this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
25 points (93.1% liked)

Europe

5720 readers
1335 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They arent in power yet and i am already so sick of them. Thanks to them the AfD will be at ocer 30% next time

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

This was actually said by Nancy Faeser, who is still an acting minister of the parting government. Her party (SPD) will be part of the new government coalition, but her ministry (internal affairs) will go to the CSU. In my opinion it's even worse that she, as a SPD politician said that rather than some C*U politician, because for them it wouldn't be anything new.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

And to make matters worse, the one taking over the ministry is Alexander Dobrindt... who tried to introduce Autobahn tolls (the CSUs pet project at that time) when he was transport minister...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

The SPD hasn't left out any chance to strengthen the far right and move to the right herself. The party has a long history of betraying working class people and left principals like human rights and anti racism, when she can get some power instead.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

That Feaser even still is part of the SPD is beyond me. But knowing that SPD doesnt have any balls and just wants to stay in any position of power no matter what, explains it. Doesnt excuse it, but explains it.

I hope they dont make weed illegal again because like i said 3 years ago, god i will need it to get threw the next few years

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm not sure how I feel abour the parties that won the election now executing the plans of the losing party, in order to prevent that party from winning an election next time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am with you, I think it's a dumb idea. I believe we will suffer from this when the extreme right gains more political ground because of it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

I actually don't think that they do it with the intention that the far right won't get more votes:

https://www.stern.de/kultur/asyl-im-merz-wahlkampf--so-sind-sie-halt--die-auslaender-35444510.html

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But hasnt this always been done? One example that comes to my mind, is CDU deciding to phase out atomic reactors or legalizing gay marriage because of the pressure from the greens.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

The CDU didn't decide to phase out nuclear reactors. It had prolonged the running time of the nuclear reactors just a year or two prior. It then backtracked on that move, getting back to the original plans. Also the CDU did not legalize gay marriage. They put it up to vote with the "Fraktionszwang" - the group coercion that is an informal principle of federal parliamentary groups - being lifted. Merkel herself voted against legalizing gay marriage. It was only that most of the opposition and governing SPD at the time and some of the CDU voted in favor.

Furthermore it is fundamentally different that now the CDU is helping to create the demand for more deportations and violation of the human rights of people by spreading lies and hate themselves, while blocking policies that could solve some of the problems that they blame migrants for (cost of housing and utilities, infrastructure and education investments, access to healthcare...)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was done, because they could win elections with it, as those policies were genuinly popular and still mostly are. After Fukushima the greens were winning state elections against the CDU. There are also a fairly high number of gay conservative politicans in Germany. Jens Spahn and Alice Weidel come to mind.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Yes, but doesn't that match exactly to what's happening now? Most Germans agree that migration should be reduced. The CDU is loosing state elections against the AFD. So they have to react.

I'm not trying to argue it's the right thing to do, or that I personally support it. Just find the parallels interesting

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

It's a political necessity really. If you keep denying the losing party any influence, they'll grow bigger.

The Danish political system has very successfully stopped the far right parties by acknowledging their concerns and bringing some but not all of their policies into the centrist parties. Honestly this is probably much better than the alternative of the far right parties getting more and more influence.

EDIT: If you're not Danish and not familiar with our (very successful, I might add) democratic political system, you might not understand, but it has worked quite effectively here. Keep in mind the Danish political leaning is quite leftist already, so even some of our "right-wing" parties are still quite left wing all things considered.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

You don't win elections by accepting the framing of issues by fascists. You can't do Nazi-light, people will just want to vote for the real thing anyway.

You need to point out that the economic hardships people are experiencing are due to billionaires hoarding wealth globally, not some poor immigrant trying to feed their family.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

yeah, that is going really well /s -- same in Germany - when the established parties started integrating fascist rhetoric/actions into theirs, the fascist party went from 10 to 20 percent in elections.

You cannot sway the dumb voters who fall for fascist rhetoric, by going "yes, the fascists are right, but .." because if the fascists are right, why change? Anything after "but" will be discarded by voters. All they heard was you agreeing with them.

Instead say "The fascists are wrong, because .." and then list one of the many, many reasons, ideally you also list ones applicable to the situation at hand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

quite the tell on how good democracy really is. don't hate the player, hate the game

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago