this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
718 points (98.6% liked)

196

2965 readers
1744 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

US capitalists created modern china.
Literally raised it.

And now china is beating US in it's own game while having a better social system: mandatory vacations, pensions and health care.

There is absolutely nothing anyone can do - other countries will keep buying inexpensive shit from china because there are no alternatives. Tariffs no tariffs whatever.

And it seems to me - US people are being pushed into the corner to start demanding a larger share of the pie and a better social net as a typical US global economic advantages are disappearing leaving more people in poverty while offering no social net improvemeents that the rest of the world population has gotten last century.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 16 hours ago

America is now the worst of both worlds. It doesn't have the reliable liberal empire that kept it as a central world power for the last century. Trump's strategy is entirely domestic, with his end goal of centralizing the entire nation's power in his hands for the handful of years he has left alive. It's power for power's sake; strongman brainrot with no place for anyone strong outside of himself.

The fascists will not hold on long without him, no matter how much they try to pretend that their beliefs are a strength. The only advantage they have is a rabid devotion to their cause and a willingness to do evil shit guilt free. They're only placated because they're the violent muscle.

The capitalists have actually lost the most power for the time being, as the liberal democratic system really empowered them more than any other. They were too greedy to pay the social services fee, and now they need to kiss the ring until the king is dead. Trump crashing the economy forces them to help fascists squeeze the plebs, as they're too cowardly to ever kill the king.

We need people to direct their ire directly at the rich right now, as their great power earns them all the responsibility for this mess. Everyone's ass is on the menu and we will know no peace.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

And now china is beating US in it's own game while having a better social system: mandatory vacations, pensions and health care.

I get what you're trying to say here. But social systems have never been the USA's game... Maybe more like europes

[–] [email protected] 101 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you look at those tariffs from the PoV of economic and external policies, they sound a lot like "I'll shit myself so others will need to smell it". They're a bit harmful to other countries, sure, as each lost one reliable trading partner; USA, though, lost all of them.

And yes, all of them. Even governments and businesses from countries not deeply affected by the tariffs are seeing USA as a high risk partner, looking for alternatives, and at least my country (Brazil) is deepening ties with China.

But I digress. I think that what's going on is about USA's internal policy; if you put it side-to-side with other things like

  • forcing businesses to call the Gulf of Mexico by some esoteric name;
  • harassing universities;
  • removing government staff based on political allegiance; etc.

then you realise that it's all about loyalty towards Trump himself and his agenda. This taco-haired clown is trying to keep himself and his buds in power forever there, and for that he needs support.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"I'll shit myself so others will need to smell it"

That's incredibly on-brand for Trump in so many ways.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's also White America in a nutshell. Racists will shit themselves just so the black person would smell it. Makes sense though, trump campaigned on racism and hatred... and won.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

White America

Can we not overgeneralize an entire race-based demographic when we're trying to make fun of racists?

Seems kind of, I dunno, racist?

For fuck's sake people.

Edit: To be clear, this is on brand for Trump and his band of sycophants, magats, whatever you want to label them. Just don't try to label an entire skin tone as belonging to his support group.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

I'm using the term in the same context that F.D. Signifier and Tyler, the Creator use it (and likely lot's of other people). As far as I understand it, not all white Americans are part of "White America", but "White America" is necessarily all white (excluding "Latinos for Trump", et al.). These are the people, through ignorance or directed hate, take full advantage of their privilege based on their skin colour; hence, "White America".

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

probably the most Trump thing there is

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

Trump isn't trying to keep his buds in power forever, only himself in power until he dies. Given his old age and rabid cult, we aren't getting rid of him till he dies. Once he does perish, the fascists are kinda fucked without him. He's made sure to keep them weak.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

People (... who don't want to admit that he's a home-grown disease) love to talk about how Trump is a Russian asset.

...... But like. Have we considered that he is a Chinese asset instead?

China seems to really benefit from his shenanigans. Everyone is snuggling up to them while the US are fucking about.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

It's not a speculation. You misunderstood. He openly admits and acts and comments on how he loves his model for government and is going to be a dictator too. It's not a consideration. He is a lapdog. He is only accidentally also a Chinese asset.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There's been memes on Chinese social media since at least 2020 calling him Comrade Chuān Jiànguó (川建国) and saying he's working to destroy the US to China's benefit. Chuan is just a sinicized form of Trump and Jianguo is a given name from the first decades of the PRC (Trump's generation) that means "to build/found the [Chinese] nation"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Manchurian candidate is the western term

