And now officially the judiciary surrenders its powers.
this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
361 points (99.5% liked)
News
35703 readers
2867 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Lol. This country is filled to the brim with cowards renouncing their oaths.
Home of the brave my fucking ass.
True, we're cowards all the way down.
I dunno. Bernie's kinda badass. And AOC rules.
For sure, there are folks acting courageously, but by and large people are cowards.
They just meant the natives...not courageous people lol
It should be "the land of the free and the former home of the brave".
He also wasn’t swayed by the AP’s argument that it’s unconstitutional for the president to have sole discretion over who covers him at these smaller events. “We are not at the point where we can make much of a determination one way or another,” said McFadden, ruling from the bench. “I don’t intend to micromanage the White House.” McFadden said that the first few days since his order took effect gave him concerns that Trump’s team is “not proceeding in compliance here, or perhaps malicious compliance.” But the judge, appointed to the court by Trump during the president’s first term, said he has to assume that the administration is operating in good faith unless time proves otherwise.
Uh, no you don't, dipshit. You don't at all. I doubt there are many laws that dictate assumptions need to be made. This isn't corporate America, you don't have to assume positive intent.
But the judge, appointed to the court by Trump during the president’s first term, said he has to assume that the administration is operating in good faith unless time proves otherwise.
Mr Judge, trump is intentionally defying your judicial order. What part of that is operating in good faith? What will it take for your to see that "good faith" has long since been exhausted?
One has to wonder if the judge is operating in good faith. smh
What you call "good faith" and what they call "good faith" and what he calls "good faith" and what she calls "good faith" and what the judge calls "good faith" is all different kinds of faith.
It fucking kills me how judges will absolutely fuck every day people up, but then when it comes to the wealthy and well connected, it's suddenly "oh, well, they only murdered two people, I think a fine is kind of crossing the line here, let's be reasonable about this".
They led an otherwise blameless life, after all
So, as I expected, the judgment is entirely useless. Without strong enforcement, these judgments are utterly valueless. The court exists as a watchdog against corruption and abuse - but at this point, it's contributing. He should absolutely be micromanaging the White House and looking out to preserve the meaning of our Constitution.
Fourth box.
Saint Luigi guide us
If Dems ever get this shit back.. I hope they dismantle Fox News and ban it.
What fucking use is a court order without enforcement?
Very often in a civilized society, enforcement isn't necessary.
So. Yeah.
The lack of consequences for anyone doing illegal shit is exactly why the illegal shit will continue.
I'll give you 1 guess at who appointed this judge to the bench
lol
WASHINGTON (AP) — For nearly 100 days, President Donald Trump has rattled Washington and been chastened by its institutions.
He’s startled world leaders with his unpredictability and tough talk, but won their praise for a surprise strike on Syria.
He’s endured the steady drip of investigations and a seemingly endless churn of public personnel drama.
“It’s a different kind of a presidency,” Trump said in an Oval Office interview with The Associated Press, an hourlong conversation as he approached Saturday’s key presidential benchmark.
I've said it before and some of you really don't want to hear this, but AP has soft-pedaled trump since day 1 and now they're reaping their reward. Perhaps they should have told the truth instead of choosing the barest descriptors to indicate he's a demented rapist fraud committing treason.
They've never said "lies". They've never made the obvious case that he's not competent. They've done everything every other corporate news sewer has done, which is to state the basics in as non-threatening a way as possible and hope the intellgentsia glean their implications. Which helps no one but themselves.
Journalism - such as the AP represents - has failed catastrophically. No one is happy about that. But the AP can only blame themselves. In a reasonable world, they would take this as the challenge it is and start busting trump's chops every day all day - BUT THEY WON'T. They'll lie down and wait the years it takes to pass, continuing to poop out stenography for the administration until hopefully someone else gains power and lets them back in to the food bowl.
Fuck the AP. And I say that knowing full well they're one of the better corporate news sewers. That's how far down we are. They refuse to help, they refuse to fulfill the basic journalistic brief of speaking truth to power and they do so because they're run by republiQans who want trump to be their fascist king. I hope they fold as an organization after briefly attempting porn as a last ditch attempt to stay solvent.
Well I’m glad you managed to find a way to blame the AP for being banned from the White House instead of the one who banned them.
Oh I'm not blaming them. I'm saying they deserved it.
Where the rule of law means nothing to the wealthy, the government should mean nothing to the poor.
And I'm sure at Easter dinner my whole family will still be saying "Thank god Trump's second term will be over in 4 years and things will go back to normal!" as if anyone in the government will actually be willing and able to prevent him from simply continuing on with his dictatorship. This cinches it for me - I'm convinced that we're not getting out of this without American Revolution 2.0.
The first thing Putin did before staying in power forever was to amend the constitution to give himself another term.
Fortunately it's much harder to amend our constitution. It won't happen, at least not legally, and there will be some sort of pushback.
In related news, the sky is blue, the rocks are hard, and rain is wet.
Fake news!
Time for the AP to file a writ of mandamus. Loudly.
Land of the weak home of the bootlicker