this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
1029 points (98.5% liked)

politics

23420 readers
2309 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Gates should hire a hit man to take out Musk.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Shit pot, meet turd kettle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

At least this one follows the advice of his PR team. 🙄 but yeah.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Not just the poorest and not just children.

Not just Musk. https://bdsmovement.net/microsoft

[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I got downvoted on Lemmy the other day because I said that I prefer Bill Gates to Musk.

Maybe there are things about Gates I don't know. Maybe he is actually quite an evil person; I don't know. But he does at least spend billions of dollars helping vulnerable people, right? And Bill's stances on global politics are far more sensible than those of Musk.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would like to recommend listening to the Behind the Bastards episodes on Bill Gates. He's a piece of shit. Not as bad as Elon, but that's not really the point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah maybe there's stuff I'm not aware of. I've seen some people on Lemmy point out that Bill Gates lobbied for the University of Oxford to not open source their Covid vaccine. I suppose that seems shitty on the face of it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, he's a bit of a shit. That would not surprise me in the least.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well yes, but no. If you see capitalism, which includes billionaires having a right to exist, as a set standard, I would 100% agree with you. But billionaires shouldn't even exist in the first place. You only become a billionaire, by either massively exploiting your workerforce, capitalising every single aspect of your product/customer and not redirecting your profits back to society. We shouldn't live in a world, where we are cheering for people giving away their money, that they shouldn't own in the first place. There is no ethic way to be a billionaire.

To prevent misunderstandings: I 100% agree, that this is actually a good thing, but we still have to raise awareness about the societal and political problems of billionaires existing in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree it should be illegal and it is immoral, but these are the current rules of the game. It's not that Bill Gates is necessarily evil, the problem is how modern states and societies distribute wealth, which is based on a credit system where small incomes are dominated by large incomes (owners get most of the credit). The guise is that they also assume the risk but we know that very rich people eventually gain political power to mitigate that risk on the many not rich people. The problem then is that there is no easy way for not rich people to self organize and distribute credit more fairly, which also needs to distribute risk as well. Cause at the end of the day, it is about two things: people wanting to avoid risk and yielding credit and people accumulating wealth and gaining political power, over many generations. That said, Musk is a very twisted and malicious personality while Bill Gates is more of a typical rich entitled person with a savior complex.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There are no good billionaires. But I must agree that Bill Gates cannot be compared to Elon Musk. Bill has done evil, but his evil doesn't compare to what Elon Musk is doing right now

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think it's a silly to waste one's time struggling over deciding which one is worse. They're both billionaires who spend hundreds of millions of dollars undermining the public interest. Gates just cares more about his PR than Musk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The massive cock slobbering that Warren Buffet got at his Woodstock of Capitalism last week was nauseating. All the media were fawning over how he’s still a small-town Nebraska bumpkin. I have to hand it to him he crafted his image perfectly as a “good billionaire” too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Woz is what a good billionaire looks like.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Oh but I heard he lives in a humble little house in Omaha!

"Humble Little House in Omaha"----->

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

They're tone deaf. Comparatively that property IS humble in the world of billionaires. But that ain't no roach infested bachelor.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Nuance is lost on a lot of people on here. All billionaires bad therefore no billionaire is preferred. While I agree there's no good billionaire there's a spectrum of bad. Like would I rather break my pelvis or break my legs? Both are bad but one is preferable.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean Gates donated his own money to help the poorest people in the world. Elon spent his money to become president so he could steal money from the poor at people in the world.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Gates donated his money to avoid taxes and start a big pharma company.

Also Bill Gates comment is about USAID an imperialistic tool which has killed many millions of children. The irony of this statement is palpable.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I cannot be the only one here who sees tiny hands.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

They look like team america world police puppet hands

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

Fuck, I can't unsee it now.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago

Elon is a Nazi

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Nobody is mentioning the tiny hands. Its like Trump's tiny hands.

[–] [email protected] 156 points 3 days ago (35 children)

Cool story, Bill. Who did you donate to? Why did you cut your philanthropic efforts to fight climate change and disease? Why have you and your buddies fought for minimizing and coopting government for years? Bill isn't innocent in all this, it's just a good time to blame Elon. Don't get me wrong, Elon 100% deserves it, but that doesn't mean that Bill isn't playing the PR game here.

[–] [email protected] 144 points 3 days ago (43 children)

Why did you cut your philanthropic efforts to fight climate change and disease? Why have you and your buddies fought for minimizing

The problem is that billionaires should not exist but come on. $80 billion already donated. $7 Billion more just for Africa. Hundreds of millions in malaria research.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlieporterfield/2022/11/17/bill-gates-foundation-pledges-7-billion-to-support-africa-health-and-agriculture/

Could he do more? Sure. But attacking someone who is doing a little because he isn't doing more doesn't seem fair.

Years ago Elon said he was disappointed when he met Bill Gates because Gates only wanted to talk about philanthropy and climate.

load more comments (43 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago (14 children)

How many children died because Bill Gates lobbied for the Oxford Covid-19 vaccine to be patented?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Idk how many people have died from Covid 19 vax? I keep taking it and my cock is huge, no other side effects

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Your claim seems a bit BS. It was apparently to have a better distribution and quality.

AstraZeneca claimed not to get profits from the vaccine sales. This seems kind of fair knowing that doses were sold at about $4 USD (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford%E2%80%93AstraZeneca_COVID-19_vaccine#Early_development - https://reliefweb.int/report/world/uk-donates-20-million-more-oxford-astrazeneca-vaccines-countries-need)

Unless you're talking about the side effects?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It was apparently to have a better distribution and quality.

This is bullshit. The Oxford vaccine was specifically designed to be manufactured using existing processes and distribution channels.

AstraZeneca claimed not to get profits from the vaccine sales.

If the whole world got effective covid vaccines at cost of production then no-one would pay Pfizer for their novel (and expensive) technology. Gates Foundation secured a return of over 15 times more than its initial investment in BioNTech.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 3 days ago (53 children)

Remember there are no good billionaires. No amount of "good" they do will ever be enough.

load more comments (53 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Bill gates is always spending his money eradicating diseases. Maybe he can eradicate this musk disease too

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I really do think it would be fun to compile all of the billionaires in the world and just have them fight to the death in a gladiator kind of rig. Would be awesome.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

so this is what he meant by eliminated world hunger, by killing them directly or indirectly.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›