this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
205 points (94.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2897 readers
1020 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 117 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I will vote for whoever isn’t the disgusting republican traitor. But give me fucking AOC, ffs.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'd vote for a literal dog at this point as long as it had competent, non fascist advisors.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 94 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

They don't want a safe candidate. A safe candidate would be someone who takes broadly popular positions, like Medicare for All, a jobs guarantee, or public internet. They want centrist candidates, which the consultant class has convinced them is safe (and, coincidentally, never take positions that upset the donors), but centrism is the least safe position to take at this point. No one who is watching their wages stagnate while the cost of living skyrockets is thinking, "I hope this can be solved through incremental changes that don't disrupt that status-quo too much!"

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They want centrist candidates, which the consultant class has convinced them is safe

They want centrist candidates and don't care if they're safe.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

I think there's legitimate self-delusion that keeps some of them believing the centrist is the safe choice. Some of them delude themselves into thinking that being centrist is a good idea because people don't like, "wokeness." Some of them convince themselves that if they're too progressive, the donors will abandon them and they won't have enough money to win. I think the old timers like Carvil legitimately think that centrism is the best strategy because they can't get past 1992. But yeah, I think deep down, they would all prefer losing with a neoliberal centrist than winning with an actual progressive, even if some of them won't admit it.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yep. They want another billion in campaign donations, even if it ends in a loss.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, they want to ride the edge and put forth the most conservative a candidate possible that still has a plausible road to victory (and the plausibility can be pretty thin). The last few candidates haven't been anywhere close to just lining up with the most popular issues (either within the Democratic party or the larger electorate).

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's just insane. People are so desperate for change that they're willing to vote for fascism, and the Democrats are trying to put run a moderate conservative. If they're not completely delusional, then they must believe the James Carvils of the party who are telling them they just have to wait for the Republicans to become unpopular again to take power. In the best case scenario, they'll win in four years, then lose in another 4 (probably to a more competent fascist) because people will see they're not doing anything for them.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm feeling deja vu from 2016. Hopefully the primary electorate has learned something that the establishment has not.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem is that the party has a lot of control over the primary; they can keep people off the ballot, they can decide who gets to debate, they can set a primary schedule that favors preferred candidates...The reason we got Biden in 2020 was because Barack Obama made a bunch of phone calls and got everyone who would have spit Biden's vote share to drop out. Progressives need to spend the next four years calling out this corruption and excising these people from the party at the state and national levels.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Democrats are gonna blow it on a fucking centrist again

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Organize now and win primaries later. Shove a progressive down the DNC's throat like Trump shoved himself down the RNC's throat in 2016.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

2016, 2020, and 2024 made it obvious the Democratic Party will never let a progressive win the election. They will do whatever they need to do to mess with the election to prevent that from happening. 2016 they manipulated the media heavily, used delegates to manipulate numbers early to build support for her, manipulated graphs to make him seem like he was doing badly, constantly misconstrued Bernie's ideas in media interviews, gave her debate questions, and showed empty podiums Trump would sit at instead of Bernie speeches. 2020 they brought in Bloomberg who only entered to make sure Bernie didn't win, also did some media manipulation, kept trying to coopt some of his ideas in a more watered down form, and then called everyone but Warren, who shared the most voters with Bernie, to drop out at the same time after it looked like he could win. In 2024 they basically didn't even have a primary, with no debates, interviews with candidates, or anything, and even skipped it in some states. Once that process was over, he just handed the candidacy over to his VP.

They will always tip the scales and will never let it be fair if there is a danger of an outsider winning. The Democratic Party is a bunch of donors and industry staffers in a trench coat. I've basically given up on having any hope in it, this last election and it's support for "the most lethal army in the world" while we're enabling a genocide was the last straw.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump won because he threatened to run as an independent and spoil the Republicans chances. The DNC would rather let the Republicans win then let a progressive independent win. If we can't get a real progressive on the ballot, we can't wait for election day to do something about it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

Their corporate donation spice must flow, and a progressive platform isn't what is requested.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 28 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Democratic voters need to find their balls and brains to deny the establishment their choice instead of reluctantly getting behind the MSNBC boosted candidate. The best thing we can do for the Democratic party at this moment is criticize the fuck our of establishment bullshit.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Democratic voters need to find their balls and brains to deny the establishment their choice instead of reluctantly getting behind the MSNBC boosted candidate.

If it looks like that's going to happen, they just won't bother with primaries.

Again.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

They’re trying to avoid centrists, they want right wing

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 60 points 2 weeks ago

DNC donors want a corporate stooge for president who does nothing and says nothing they don't approve of.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Crockett said Democrats have ‘this fear’ about voting for a woman again after Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton lost

Both had a VP named Tim. Need to run a third trial where a safe white man runs with a VP candidate with the name Tim to confirm that isn't the issue.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago

I am an extremely safe looking whiteboy and I'd love nothing more than an AOC pres and Crockett vice pres ticket. That shit would be awesome.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

So they're already trying to throw the 2028 election. For fuck's sake

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Of course. People should already organise around an alternative.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Sanders will be 86 by the time of the next election. It's time to stop pushing for him. It's not going to happen, and probably wouldn't be a great idea if it did.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Sanders will be 86 by the time of the next election.

We care about age now that we no longer have to pretend that biden is lucid.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Are you looking for another president who has to be wheeled onto the stage to repeat "and by the way" over and over for 90 minutes?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 27 points 2 weeks ago

It's not that the candidates are women, POC, nonbinary!!! It's they're Republicans (DINOs).

That said, I like Jasmine. Afaik

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Guillotine for president 2028

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's already newsom. They just haven't done kabuki primaries yet. If they deign to at all.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Newsome is such a corrupt slime. He let PG&E get away with literal murder for shareholder profit. He was married to that god awful Guifoille lady. He’s also related to Pelosi and now he has a podcast where he talks to Nazis. California should be leading the way with healthcare, education and job protections but we’re not in fact California enabled and coddled the rise of broligarch facism. People always talk about the homeless crisis in California that was in large part caused by the tech broligarchy. Strap in America because there going to be a homelessness and then a mass incarceration explosion. Voting for Newsome in his ivory tower would just be a vote for the broligarchs.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

"kabuki primaries" 😂

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

No one wants more California policies and politics. He is a hard sell to most of the US states.

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 19 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I certainly will not vote for Newsom or Buttigieg. Unless some other incredible candidate comes out of the woodworks, I'll be AOC or bust if she decides to run.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

AOC with Crockett as vice pres.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's gonna be Pete, Newsome, or fettermen. ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ progressives are gonna loooove these options /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I sure hope it's Joe Biden!

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Your Republicans and most Democrats are two sides of the same medal

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

They're both funded by the same ~~people~~ corporations, so many of their goals are the same.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 10 points 2 weeks ago

"Safe" is how we got fucking Trump and the Turdpublicans running amok. How about we try some socialism, instead of unbridled capitalism?

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is no-one going to tell them?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›