this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
285 points (99.0% liked)

News

36292 readers
2770 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

SAO PAULO (AP) — A Brazilian Supreme Court justice on Friday seized about $3 million from bank accounts belonging to social media platform X and satellite-based internet service provider Starlink, both companies controlled by tech billionaire Elon Musk.

The move by Justice Alexandre de Moraes was aimed at collecting funds that are equivalent to the amount that X owes to the country in fines. The bank accounts of the two companies have since been unfrozen.

Legal analysts have questioned de Moraes’ prior decision to freeze Starlink’s bank account to pay for cases related to X. While Musk owns both X and SpaceX, which operates Starlink, the two companies are separate entities.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just, just a terrible terrible title

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Framed to make it look like a corrupt judge, when its just the totally standard seizing of assets due to a fine that hasnt been paid.

Happens to normal civilians all the time so why not to companies?

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I was seriously trying to figure out why this guy was paying the fines

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's probably a translation error from Portuguese to English

Or a translation error from based AF to AP corporate bootlicking.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Separate entities that decided to be in contempt of court over the same issue. That sort of shit justifies piercing the corporate veil. Starlink backtracked after they realized the absolute fuck up they performed, but that judge viewed it as too little, too late.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

3.3m / 182b = 0.0018% of Elon Musk's wealth.

What percentage of your wealth do you lose if you get caught driving 5mph over the speed limit?

This shit needs to be proportional to both severity of the crime and total wealth.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

My most recent speeding ticket cost me 14% of my bank account and about a week later resulted in me putting groceries on a credit card.

I agree with you.

[–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Musk isn't hurt by the amount of money he's fined, but it annoys him terribly that he can't control the situation and that his usual tools for getting his way are useless. It is a pebble in his boot that he can't bluster, cajole, or bribe his way out of the problem like usual.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While they are separate entities, its not like musk treats them as such when it benefits him. he redirected a ton of GPUs from tesla to twitter, for example

[–] Deello@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Isn't this one of the things SBF got charged/arrested for, mixing assets from different companies.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago

Yep! He's moved employees between the two companies too.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This was the only they were gonna get paid. Musk couldn't even be bothered to pay the agreed lease on his own headquarters. And that was before he jammed his head up Trump's asshole so he's probably even more contemptuous about paying his dues now.

[–] clot27@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Brazil doing based stuff

[–] credo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Should have withdrawn $2,299,999 just so Musk would have to pay that last dollar himself.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I will make my own Brazil, with hate speech and rockets 😢