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think he's most often called a Russian asset because he has multiple apparent connections to the Russian government. Just looking up 'trump Russian ties' brings up multiple different articles detailing ties which connect Trump to Putin. It's not necessarily proven, but the general view in media at least is: if trump is a foreign agent, he's a Russian one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

The piss tape is real

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah I'm not sure Krasnov has the attention span to be actively on the payroll of multiple countries, even though he'd benefit.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Trump would not allow his VP call the Chinese "peasants" if the president is a Chinese asset.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’d be really weird if he was a Chinese asset as he is pretty damn sinophobic

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

The perfect cover though. (And I'm only half joking)

[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The problem I have is that there's no endpoint that will convince people that this isolationist/protectionist way of thinking is harmful to their own interests. England still isn't going to admit this about Brexit. Let's see how America fares.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

AFAIK, if the UK wanted to rejoin the EU they would lose a lot of the advantages they had last time and have to switch to the Euro. I wouldn't mind the Euro personally though. So basically yeah, the UK did a huge blinder with Brexit, all it's done is make things worse.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes. But even more accurate in this case would've been the original meme format, where the US would be rage screaming "STOP MOVING ON WITHOUT ME!!! 🤬"

They've already even complained about the mere possibility of Canada switching trade focus to Europe, calling it an unfair team up against the poor little victim US which "would have consequences".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Weird that you people think after hundreds of years you’re going to align with China over the United States because of the Current president that probably won’t even be alive in the next decade

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's not. Most competent leaders have seen that there's no benefit to feeding Trump's shenanigans for our ever dwindling economic power. It's literally basic economics that competition will reduce the price each empire will set, so most economies will be better off now that Trump officially ushered in a multipolar world

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Reduce what price? What are you saying is the price here?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

All American goods were backed by an unmatched global empire that leveraged its wealth, military, and soft power. Our cushy trade agreements rely on credibility and trust that Trump has burned overnight. Think all the bridges burned by Brexit only worse

edit: also other imperial services like protection from regional enemies

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump is a symptom of a problem in the US that has been developing since the 80s. When he dies the problem doesn't go away

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

The funders who funded him, the think tanks that created his policy, the media that propagandizes his voters, the voters that vote for him, none of those are going away, and the feedback loops connecting them don't seem likely to be stopping anytime soon.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe not overnight, but all friends begin as strangers.

The issue with the US isn't exactly Trump himself, it's that nearly half of American voters endorse him and that there's a line of vying inheritors for his brand of politics forming.

Trade, foreign, and domestic policy in the US can now be reasonably assumed to turn on a dime every few years, and that's exposure to risk that nobody wants to deal with.

Even within the four years, we're like three months in and the man is rapidly changing his mind on the fundamentals of international relationships. Whether he's manipulating markets, trying to force capitulation somehow, or something else is irrelevant - other countries are more stable and those relationships can provide what's needed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Hundreds of years of what?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I mean, we can very extremely petty when slighted.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

im oki with working with china peeps. they seem a bit more reasonbl than US politics... ~

(im obv spitballin, jus a dum lil grmn ovr here)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

jus a dum lil grmn? i though you were smorty!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

well yea i am... bt theres nuu diffrnc...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I mean for years now (at least since Obama) the US has been trying to destroy the WTO piece by piece as the fundamentals of the WTO do not align with the US trade policies and do favor China. So they wanted an organisation that favours the US. Obama started it by blocking the appointment of WTO appellate members, leading the WTO to being nothing more than a construct not able to enforce its rules. Trump kept that blockade and started a trade war with China, but since he needs attention he did this very publicly. When Brandon came around, he kept what Trump did as a meassure against China and kept the blockade alive, he was just quiet about it. Now Trump came again and saw it's still standing and did set up for the final blow, but did it in such a castastrophic clumsy way... the plan of replacing the WTO with another US centric organisation is now as unrealistic as it could be.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I cannot imagine any realistic plan to replace wto with another system just excluding china.
That would have had to be monstrous coherent and sustained effort on the scale of what Russia and china are doing with bricks.
I have not seen that with either Obama or others.

Then such a replacement organization would offer what exactly benefits the rest of the world? Seems like not much so forcing other countries to join it would have been somewhat dubious.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

I feel including dictatorships in your economy is not a good idea from Europe's perspective... They would do well to find some new democracies to rely on instead

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

This is similar to Donald in the NYC society in the eighties. Never did get accepted there.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Idk what’s up but you can say something about china on lemmy and watch ccp minions stalk you for days. I do it sometimes when I wait in bank queue.

I like to think I am wasting regime’s money

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago

Several billions of us too late, m8...