this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
131 points (97.1% liked)

News

36942 readers
2569 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

An estimated $570 billion is loaded onto gift and prepaid cards each year in the United States

Holy crap, I had no idea that so many people buy these stupid things. My mother used to buy them. She'd give Visa $5 in order to give me a $100 gift card. I told her she was wasting her money and she should just write me a check but she just kept doing it.

Based on the fee schedule at this site, that 5% fee is normal. That means these companies are making $28.5 billion per year providing no useful service at all.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

they're huge in the homeless community. it's the only way a person with no bank can pay for most things these days.

the homeless community is rapidly growing too.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Starbucks had 1.2 billion USD held on Starbucks cards/the app back in 2016, “enough to be a midsize bank,” and I can only imagine it’s gone up since.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

$1.2 billion would be a very small bank. But also, that money is not able to be used by Starbucks. It's not "earned" yet. I don't know the details on what they can invest it in, but I wouldn't be surprised if it has to just sit in a bank account earning very little.

Even a small bank would be able to invest the money much better.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

If I can make an assumption; it’s your fault. I’m just trying to gift you something you’ll appreciate. Can’t you help with sone sort of wish list or favorite store? I know gift cards are a ripoff but no one uses checks anymore and without any constraints I have no reasonable way to gift you something you’d appreciate

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The government should consider printing some sort of paper voucher as a representation of money to be used in instances such as this. /s

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I do remember such a thing from decades ago, but haven’t seen anything like that in years. Do people still use it? Do i need to goto some sort of museum? Can I use it online or from my phone?

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

It doesn’t matter—you can use it with your drug dealer, which is what you probably wanted anyway.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why bother telling retailers how to package them? Just hold the card companies financially responsible for the theft/scams and force them to honor what the customer paid for in the store. I'm sure the card companies will figure out on their own how to stop the thefts and scams, once they are actually responsible for the money.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That still forces customers to report fraud, and then fight whatever refund hurdles the company can implement. Most people will not do the above for a few dollars.

Doing both is an even better situation. Make them fix the packaging to a minimum standard but also put them on the hook for fraud loses.

[–] Poiar@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

Is the nation OK?

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Aren't gift cards activated electronically?

Maybe it's just a Canadian thing but if your gift cards are sitting preloaded and tappable like... who the fuck thought that was a good idea.

[–] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From the article..

Card draining is a scheme in which thieves remove gift cards from stores, capture their numeric codes or swap them out for counterfeit cards, and place the products back on display. When an unsuspecting customer loads money onto a tampered or counterfeit card, criminals access it online and steal the balance.

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I've experienced this in the past. Luckily the store Winners (a Canadian chain) was good enough to replace the cards.

[–] Hellinabucket@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

From the article it sounds like what they're doing is replacing the activation keys on the cards and then putting them back on the shelf, then when the card is activated what really happens is the money is loaded on the card they have.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Each card has an activation code that the cashier scans. They then enter a dollar amount to load on the card. That's how it is supposed to work. What happens in this scam is that thieves shoplift a couple cards. They take one card, for themselves. Then duplicate the activation code from that card, and the activation codes on the other cards which they then secretly put back on the rack at the store. When someone goes to the store and buys an altered card, the cashier scans it and loads the purchaser's money onto the card that the thieves already have.