this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
335 points (96.1% liked)

AskUSA

969 readers
1 users here now

About

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:

  1. !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
  2. !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here

Rules

  1. Be nice or gtfo
  2. Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
  3. Follow the rules of discuss.online

Sister communities

  1. !askuk@feddit.uk
  2. !casualuk@feddit.uk
  3. !casualconversation@lemm.ee
  4. !yurop@lemm.ee
  5. !esp@lemm.ee

Related communities

  1. !asklemmy@lemmy.world
  2. !asklemmy@sh.itjust.works
  3. !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
  4. !showerthoughts@lemmy.world
  5. !uspolitics@lemmy.world
  6. !politics@piefed.social

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Banned is maybe too far, but why should we as a country allow people to have petty power over meaningless things their neighbors do? Could we ban HOAs from being included in house sales, and every time it's sold the new owners have to opt in?

For the most part, I'm wondering about this in the context of single family homes since for homes like condos, you could make the case that HOAs are useful for shared things like roofs and whatnot. Maybe limit mandatory HOA involvement to things like what's truly necessary and shared and not how tall your grass is?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I hate my HOA except that it's the only thing from keeping my neighbor from filling his yard up with garbage and junk cars. My bar is low, but it's above that. We live too close for that kinda shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DireTech@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

I’ve lived with good HOAs. I’d still rather they dissolve and everything be part of normal city operations.

Plus is it just me or are the same people that say they want small government also the ones who are super pro HOA?

[–] emberinmoss@beehaw.org 5 points 7 months ago

Yes, definitely. They’re just bullies trying to rebrand themselves.

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A lot of things an hoa covers is already covered by the township here so I'm unsure why you'd join one. But they're also not as common here because of that. I know some neighbors tried ages ago and something like 80 percent told those prone to screw off.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My experience- the difference is enforcement. In the US anyway, the town isn't going to tow cars parked illegally in the neighborhood or cite someone for their junked up yard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yes

You can have community orgs that don't make you pay fees as a condition of owning your home.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago

Yes. Housing is tough enough as it is. Linking a lot of properties to the HOA is disgusting and should be illegal.

[–] shani66@ani.social 4 points 7 months ago

Objectively yes. We don't need an extra government to cover the job of the actual government, especially not ones that are easy for psychopaths to infiltrate. Your park? That's the damn state's responsibility, pay your fair share of taxes instead and let the city handle it. Your home value? Don't treat housing as a damn vehicle for investment. All those nasty poors and minorities? If they bother you find a way to leave earth, permanently.

HOAs are emblematic of everything wrong with America and actively strip away the good parts.

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

I mean I highly dislike them but also feel like many people like them for the exact reasons I dislike them.

[–] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

Absolutely.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago

for regular ass house on a regular ass street, yes. exceptions are made for condominiums, apartment complexes and gated communities.

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 3 points 7 months ago

Waiting for the inevitable showdown over having hens in your backyard. Instant solution to the egg problem.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 months ago

Should HOAs be banned?

That's an easy one:

YES!!!

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I think a small community being able to have say in who moves in, asking contract term violators to leave in exceptional cases, while still being liable for discriminatory actions, can be a good thing. However, being able to fine members and repossess their property? That should be 100,000,000% illegal.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't want to live in a neighborhood where you can leave a car to rot on the front lawn, where you can have cows shitting all over, or you can build a 20 foot tall Jesus statue in your front yard.

If your HOA sucks, then get involved and make it better. Mine is fine.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago

city odanances usually can prevent the first two, however requre elected leaders or direct voting to let it happen reducing the chance that a cowless minority could ban them.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

An HOA can have a very positive effect on a neighborhood when handled properly, but inevitably a troublemaker gets on the board and starts making life miserable for everyone.

There was a recent local case where an elderly lady in her 80s accidentally underpaid her HOA dues by 30 cents. They started fining her, and before she figured out there was an issue, the fines were thousands of dollars, and she couldn't afford it. She tried to work it out with the HOA board, but they were immovable. Then they started foreclosure proceedings, and that's when she went to the local news.

This lady's house was paid off, and they had every intention of taking it away from her in her old age, over THIRTY CENTS!

The news tried to reason with the HOA, but they wouldn't be reasonable, and the last I heard, she was going to have to pay a lawyer to fight it in court.

No HOA should be able to take anyone's house away for any reason. Same with back property taxes, especially if a propery is fully paid off. It invites predatory behavior, and there are always people who will gleefully exploit such situations.

[–] parrhesia@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago
[–] seeigel@feddit.org 2 points 7 months ago

Banned? The freedom cities will be the best HOAs ever.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›