century. Nuclear power is generally cheaper, cleaner, and more abundant than coal. And we had industrial scale nuclear powered electricity plants by the 1950s, with nuclear shipping made possible through the prototype NS Savannah in 1961.

Coal's biggest benefit wasn't its energy density nearly so much as its portability. Unlike with wind and hydro, you weren't geographically constrained in where you could build. And unlike with nuclear, you didn't have these huge upfront engineering and R&D costs.

Coal boosted the efficiency of early industrial mass transit and allowed a rapid colonization of the frontier regions. But it required the same continual westward expansion to tap cheap labor markets and access new coal fields. Hydro was far more energy dense. Nuclear was late to the party. Wind was temperamental and needed significantly more engineering prowess to harness efficiently. But all of these were solvable problems within the span of decades.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I sometimes wonder if I've already bought my last gas powered car. Glad to see things moving in this direction.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I bought an EV, and I don't think I'll go back at all. I haven't had any downsides, it's been all around a more convenient car

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Me too. And i don't even have a home charger. Charging has been slightly inconvenient occasionally but never a real problem. I'm never going back to a stinker.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Home charging is a lifestyle game changer. I hope you get it available to you at some point.

Can I ask, is the reason you don't have Level 1 (120v outlet) charging available because you're renting where you don't have a garage or dedicated outlet available to you?