I will vote for whoever isn’t the disgusting republican traitor. But give me fucking AOC, ffs.
United States | News & Politics
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
I'd vote for a literal dog at this point as long as it had competent, non fascist advisors.
They don't want a safe candidate. A safe candidate would be someone who takes broadly popular positions, like Medicare for All, a jobs guarantee, or public internet. They want centrist candidates, which the consultant class has convinced them is safe (and, coincidentally, never take positions that upset the donors), but centrism is the least safe position to take at this point. No one who is watching their wages stagnate while the cost of living skyrockets is thinking, "I hope this can be solved through incremental changes that don't disrupt that status-quo too much!"
They want centrist candidates, which the consultant class has convinced them is safe
They want centrist candidates and don't care if they're safe.
I think there's legitimate self-delusion that keeps some of them believing the centrist is the safe choice. Some of them delude themselves into thinking that being centrist is a good idea because people don't like, "wokeness." Some of them convince themselves that if they're too progressive, the donors will abandon them and they won't have enough money to win. I think the old timers like Carvil legitimately think that centrism is the best strategy because they can't get past 1992. But yeah, I think deep down, they would all prefer losing with a neoliberal centrist than winning with an actual progressive, even if some of them won't admit it.
Yep. They want another billion in campaign donations, even if it ends in a loss.
Yeah, they want to ride the edge and put forth the most conservative a candidate possible that still has a plausible road to victory (and the plausibility can be pretty thin). The last few candidates haven't been anywhere close to just lining up with the most popular issues (either within the Democratic party or the larger electorate).
It's just insane. People are so desperate for change that they're willing to vote for fascism, and the Democrats are trying to put run a moderate conservative. If they're not completely delusional, then they must believe the James Carvils of the party who are telling them they just have to wait for the Republicans to become unpopular again to take power. In the best case scenario, they'll win in four years, then lose in another 4 (probably to a more competent fascist) because people will see they're not doing anything for them.
I'm feeling deja vu from 2016. Hopefully the primary electorate has learned something that the establishment has not.
The problem is that the party has a lot of control over the primary; they can keep people off the ballot, they can decide who gets to debate, they can set a primary schedule that favors preferred candidates...The reason we got Biden in 2020 was because Barack Obama made a bunch of phone calls and got everyone who would have spit Biden's vote share to drop out. Progressives need to spend the next four years calling out this corruption and excising these people from the party at the state and national levels.
Democrats are gonna blow it on a fucking centrist again
Organize now and win primaries later. Shove a progressive down the DNC's throat like Trump shoved himself down the RNC's throat in 2016.
2016, 2020, and 2024 made it obvious the Democratic Party will never let a progressive win the election. They will do whatever they need to do to mess with the election to prevent that from happening. 2016 they manipulated the media heavily, used delegates to manipulate numbers early to build support for her, manipulated graphs to make him seem like he was doing badly, constantly misconstrued Bernie's ideas in media interviews, gave her debate questions, and showed empty podiums Trump would sit at instead of Bernie speeches. 2020 they brought in Bloomberg who only entered to make sure Bernie didn't win, also did some media manipulation, kept trying to coopt some of his ideas in a more watered down form, and then called everyone but Warren, who shared the most voters with Bernie, to drop out at the same time after it looked like he could win. In 2024 they basically didn't even have a primary, with no debates, interviews with candidates, or anything, and even skipped it in some states. Once that process was over, he just handed the candidacy over to his VP.
They will always tip the scales and will never let it be fair if there is a danger of an outsider winning. The Democratic Party is a bunch of donors and industry staffers in a trench coat. I've basically given up on having any hope in it, this last election and it's support for "the most lethal army in the world" while we're enabling a genocide was the last straw.
Trump won because he threatened to run as an independent and spoil the Republicans chances. The DNC would rather let the Republicans win then let a progressive independent win. If we can't get a real progressive on the ballot, we can't wait for election day to do something about it
Their corporate donation spice must flow, and a progressive platform isn't what is requested.
Democratic voters need to find their balls and brains to deny the establishment their choice instead of reluctantly getting behind the MSNBC boosted candidate. The best thing we can do for the Democratic party at this moment is criticize the fuck our of establishment bullshit.
Democratic voters need to find their balls and brains to deny the establishment their choice instead of reluctantly getting behind the MSNBC boosted candidate.
If it looks like that's going to happen, they just won't bother with primaries.
Again.
DNC donors want a corporate stooge for president who does nothing and says nothing they don't approve of.
Crockett said Democrats have ‘this fear’ about voting for a woman again after Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton lost
Both had a VP named Tim. Need to run a third trial where a safe white man runs with a VP candidate with the name Tim to confirm that isn't the issue.
I am an extremely safe looking whiteboy and I'd love nothing more than an AOC pres and Crockett vice pres ticket. That shit would be awesome.
So they're already trying to throw the 2028 election. For fuck's sake
Of course. People should already organise around an alternative.
AOC and BERNIE!
Sanders will be 86 by the time of the next election. It's time to stop pushing for him. It's not going to happen, and probably wouldn't be a great idea if it did.
Sanders will be 86 by the time of the next election.
We care about age now that we no longer have to pretend that biden is lucid.
Are you looking for another president who has to be wheeled onto the stage to repeat "and by the way" over and over for 90 minutes?
It's not that the candidates are women, POC, nonbinary!!! It's they're Republicans (DINOs).
That said, I like Jasmine. Afaik
It's already newsom. They just haven't done kabuki primaries yet. If they deign to at all.
Newsome is such a corrupt slime. He let PG&E get away with literal murder for shareholder profit. He was married to that god awful Guifoille lady. He’s also related to Pelosi and now he has a podcast where he talks to Nazis. California should be leading the way with healthcare, education and job protections but we’re not in fact California enabled and coddled the rise of broligarch facism. People always talk about the homeless crisis in California that was in large part caused by the tech broligarchy. Strap in America because there going to be a homelessness and then a mass incarceration explosion. Voting for Newsome in his ivory tower would just be a vote for the broligarchs.
"kabuki primaries" 😂
No one wants more California policies and politics. He is a hard sell to most of the US states.
I certainly will not vote for Newsom or Buttigieg. Unless some other incredible candidate comes out of the woodworks, I'll be AOC or bust if she decides to run.
AOC with Crockett as vice pres.
It's gonna be Pete, Newsome, or fettermen. ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ progressives are gonna loooove these options /s
Your Republicans and most Democrats are two sides of the same medal
They're both funded by the same ~~people~~ corporations, so many of their goals are the same.
"Safe" is how we got fucking Trump and the Turdpublicans running amok. How about we try some socialism, instead of unbridled capitalism?