this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
1198 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

7012 readers
1300 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You fucking idiots. Real ones know wetness is how much vermouth it has in it.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago

Churchill apocryphally liked his martinis so dry that he would observe the bottle of vermouth while pouring the gin, and that was enough

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'd like a proper wet and dirty one right now, gawddamn

[–] littlebrother@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Police. Yeah I'd like to report a murder.

[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Good luck finding the body, that lake never gives up her dead

[–] littlebrother@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

When the skies of November turn gloomy

Yes but water touches itself. Abortion ain't murder though.

[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'd still argue water molecules touching eachother make themselves wet, but that guy is an ass so fuck him.

[–] klao@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

actually water molecules are cohesive (attracted to each other, yes in that sense you are right) but wetness is associated with adhesion which basically means the possibility of a liquid to adhere to a solid surface so no, water molecule themselves alone are not enough to fit into the definition of wetness i hope i wasnt too technical but i tried to be as dummy as possible

[–] orochi02@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago

Nevermind what his view on abortion is. Why does he have to start something on a post about womens rights unless he thinks they should not have rights?

[–] briever@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

That is outstanding.

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Just wait till lakes home pull up..

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 89 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

The irony of this statement—for any one who’s ever been in Lake Superior—is immense.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Critical hit! It's super effective!

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

"Lake Savage" hits harder in my opinion

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

unless theres more than one molecule of water, its touching itself

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had no idea that a lake could be so saucy with the comebacks. Glad to hear that it lives up to its name.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Getting into a political argument with a lake account. The lake account using 1st person language as Lake Superior.

Our ancestors would marvel at our reality!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mlegstrong@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago (23 children)

A single molecule of water is not wet but as soon as more then one molecule is present the water is then wet. That is my hill to die on in this argument.

[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

A single drop has over 1.5 sextillion molecules (21 zeroes), so yeh even a single drop is wet, debates over cuz allow it.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (8 children)

Wwweeeeeeeellllllll see, water is also touching itself constantly. Something being wet is a material surrounded by water, like the fibers of a sponge surrounded by water, in example.

In water, every water molecule is surrounded by water molecules. This means every given water molecule can be considered wet. And thus water is wet.

[–] klao@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

no, if water was just hydrogens yes but no because then its no longer water but with the oxygen the water molecules are not exactly touching each other plus the definition of wetness is about the adhesion (liquid to solid surface contact) and water is cohesive (attracted to each other)

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Something being wet is a material surrounded by water

So if I set my hand in water it's not wet because it's not immersed? What if it's not water?
Can other liquids be wet? If I dump water into a bucket of gasoline, is my gasoline wet?
If I mix a soluble powder into water, like sugar, do I have wet sugar or sugared water? Do they have to be in contact? Is a phone in a bag in water wet because it's surrounded by water, or dry because there's air between it and the water?
What about those hydrophobic materials that can be dunked in water and come out dry? What about non-liquid phases of water? Is steam wet? If I dump water on ice is there a difference in how wet it is?

The common colloquial definition of "wet" is "to be touched by a liquid". The scientific is for a liquid to displace a gas to maintain contact with a surface via intramolecular forces. Water becomes a better wetter if we add soap because it no longer tries to bind to itself instead of what it's wetting.

Neither of these has the water itself being wet, but you can have "wet ice".

Let's not pretend that a more scientific sounding colloquial definition is actually more scientific.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
  1. Maybe. You are made mostly of water, so I don't see why lot.
  2. Same logic applies to liquids that aren't water.
  3. Gasoline being wet is an actual term, though.
  4. Yes, you have wet sugar. The sugar has just become reeeaaaally really small.
  5. The phone is dry. The bag it's in is moist.
  6. If those materials are so scared of water, they shouldn't be near water.
  7. Steam has air between it. It's dry or moist. Ice is just water holding g hands.
[–] klao@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

you're right about this

“to be touched by a liquid”

but its more of a simple definition however if you went more technical by biology and chemistry laws, wetness is about adhesion (liquid to solid surface contact) and water is cohesive (attracted to each other) but if you want to get reallyyyy into it you might tell me about mercurium, have you seen mercurium? because its freaking cool btw chemistry ftw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upRM7ykQloI the reason why mercurium wont wet things is because its cohesion is stronger than its adhesion, so any liquid that happens to be like this, this is why

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›