this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
327 points (98.2% liked)

World News

46671 readers
2123 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A lodging facility in Kyoto has drawn a protest from the Israeli Embassy in Tokyo for asking an Israeli man to sign a pledge that he had never been involved in war crimes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 48 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If being asked to confirm that you have not committed war crimes makes you uncomfortable, then you might be a war criminal.

I'm pretty sure Japan's immigration asks if you've ever been convicted of a crime, so how is this any different?

It's different because no jury in Israel will convict someone of warcrimes (against Palestinians).

No conviction, no crime. EZ.

[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 64 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Classic Japanese. No dancing around or confusion about anti-semitism, just straight out asking the Israeli about recent war crimes.

Had the same as a Swiss guy living there: sure, everybody loves Roger Federer, but they also know about Nazi gold and the banking secret protecting dictatorships. And they just ask about it directly. Would never happen on Japanese topics though.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 78 points 6 days ago (16 children)

This right here is what I love about Japan.

When I was there a few years ago to snowboard, they had a "fuck you" policy to non-Japanese speakers in some towns because the Aussies basically run around rough shod and turn everything into a loud party.

Imagine being in a sleepy resort town while 7 dudes are walking down your cobbled street screaming about Ruggers, then one falls into the cold stream because they're drunk, so a rescue team is sent out... On a weekly basis.

There's simply a no more bullshit cap.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What was the policy? Or was it just that they literally said "fuck you?"

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 7 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Not literally those words. From what I've seen online, various establishments, if not entire towns, have thrown up "Japanese only" or "Japanese language only" to discourage foreigners. They generally only do this after there's been a trend of tourists making asses of themselves, but since the first places to do it kind of went viral, it's not too surprising if the habit has sprung up elsewhere.

Sure, it's only a handful of disrespectful tourists when all the rest are fine, but if you allow any non-Japanese (person or language, pick your preference) eventually you'll get those tourists.

Like it or not, it's a simple way to say no to that.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 days ago

Not only that, it's not a hard and fast rule. The operative word is "discourage." If you're polite, ask nicely, have at least a rudimentary level of skill in the language, the staff will most assuredly seat you.

I was trying to get into this one sushi place in Nagano for weeks when I was there, finally threw up my hands and just walked over. Very modest, very simple, and probably the best I had while I was in the country.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I have no idea why the west is so ok with Japan's ranked competitive racism...

Because it still keeps up the bs mist of "undiscovered fancy place to visit" that attracts dumbasses and neckbeards who spend their days taking up-skirt pics, riding e-scooters like idiots, and getting cheapshit games for their old consoles at barely cheaper than US prices.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 4 points 6 days ago

Yeah, that's racism.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As an Australian, what the fuck is a ruggers?

[–] punksnotdead@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

That's how English aristocrats (and aristocrat wannabes) say rugby. Whether that's what they mean I dunno though

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

Too right. Pip pip, cheerio!

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's the bog standard for saying rugby. Don't get yer daks tied up, not trying to get you mad as a cut snake. Ruggers is exy, mate.

Of course everything I'm saying might be furphy.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

Me, too, man. Me, too.

[–] moodymellodrone@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not only that, but it happened in Kyoto which is verryyy traditional. Plus it’s a small city that’s getting overrun with tourists. It was the only place where I felt bad for visiting. I mean it’s packed at especially the temples, you’re slow walking in this sea of people.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah. The shit they were doing with geishas is fucky.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 58 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wait, so Israel is not even trying to distance itself from war crimes... Their actual point is "not all war crimes are equal and it's difamatory to label everyone who commits war crimes with the same 'war criminal' label"... Wtf is wrong with those people.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

No, their point is you shouldn’t be randomly asking Israelis if they committed war crimes.

The article points out there are ten nations whose citizens they ask this question.

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 29 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Based on the article there's nothing random about it and it's not just any citizen. They ask it of people who served on nations that have active conflicts. So basically, people who might have been in position to commit war crimes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago

If israel doesn't like this treatment then they should stop the policy of forcing israeli citizens to serve in the israel genocide forces.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago

Its what the free market wants ;)

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What's the protest? "We don't want to be pointed at when we commit war crimes" ?

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The embassy thinks it is messed up to ask people if they committed war crimes.

This is ignoring they ask people from 10 different nations this question.

[–] loki@piefed.social 6 points 6 days ago

Is "asking" messed up or committing war crimes more messed up?

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 6 points 6 days ago (3 children)

How could any Israeli citizen say no on #3 At this point. Even if you arent directly committing atrocities yourself you still are funding the government engaging in it. Not to mention most all of them have served in one capacity or another (involuntary aspects nonwithstanding)

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 36 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

This honestly doesn't make much sense. The implication would be that all citizens are culpable for their government's actions once they start paying taxes.

Funding your government isn't a voluntary act, so your last parenthetical already invalidates most of what you said.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

So by that logic, are all Americans war criminals because Americans pay taxes, which go to fund drone strikes that murder civilians overseas, domestic militarization of police, prisons, etc?

This is the same logic as "all Palastinians support Hamas."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Phineaz@feddit.org 7 points 6 days ago (5 children)

So ... we should've hanged all the Germans in '45? The child soldiers drafted in Berlin? Shot the entire Japanese army? Drag all US-citizens to court for acting against the constitution?

I am going to be downvoted to oblivion, but: Lock up all Palestinians for not extraditing terrorists and war criminals?

Where do you think this will go, honestly? How is any of that justified, or fair? Should we commit a genocide of our own upon the Israelis? I know that's not what you said and I very much hope it's not what you meant.

This platform sometimes, fuck me.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›