this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
193 points (99.5% liked)

World News

45654 readers
2509 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

NATO has been warned of potential global internet blackouts amid a surge in suspected Russian sabotage of subsea fibre optic cables.

Telecom giants like Vodafone, Telefonica, and Orange urged UK, EU, and NATO officials to classify the undersea cable network as critical infrastructure.

Since October 2023, at least 11 cables have been damaged in the Baltic Sea, with over 50 Russian vessels spotted nearby. The UK is monitoring the Russian spy ship Yantar.

Officials also raised concerns about Chinese activity near Taiwan and called for increased surveillance and international cooperation.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This extortion and ad brought to you by Starlink and Elon Musk. It is what he talks about with Putin. It was never a real issue in the past. There is redundancy in the system. Cutting yourself off from communication assets is not very bright and hurts yourself as much as others in almost every case. The blind spot works both ways in the long term for an advantage that only lasts hours to days in limited strategic depth. So you take some asset in the dark. Now you need to defend that asset from the dark, or the newly created blind spot is now your vulnerability too. None of this makes much sense in the real world. What does make sense is an extortionist no one wants around trying to make everyone pay for his kingpin politics.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Starlink routes through ground-based infrastructure though. If you separated England, for example, from the world then starlink is also going to be either separated or badly impacted in England.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Where are you getting that from? If this were a real constraint, Ukrainian systems would be a joke, as would those on Starship, planes, boats, etc. The low orbital infrastructure is specifically to ensure high throughput. Some offloading is logical in some circumstances, but not as a constraint.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Mmm - seems there is some satellite->satellite routing in addition to the ground stations. It does degrade latency though.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Board them, hold a military court on the spot, hang the captain and first mate, throw the rest of the crew on the nearest shore, wherever the fuck that may be, scuttle the ship. That kinda action would take maybe twice, thrice if they're really stubborn. Instant mutiny if anyone onboard even suspects they're dragging cables. Boom. End of this shit.

Russian and Chinese ships are literally engaged in terrorism, piracy, invent a new word for all I care. China especially is testing what they can get away with, and the rest of the world is allowing it. Guess they got their answer.

You all should catch up on the news as to what they're pulling in the South China Sea, i.e., fucking with Vietnam and the Philippines. China is 1 inch away from publicly declaring, "These are Chinese waters, do sumpin' bout it!"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

I would recommend any developer's start to use library caches for builds.

run local instances of them to ensure that you can continue to work on any of your projects.

gitlab is handy for most cases.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hey, Europe, I think you may have to take action soon.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

We'll talk about it for a month or so and then we'll see

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I just realized that this is probably another reason trump wants to put starlink in the White House. They are planning for it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Makes it way more important for Europe to get their Internet Satellites up and running. That way people in U.S. can still have internet access, alongside more countries people that need it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I %100 agree

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can russia please cut themselves off from the rest of the Internet?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

We're just waiting out his assassination.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh, they can do that if need be. They already tested it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Can they test it again please, until they can learn to behave?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How would Fediverse instances deal with a net split? I assume local content would continue as normal, but federated posts would queue up until a route became available?

Could a server admin run a low bandwidth satellite link (for example) to reach a federated server, and thus the federated content would be amplified back to local reachable instance?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Interesting idea to run a low-bandwidth link. It would keep us connected, but posts from disconnected instances would arrive late, depending on how much the traffic (posts between disconnected instances) exceeds available bandwidth.

It's interesting to explore this more. We could, for example, prioritize specific types of posts, users, or instances to make those faster.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 days ago

Can you stop posting Torygraph right wing propaganda?